Date
1 - 6 of 6
locked Group archive visibility (was Find Group listing) #suggestion
whofanvidme,
It would be nice to have a temporary 'beta' mode which could beYour observation is a little bit off-topic, the topic being the Find a group (directory) listing - and a group can be switched between listed and unlisted at any time. Nevertheless, you've hit one of my pet peeves so I'll change the subject line and roll with it. It's like being forced to name your child at conception with noGreat analogy, and I agree. Having these "one-way traps" (you cannot open the group's archives to non-members once they've been restricted to members-only) are an impediment to group formation, and a real source of friction and confusion for novice group owners. Perhaps it could be allowed as long as the owner was the only member,Since the avowed purpose of the restriction is to protect the privacy of member's content, allowing the archives to be opened to non-members as long as the owner is the only member makes a lot of sense. I'd go further and allow the archives to be opened to non-members as long as the only postings in the archives were made by owners or moderators; or are older than the date/time the archives were last made members-only. The first condition would allow having a larger team work on the start-up of the group. The second condition would allow an established group to correct an accidental (or malicious) switch to members-only archives - perhaps at the cost of deleting a few messages that arrived after the switch. -- Shal
|
|
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Shal Farley <shal@...> wrote: Since the avowed purpose of the restriction is to protect the privacy of member's content, allowing the archives to be opened to non-members as long as the owner is the only member makes a lot of sense. I think at least allowing a group to be switched if the group owner is the only member is reasonable (and easy enough to check for). The other criteria gets a lot more complicated, programmatically. I've added it to the todo list. Thanks, Mark
|
|
Yeah, everyone seems to be defaulting to private groups which is annoying because I can't see the content in a group before I decide whether I want to join or not.
|
|
Hi Chris,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
If the list owners want to entice you to join, they can write a longer (better?) description if the group appears in the directory. You can, of course, see how active it is, how many members, last post, etc. Frances
|
|
I have only one private group on here and haven't even gotten it started beyond creating it.. I have another public one anyone can read or join: https://groups.io/org/groupsio/MMsanctuary/archives Abnd another public one anyone can read, but it's for the leaders & assistants of the Yahoo crusade and is invitation only, for the most part. https://groups.io/org/groupsio/owlperch/archives
|
|
I've started dating my Yahoo! Group's description any time I make a change
to it. That way anyone stumbling upon it in the directory is able to see that it was under active human control within the past few weeks. But that's more of a Yahoo! Groups problem than one I'd expect to find here.
|
|