Date
41 - 45 of 45
locked Calendar is live
This one's a non-issue for my groups. Our members would never have reason to bother with the calendar. Mods handle it. Just posting for feedback from a different user type... Trish
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote: A couple of people on one of our groups (and I) have a concern. I have the Calendar set for "Subscribers can view and edit". Unfortunately, that means that someone could accidentally (or intentionally) change an event. If it's worth doing, I think it would be safer to only allow the originator or moderators to make changes to an existing event. I'm sure it can be done, just not sure if it's worth the effort. On the other hand, the current capability could be used as a sort of RSVP where attendees added their names to the event. Decisions, decisions...
|
|
Duane,
I have the Calendar set for "Subscribers can view and edit".Perhaps the calendar ought to operate on the same principle as the messages: a member can only edit or delete an event they created. On the other hand, the current capability could be used as a sort ofProbably better done through an explicit RSVP mechanism than by general editing of the event. -- Shal
|
|
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:35 am, Shal Farley <shal@roadrunner.com> wrote:
Perhaps the calendar ought to operate on the same principle as theThose were my thoughts on both, but I never know when someone else might have a better idea. I know Mark has RSVP on his list, but this could be used until then if it would help. To be honest, I'd rather have the limited editing, so the RSVP part was more an afterthought. Duane
|
|
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:35 am, Shal Farley shal@... wrote:
I think this makes sense. I've added it to the todo list. Thanks, Mark
|
|
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:35 am, Shal Farley shal@... wrote:
I just pushed this change. It will only be in effect for new events; we didn't track who created events up until now. For old events, the old behavior still applies. Thanks, Mark
|
|