1. main@beta.groups.io
Topics

locked POLL: Change Archives to Messages?

Mark Fletcher
 

Should we change the name Archives to Messages?

Thanks,
Mark
Frances
 

Hi

I vote yes - Messages.

Clearer than Archives. 

It is familiar - YahooGroups uses Messages within the body of the page, as in “3 messages added in the last 7 days” and “New Messages”. Not “Conversations” which YG uses for its dropdown menu.

Frances

On Jan 23 15, at 1:55 PM, Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:

Should we change the name Archives to Messages?

Thanks,
Mark
Robert Maidment-Wilson
 

Yes please.

Robert

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the O2 network.
From: Mark Fletcher
Sent: Friday, 23 January 2015 18:55
To: beta@groups.io
Reply To: beta@groups.io
Subject: [beta] POLL: Change Archives to Messages?

Should we change the name Archives to Messages?

Thanks,
Mark
Duane
 

That sounds like a good alternative. I think I'd like Message Archives a bit better.  Gee, too bad there's not a POLL function on this site. (VBG)

Duane
Judy F.
 

Yes.

 

Thank you.

 

Judy F.

SW Florida - USA

 

From: Mark Fletcher [mailto:markf@corp.groups.io]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 1:56 PM
To: beta@groups.io
Subject: [beta] POLL: Change Archives to Messages?

 

Should we change the name Archives to Messages?

 

Thanks,

Mark
D R Stinson
 

Should we change the name Archives to Messages?
I think is is clearer to the typical group users. - Dano
Donna
 

I vote yes. Messages makes more sense. When I think of Archives, I think of something in storage, historical documents, and such.


Donna
Nightowl >8#
 

I think so. I think that would alleviate a lot of confusion. I also think of archives as older messages not current threads being posted in.


So I vote Yes.


Brenda
RS
 

I'd agree as well. 


Diana Gregory
 

On 1/23/2015 10:55 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Should we change the name Archives to Messages?
Yes, please.

dg
JohnF
 

I prefer "Messages" to "Archives" as well.  Archives comes from the listserv practice where it's assumed everyone gets mail, and no one has to look at old messages unless they're really wanting to look at OLD messages.  Messages is better when there may be some people who don't get mail and just want to read on the web.

JohnF
Diana Gregory
 

On 1/23/2015 5:42 PM, JohnF via GROUPS.IO wrote:
I prefer "Messages" to "Archives" as well. Archives comes from the
listserv practice where it's assumed everyone gets mail, and no one has
to look at old messages unless they're really wanting to look at OLD
messages. Messages is better when there may be some people who don't
get mail and just want to read on the web.
Can I add a "like" or a "+1" to John's message?

8-)

dg
ro-esp
 

Sure


Having a poll-feature would be nice too
Laurence Taylor
 

On 23/01/2015 18:55, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Should we change the name Archives to Messages?
Yes. Call the messages messages.


--
rgds
LAurence
<><
1 - 14 of 14