Date
1 - 3 of 3
locked group-page, top
ro-esp
6g. Re: [beta] New Subscription Options makes sense. featuring posts would be limited to public groups When you go to your group, you see this:Can we opt out of those top-thingies? Discussing is not a contest, and neither a subject nor a poster is "more important" because of more prolific messages However, I now see that Mark has put in a link to the archive (In box)I agree with those who prefer the term "messages" to "archive".Please do NOT call it "conversations" In the archive/messages I would prefer a chronological order, not newest on top. As to the term "inbox".... I sincerely hope that is reserved for what I see in my email-account, and not used for anything on a iogroups-website groetjes, Ronaldo -- http://www.esperanto.net http://www.moneyasdebt.net
|
|
On 1/23/2015 1:11 AM, ro-esp wrote:
Yes, please! Nothing to make any "forum" turn into more noise than signal than something indicating who is the "top". One of my biggest annoyances about LinkedIn. dg
|
|
On 1/23/2015 1:11 AM, ro-esp wrote:
And I agree with these - though for #2, I have reluctantly gotten used to Yahoo and the newest being "on top" in the web list of messages. In my email - everything is sorted with newest on the bottom - and in the order they got to my inbox. dg
|
|