|
Message to owner didn't show up under member's "Owner Messages" tab
#bug
You nailed it, J. I didn't think to check that. Thanks! Never mind, Mark! Pete
|
You nailed it, J. I didn't think to check that. Thanks! Never mind, Mark! Pete
|
By
Peter Cook
· #29197
·
|
|
Message to owner didn't show up under member's "Owner Messages" tab
#bug
(I should add - I did receive their reply at the owner address. It just didn't show up under their tab.)
|
(I should add - I did receive their reply at the owner address. It just didn't show up under their tab.)
|
By
Peter Cook
· #29195
·
|
|
Message to owner didn't show up under member's "Owner Messages" tab
#bug
My premium group requires prospective subscribers to reply to a Pending Subscription member notice. These replies go to the owner address. Today, for the first time, a new member's response did not sh
|
My premium group requires prospective subscribers to reply to a Pending Subscription member notice. These replies go to the owner address. Today, for the first time, a new member's response did not sh
|
By
Peter Cook
· #29194
·
|
|
call it "newsletter" instead of "announcement-only-group"
#suggestion
I think this can be best dealt with in the group description, monthly notice, and/or welcome notice. Pete
|
I think this can be best dealt with in the group description, monthly notice, and/or welcome notice. Pete
|
By
Peter Cook
· #29025
·
|
|
moderated
Stricter treatment of invalid hashtags
#bug
Thanks, Mark! pete
By
Peter Cook
· #28800
·
|
|
moderated
Stricter treatment of invalid hashtags
#bug
This seems to me to lie somewhere between a suggestion and a bug. We use hashtags a lot in my premium group, which is set up so that members can only use existing hashtags; if an invalid hashtag is us
|
This seems to me to lie somewhere between a suggestion and a bug. We use hashtags a lot in my premium group, which is set up so that members can only use existing hashtags; if an invalid hashtag is us
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28737
·
|
|
moderated
Member keeps being unsubscribed, and re-joins with settings he did not set
#misc
I'm wondering if he is using the word "bounce" correctly. One organization I volunteer for deals with anything they consider spam by simply deleting it. No bounce, no notifications, no fbl, period. So
|
I'm wondering if he is using the word "bounce" correctly. One organization I volunteer for deals with anything they consider spam by simply deleting it. No bounce, no notifications, no fbl, period. So
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28555
·
|
|
moderated
Topics page
#bug
Same here. Screenshot:
By
Peter Cook
· #28552
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
Whoops - I missed the "and have lost access to their original email account" in your post. Like J, need coffee.
|
Whoops - I missed the "and have lost access to their original email account" in your post. Like J, need coffee.
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28367
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
If they haven't lost access to their email, they can go to Log In > Email me a link to log in, and get in that way.
|
If they haven't lost access to their email, they can go to Log In > Email me a link to log in, and get in that way.
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28365
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
I discourage members from doing that, and my suggestion to them is easier: Just go to their account page and change it there. Pete
|
I discourage members from doing that, and my suggestion to them is easier: Just go to their account page and change it there. Pete
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28353
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
I think it's VERY easy. When someone has an issue and needs to change their address, I just tell them to go to https://groups.io/account and change it. It's never been a problem. Pete
|
I think it's VERY easy. When someone has an issue and needs to change their address, I just tell them to go to https://groups.io/account and change it. It's never been a problem. Pete
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28350
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
I agree with J - I just don't think the risk outweighs the benefit to the users. Maybe I'm missing some key point about the value of this capability? Pete
|
I agree with J - I just don't think the risk outweighs the benefit to the users. Maybe I'm missing some key point about the value of this capability? Pete
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28298
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
Mark, I think I've said this in the past so I may be repeating myself. I do not think I should have the ability to change anyone else's email address globally, if at all. I consider it just too much o
|
Mark, I think I've said this in the past so I may be repeating myself. I do not think I should have the ability to change anyone else's email address globally, if at all. I consider it just too much o
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28289
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Absolutely. But when the UI design leads to a user thinking things operate differently than they actually do, the manual doesn't help.
|
Absolutely. But when the UI design leads to a user thinking things operate differently than they actually do, the manual doesn't help.
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28122
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Or, something like Delivery = how you get it = individual, digest, or summary. Filter = what you get = none, special notices only, all, following only, following only + first message also, or followin
|
Or, something like Delivery = how you get it = individual, digest, or summary. Filter = what you get = none, special notices only, all, following only, following only + first message also, or followin
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28067
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
So, again: email delivery, message selection, and replies all determine which messages get to your inbox. So why not make them all part of the same block of settings?
|
So, again: email delivery, message selection, and replies all determine which messages get to your inbox. So why not make them all part of the same block of settings?
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28064
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
I've tested this and special notices still get delivered. There is no way not to get special notices that I can find when No Email is disabled.
|
I've tested this and special notices still get delivered. There is no way not to get special notices that I can find when No Email is disabled.
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28062
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
But her point is that that's not how it works - if someone is set to Special Notices Only, they get, well, special notices only. If they want more than special notices, they use individual, digest, or
|
But her point is that that's not how it works - if someone is set to Special Notices Only, they get, well, special notices only. If they want more than special notices, they use individual, digest, or
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28060
·
|
|
moderated
Poll participation by non-account holders
#suggestion
That's part of the purpose of beta.
|
That's part of the purpose of beta.
|
By
Peter Cook
· #28022
·
|
