For a pending message, it would be useful to be able to redirect it, either to make it a 'reply to sender' (rather than group), if appropriate, or to send it to an individual (member or otherwise), ra

#suggestion

While having invites last, unexpired, for ever is not desirable, having them expire after only 24 hours goes far too far to the other extreme. As others have said, many people - not just the less tech

#suggestion

When someone who is not a member of a main group joins - or attempts to - a sub-group (directly, with first joining the main group), there are various issues. See also https://groups.io/g/GroupManager

#bug

I've had a look - seems to be ok now, thanks, I am seeing correct times on feed. But there is an issue over 'all day' events - which in many ways - goes beyond this topic. For an event in 'my' time zo

#bug

As I mentioned in another thread, the Groups.io ecosystem is formed of three groups of stakeholders: "Service provider (Groups.io, Inc, i.e. Mark)", "Group Owners" and "Group Members" - each of whom h

#misc

Yes, checked out, fixed ok. Thanks. Jeremy

#bug

Coming out of topic https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/80139948 (issue searching for tom or jom), on me trying things: If I search my group for jom I get 7 hits, for tom 113 hits (this background inf

#bug

New topic started as suggeste - awaiting approval. Jeremy

#bug

A quick test on one of my groups found lots on searching for tom (t anywhere, including only after the @ (e.g. in hotmail.com), with ~om at end, or matching *o*omot*@*.*o.* (changing all other charact

#bug

Trying this on my systems. I seem to have the bug (times of of events coming up as PST in Feed, although my profile and calendar are set to UTC) on all of them - using Linux or Windows, Firefox or Edg

#bug

The difference being that under Drew's proposals, ALL members would be required to take a paid subscription, to be able to join groups (beyond perhaps a few) whichever groups they are. As such it is t

#suggestion

If you have a 'number of members' based charging scheme, then members become a cost, that someone has to pay. In Mark's original scheme, this would fall solely on group owners. Some will be happy with

#suggestion

Ultimately, while no one wants this, the point may be reached when FREE cannot be continued: the choice then becomes pay or lose... as I've mentioned before, in this situation, there is no good option

#suggestion

Some of the recent posts seem to be trying to avoid the fundamentals: Groups.io has to be paid (or it will go the way of Yahoo groups); that payment has to be, in some combination, by groups owners an

#suggestion

From a members perspective, I would say pretty simple. Either have a 'free' membership, but only be able to be a member of groups that have room for you (because someone else is paying). Or pay a bit

#suggestion

Yes: Mark's proposed 'per member' charge was 55 cents per year - to pay that much by Stripe, you need to start with $1. I think 5 or 10 dollars (reasonable for an 'unlimited (or at least many) groups

#suggestion

My thoughts: Groups.io service benefits both groups (i.e. group owners) and members (in varying proportion), in a three way relationship. As Groups.io costs money to run (including providing a living

#suggestion

As an informational aside: at 55 cents a member, under the new charging structure, a new Premium group with 1820 members will cost its owner $1000 per year (annual payment) - I don't know how many gro

#update

My compliments. And yes, it is a dichotomy which ignores a grey area in the middle - I would accept there are many group owners who run their groups for similar motives, and so get non-financial recom

#update

In the related "Simplified Donation feature", On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 09:37 PM, Andy Wedge wrote, but (this part) is I think more relevant to this thread: While I too can understand Mark's preference t

#update