|
moderated
First Message Also
#bug
No, other way around. It's perfectly possible that over time, there are several threads about the same topic. groetjes/ĝis, Ronaldo
|
No, other way around. It's perfectly possible that over time, there are several threads about the same topic. groetjes/ĝis, Ronaldo
|
By
ro-esp
· #25287
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
I disagree. If you change the subjectline, it's your intention to create a new thread. Also, I don't want to copy one of the worst parts of googlegroups: if you send a reply to a digest about subject
|
I disagree. If you change the subjectline, it's your intention to create a new thread. Also, I don't want to copy one of the worst parts of googlegroups: if you send a reply to a digest about subject
|
By
ro-esp
· #25093
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
If this is a suggestion, I'd like some clarity on what you mean by "rejected". Does the message simply get discarded, or does the author get a message back saying something like "you sent a message wi
|
If this is a suggestion, I'd like some clarity on what you mean by "rejected". Does the message simply get discarded, or does the author get a message back saying something like "you sent a message wi
|
By
ro-esp
· #25075
·
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
I don't see the improvement. "Leave" has several different meanings. If you prefer calling subscribers members, how about "end membership"? I don't think so. Seems to me that the term "unsubscribe" ha
|
I don't see the improvement. "Leave" has several different meanings. If you prefer calling subscribers members, how about "end membership"? I don't think so. Seems to me that the term "unsubscribe" ha
|
By
ro-esp
· #24772
·
|
|
moderated
New Groups.io Help Center now online
#misc
I have a suggestion for the FAQ. Add: what are hashtags for, and do I have to use them? Another suggestion is to please always spell it "help-center" or "helpcenter". I know dropping hyphens in favour
|
I have a suggestion for the FAQ. Add: what are hashtags for, and do I have to use them? Another suggestion is to please always spell it "help-center" or "helpcenter". I know dropping hyphens in favour
|
By
ro-esp
· #24703
·
|
|
moderated
Terminology change
#update
From a semantic viewpoint, I have to disagree. When an outsider sends a message to a group and receives the answers, that person is a user but not a member or subscriber of that group groetjes/ĝis, Ro
|
From a semantic viewpoint, I have to disagree. When an outsider sends a message to a group and receives the answers, that person is a user but not a member or subscriber of that group groetjes/ĝis, Ro
|
By
ro-esp
· #24634
·
|
|
moderated
Solving the overload issue (Selecting specific messages into two batches - Individual email vs. Full featured digest delivery)
#suggestion
I'm not sure why you think there should be a technical solution, nor even whether one is possible. The way I do it is by insisting on netiquette ( unfortunately http://www.learn.to/quote doesn't work
|
I'm not sure why you think there should be a technical solution, nor even whether one is possible. The way I do it is by insisting on netiquette ( unfortunately http://www.learn.to/quote doesn't work
|
By
ro-esp
· #24596
·
|
|
moderated
Another instance of "thread" Instead of "topic" (unfollowing)
#bug
I don't think so. It's perfectly possible that in due time, there's more than one thread about the same topic, or at least with the same subject-line. "unfollow thread" is the technically correct term
|
I don't think so. It's perfectly possible that in due time, there's more than one thread about the same topic, or at least with the same subject-line. "unfollow thread" is the technically correct term
|
By
ro-esp
· #24537
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
It's hard to have objections.... as I don't know what is talked about. Does anyone care to explain/translate? "munge", "p=" ? groetjes, Ronaldo
|
It's hard to have objections.... as I don't know what is talked about. Does anyone care to explain/translate? "munge", "p=" ? groetjes, Ronaldo
|
By
ro-esp
· #24285
·
|
|
moderated
Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
yes Probably because it requires a shedload of programming, and/or Mark hasn't gotten around to it. No, it needs to be REFINED. We seem to all agree that a *moderator* needs to be able to appoint anot
|
yes Probably because it requires a shedload of programming, and/or Mark hasn't gotten around to it. No, it needs to be REFINED. We seem to all agree that a *moderator* needs to be able to appoint anot
|
By
ro-esp
· #24218
·
|
|
moderated
Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
No, that's not what I meant. If someone with the title of moderator is doing all the work, but has to go away for a while, (s)he needs to be able to promote someone to *moderator*. If the *owner* is m
|
No, that's not what I meant. If someone with the title of moderator is doing all the work, but has to go away for a while, (s)he needs to be able to promote someone to *moderator*. If the *owner* is m
|
By
ro-esp
· #24175
·
|
|
moderated
Restrict "Set Moderator Privileges" Permission
#suggestion
#done
I think there's a lot of consensus here, but not quite the right wording yet. Let me give it a shot: someone with the title of *moderator* should not be able to demote or remove someone with the title
|
I think there's a lot of consensus here, but not quite the right wording yet. Let me give it a shot: someone with the title of *moderator* should not be able to demote or remove someone with the title
|
By
ro-esp
· #24167
·
|
|
moderated
More mod-permission granularity
#suggestion
I'm not sure what "granularity" means here You want moderators to decide what they view and what not? What good is a moderator who can't approve or reject messages, and can't put abusers on moderated?
|
I'm not sure what "granularity" means here You want moderators to decide what they view and what not? What good is a moderator who can't approve or reject messages, and can't put abusers on moderated?
|
By
ro-esp
· #24107
·
|
|
moderated
forcing digests
Does "recent" have a definition? I always assumed that digests were sent out whenever the oldest message in waiting had been there for 24 hours...or as soon as there were 12 messages in the queue If w
|
Does "recent" have a definition? I always assumed that digests were sent out whenever the oldest message in waiting had been there for 24 hours...or as soon as there were 12 messages in the queue If w
|
By
ro-esp
· #23991
·
|
|
moderated
suggested change to use hashtag to control sending megs
#suggestion
then why send it? I don't think so. If I send a message to a group, I want it to be forwarded, not bounced back -- A very busy Nome inside reads Do you mean gnome? So any subscriber would have to visi
|
then why send it? I don't think so. If I send a message to a group, I want it to be forwarded, not bounced back -- A very busy Nome inside reads Do you mean gnome? So any subscriber would have to visi
|
By
ro-esp
· #23990
·
|
|
moderated
Process to propose new features
#meta
I don't have strong feelings as to whether or not we should do it this way, but if we do it this way we need to use terminology that's more clear than "suggestion vs proposal". In my mind those words
|
I don't have strong feelings as to whether or not we should do it this way, but if we do it this way we need to use terminology that's more clear than "suggestion vs proposal". In my mind those words
|
By
ro-esp
· #23909
·
|
|
moderated
Subgroup staging state and scheduled start date/time
#suggestion
"something like "this group will start functioning februari 30th, 18.45 UTC" Nice idea, but why limit it to SUBgroups? groetjes, Ronaldo
|
"something like "this group will start functioning februari 30th, 18.45 UTC" Nice idea, but why limit it to SUBgroups? groetjes, Ronaldo
|
By
ro-esp
· #23897
·
|
|
moderated
RFE: Some ideas for locking topics
#suggestion
Ideally, *in digests*, the indication "this thread is locked" should appear in the content-list of the digest, so people know the thread is locked before reading the messages or even replying to them
|
Ideally, *in digests*, the indication "this thread is locked" should appear in the content-list of the digest, so people know the thread is locked before reading the messages or even replying to them
|
By
ro-esp
· #23782
·
|
|
moderated
wording of the confirmation-request
I'm talking about joining over email. In GMF someone complained that people don't hit reply but send a message to GROUPNAME@groups.io My suggestion is to replace the "please reply to this email" with
|
I'm talking about joining over email. In GMF someone complained that people don't hit reply but send a message to GROUPNAME@groups.io My suggestion is to replace the "please reply to this email" with
|
By
ro-esp
· #23705
·
|
|
moderated
streamlining moderation-suggestion
Hi all So you get an email that there's a message to be reviewed, click the link and see there's list, with a box to tick and who the sender is and what the subject is....but not the actual content. S
|
Hi all So you get an email that there's a message to be reviewed, click the link and see there's list, with a box to tick and who the sender is and what the subject is....but not the actual content. S
|
By
ro-esp
· #23463
·
|
