I have never allowed editing. I think it is, in general, a bad idea. It changes history rather than amending it (via replys to correct) and leaving a trail, and produces different messages via email a

#suggestion

Hats of to you, Mark. Amazing detective work! Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each year. "Still more population growth is not our way to a

#bug

I don't believe so, Mark. It was not someone I even know, although I knew the name/email from his posting in a group I am a member of so I perhaps have read his emails. Weird. Consider Better, not Big

#bug

I'm still having difficulty believing this could happen. This morning I brought up groups.io and noticed that I was logged in as someone else - someone who is in a group that I am a member of. I remov

#bug

So glad to hear there is a limit. Should it be lowered? Since I never reached it, my guess is yes. Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each yea

#suggestion

It appears to me that groups.io has no limit on consecutive unsuccessful logins. This leaves the site open to people and bots guessing passwords and, especially then using them on other (often financi

#suggestion

Not usually the case. I change the subject to make it clearer, especially later on for searches. I still want to be able to maintain and continue the thread as a needed choice. Consider Better, not Bi

#suggestion

I notice that if I change the subject (usually to make it clearer) of an original topic, and someone then replies by email to a previous email (thus the old topic), it starts a new thread. I wonder if

#suggestion

Thanks. Didn't realize that. I would still suggest listing both date and time. Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each year. "Still more popul

#bug

Added to that, I would love to see the date and the time for all instances. Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each year. "Still more populati

#bug

Thanks Mark (I am the one who brought up the "tom" example. I have never been able to find documentation of how search works, for all searchable items, and what fields are searched. That would be help

#bug

I have often found "weidness" in search results which I could not explain. The search for "tom" is the wildest, but the cause of its returning so many false positives may explain others. Consider Bett

#bug

I have tried this in two different groups that I moderate. Thanks. ~Mike

#bug

I do apologize to Catlady for misreading her intent. I do still think the points below are important... ~Mike Groups.io High Level Pricing Concerns: If a current member, without grandfathering, might

#suggestion

Related to Catlady's thinking, Groups.io High Level Pricing Concerns: If a current member, without grandfathering, might not sign on, is that not a clue of an unsustainable pricing structure? If there

#suggestion

Many, perhaps most, business owners are out to please, business schools often say delight, their stake holders. For GIO, this is users and moderators. I only learned of the price and feature changes 2

#update

I have no knowledge of Mark's thinking, and would prefer to let him speak for himself, where he wishes to, rather than have others speak for him. My thoughts are only to express alternative ways to lo

#update

I don't care of the answers. Those represent a thought process that I go through when evaluating a venture. I suggest Mark personally do the same. Rather than just criticizing, why not state your obje

#update

I think more important is for assessing pricing is: How much, Mark, do you feel you need to make from all your endeavors to meet your desires? Within that, how much must come from Groups.io Then, how

#update

I have demanded nothing J Catlady, including non-profit. Where do you get this stuff? What I have suggested, not demanded, is a balance that I believe the present track lacks and reasons behind my thi

#update