Thank so much, Bruce. At home, I am on DSL which for me is only 1Mb. That might sound awful, but email, web browsing and even TV streaming work fine. But the slower speed might amplify the problem - a

#misc

I'm looking at the photos via web, photos, using Chrome. The ones that were there before I changed to: Are about 1 meg. the newer ones uploaded after the 488x488 change are about 150kB Yet the older o

#misc

Hi All (asked on GMF with no response), I reduced photo size to 488x488 hoping to reduce storage needs. I then uploaded some .jpgs, and they ARE smaller. What was about 1MB became about 150KB on uploa

#misc

"I have also changed my mind about yesterday's action of changing 'Reply to' to 'Send to', and have reverted the change." After all the good dialogue, I am disappointed. I think 2 reply-tos to for one

#suggestion

Understand. My thought is for you to stay true to your own (Groups.io) conventions which, IMHO, are among the most consistent and intuitive - you are now a force too. If you see a convention somewhere

#suggestion

In some cases, a sender may not be a member. True? Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each year. "Still more population growth is not our way

#suggestion

Thanks so much for the brainstorming Mark. Another, perhaps better or easier/straighforward solution might be to have two buttons to the left, one "Send to Group" and the other "Send to Sender" - and

#suggestion

Thanks Mark. Now see your point. I think, still, I would retain sender. Me thinks changing terminology is a bigger problem. I don't think "author" is used elsewhere. Consider Better, not Bigger. So ma

#suggestion

It IS the sender. It is probably the author. FURTHER, "sender" is what you use in many other contexts -- why introduce another inconsistency. Reply to sender is everywhere. And then "Reply to Sender"

#suggestion

I think "Sender" is the more recognized. But, the main point is that if "private" is chosen, and even reclicked, "Send" reverts back to "Reply" for both cases. ~Mike

#suggestion

A couple of thoughts, Chris: A single person REPORTED the problem. After much dialog with that person, It is clear to me that it can, and therefore should, be improved. I believe if an app requires us

#suggestion

I think if an extra word or two adds clarity or insight, it is well worth while. ~Mike

#suggestion

And changing "Private" to "Reply Only to Sender" might be clearer and more consistent. On the other hand, the first reply could be a menu to choose one of the two. Consider Better, not Bigger. So many

#suggestion

I don't think just "Send" would work without rework. That is because if you click on "private", the button changes to "reply to sender" from "reply to group" Simplest might be to just change "Reply to

#suggestion

Suggestion: Button Label Clarification for web site reply. I had a person who was confused by needing to hit "Reply" (to compose message) and then hit "Reply to Group". As a result, he never sent his

#suggestion

I can't find an option to see past members. Where is that? Is it not in all versions? Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each year. "Still mor

#misc

I have never allowed editing. I think it is, in general, a bad idea. It changes history rather than amending it (via replys to correct) and leaving a trail, and produces different messages via email a

#suggestion

Hats of to you, Mark. Amazing detective work! Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each year. "Still more population growth is not our way to a

#bug

I don't believe so, Mark. It was not someone I even know, although I knew the name/email from his posting in a group I am a member of so I perhaps have read his emails. Weird. Consider Better, not Big

#bug

I'm still having difficulty believing this could happen. This morning I brought up groups.io and noticed that I was logged in as someone else - someone who is in a group that I am a member of. I remov

#bug