Mike, Just to clarify my objection, I do not object to some facility that would allow you to maintain the thread when you change a subject. I would like you to be required to take some specific action

#suggestion

Hopefully if some change to help with this happens, I hope that it requires the poster to take specific actions to do so leaving everything else the same as it has been. Our group discusses many diffe

#suggestion

To add to the opinions here, I would point out that in our group people don't even ask 99% of the time to have one of us change their email address. They just open a new groups.io account, and go thro

#misc

I think it's too bad that moderators can not unbounce someone when you know it was temporary. If you send a new bounce probe and it is received then we should be able to unbounce them. John P

#misc

I would like to suggest that a mechanism be added to allow moderators to resend the message with the re subscription message in a fashion similar to bouncing email notices. John P

#suggestion

Thank You Bruce. It seems that a number of our users over time have been removed for marking as spam. When I contact them with my gmail address they didn't do it. And when I ask them to carefully exam

#suggestion

Funny this application for membership happened just today. It shows that an account with an incorrect email address is created and changed without being admitted to the group or being confirmed. It's

#bug

I believe it's only talking about the browser and being logged onto groups.io. Being logged in has nothing to do with email, which still may not have been confirmed to the groups.io system. I like the

#bug

Chris Jones wrote: Not necessarily, IMHO. Flagging up too soon might well result in so many false positives that it risks swamping Groups.io with potentially innocent applicants. Chris, agreed. I was

#misc

I would use it and a tool that I could use help determine if it's a spammer before reporting to you. I have had many such attempts to join beginning with all those aol users, but that was more easily

#misc

Not having looked at that field previously I may have been confused here. It could be that only the joined date is displayed and the UTC is NOT the joined time, but rather their time zone setting. Sor

#suggestion #done

I still don't see it. Just the joined date and time. Here is a cut and paste of that line from one of our member. I am a co owner by the way. xxx@... Joined Feb 20 (UTC-04:00)

#suggestion #done

This would be useful, I don't see it looking at a member on our member list. Only joiined. Is this something that only groups.io owners and moderators can see?

#suggestion #done

Our group would not want any of this as mandatory. Many members wish to remain anonymous for varying reasons. Much of this is due to the public's mistrust of privacy concerns.. In this age of gender i

#suggestion

I don't think that's a bug. It appears to me that there is no "active" ckeckbox because it is always active. The control you have here is if you create a direct add notice it's added to the text. If y

#suggestion

It is great that this has been set for a hard bounce. I hate going through the group one by one to inspect the mail history. I have to be honest, I'm still not clear on the anomaly you are referring t

#bug #fixed

Are these from Yahoo and does is say 554.30 This mailbox is disabled? Remember this bounce code from yahoo indicates that the yahoo account has not been used for at least 1 year. So any bounces previo

#bug #fixed

We have had a Bunch of aol new members. It seems strange to me. What is the aol weirdness you speak of? John

#bug

I had read about how groups.io processes bouncing in the wiki and I had also asked about this on the GMF forum. What I found is that a 554.30 mail box disabled is not seen as a hard bounce and will no

#bug #fixed

Our group requires someone to tell us something about why they are interested in our group before we approve. Member notices are active and edited appropriately and are sent to them explaining what we

#suggestion