Mark, I just tried to send a bug report message to this group, and insert (not attach) a screenshot of the error, and I got the exact same error my group member got. It's been difficult and confusing

#bug

It's mysterious for sure. But something is going on!

#suggestion

I checked in my test group, and the NMM1 is working fine. It even works fine when the message is mod-edited. I can't reproduce the bug I reported, and I can't reproduce what Andy is experiencing.

#suggestion

It is absolutely supposed to automatically unmoderate them. This sounds like part of the same bug. It's possible my assumption that the bug was limited to the case of mod-edited messages was erroneous

#suggestion

I just heard back some details from the group member. The first time, he was attaching a pdf. The second time, he was inserting a jpeg. Both times, he got an error message and failure with his first t

#bug

A group member is receiving an error message on trying to attach files to his messages, and then the second time he tries, the attachment goes through and everything is fine. The first try, he gets th

#bug

I just forwarded Mark's announcement to my group. But it strikes me that the info should be made available to all groups. Maybe a banner?

#update

Woo hoo! Congrats, Mark!

#update

I have a new group member whose first message was approved, but only after some editing by me (in conjunction with offlist consultation with her, to improve clarity). We have NMM set to 3. I was about

#suggestion

Mark, how do we get out of the test version?

#update

That is true. I just checked it. It seemed to me before that it was being marked as "claimed" if I even just opened it. But I still think that "claiming" a pending message should be an affirmative act

#bug

I agree. This problem is the reason I had to completely stop even looking at pending messages in the two groups in which I’m a sort of subsidiary mod. The minute I open a message, I’m logged as having

#bug

Yes because you might claim it and reject it. Or do something else with it. Or nothing at all. Why should they not be separate log entries? I do take slight issue, though, with simply opening a pendin

#bug

"turns them into two" Oops, not thinking straight. Of course it turns them into two. Two of them are in the same topic. All is well!

#bug

My bad, wasn't using that. However, when I do use it, I get three results and collapse mysteriously turns them into two. An improvement, though!

#bug

Yes. I used "searching the beta archives" It produced two results, and when collapsed, shrunk down to zero.

#bug

I wanted so much to believe this, but nope. Just tried it, and collapsing wiped out all the results again.

#bug

I mentioned the timeframe because you are probably still working on it. :-)

#bug

I tried it a couple of seconds ago, and got "the search produced no topics" after collapsing a search in quotes that did correctly return messages.

#bug

Happens for me, also, but only with the quotes. Not without.

#bug