Mark, Get well soon! J

#admin

Looks great!

#suggestion

If you go into the member from the Members list, which is what I would virtually always do (and I'm pretty sure is what others here are also referring to), there's no problem with "button rows" or any

#suggestion

Yes, and I can't see any real argument against it. Of course it would be more convenient, as well as more intuitive to some of us. The rest of this discussion - it's "only one less step," etc. - does

#suggestion

Andy, Those are my thoughts exactly. Intuitively, a profile is “about” the member. Not a list of their actions of any particular kind. The “all messages” link there is a nice little extra, but not whe

#suggestion

typo, huge improvement

#suggestion

Yes, it’s “just” one step shorter but it would be a HUGE jmprivfmfmh given (1) the frequency with which you have to do it (”just one little step” is never “nothing” if you have to do it a lot - it’s a

#suggestion

Still too many steps. I still think it should be made available directly from the member page, if not instead of in the profile, then in addition to in the profile. It’s not really a member/profile at

#suggestion

That's the practical argument. The logical argument is that "all messages" is not really part of the profile. It belongs more appropriately in the member page.

#suggestion

Yes but why not avoid that extraneous step and put "all messages" right in the member page.

#suggestion

I agree with Andy I. You have to first be in one of their messages to do that, as outlined in his graphically cumbersome list of steps. The necessity of this sequence (assuming they don't have a viewa

#suggestion

Thd badge shows and the message may have been approved. Buf itis not received by special-notices-only members, which proves that it’s not really sent as a special notice. Try it. You’ll see. It seems

#bug

p.s. The archived reply does have the blue Special badge, but I think that's because badges are a function of the topic, not the message. So maybe there is a display bug where the archived message is

#bug

I don't think that's correct. I thought the same thing about a year(?) ago and we discussed it here. My misunderstanding, like yours, was based on some funkiness around the documentation of special ha

#bug

BTW, if this makes any difference, the attachment was the result of a non-trimmed prior message. Mark looked at the screenshot of the error message (I got stalled in trying to forward him the very lon

#misc

Ok, I've tried every combination I can think of in my test group and I can't reproduce it there - locked hashtag, mods-only hashtag, MFF group, non-MFF group, all work. Yet in my real group, it fails

#bug

Duane, Thanks. That is truly odd. It is completely reproducible for me, to the point where I now expect the behavior. I’ll do some more tests. Are you trying this on the pending first message of a top

#bug

Also: adding a tag manually after the first message has posted does not confer the tag attributes to the topic. Isn't it supposed to, or are tag attributes only operational when you first create the t

#bug

p.s. Yes, the attachment is a jpg of a truck that's been parked on our block beyond the time limit. :)

#misc

Brilliant. That sounds right to me (but what do I know? lol). I don't know if I can push him into that little experiment, though. I'm trying to decide between (1) just trying to forward it to Mark as

#misc