Yay!

That's cumbersome. There's a reason we have a way to get to all of a member's messages without having to find an existing message of theirs first. Chris did post about the actual feature. It's only th

#request

Best to ask these questions in GMF. I'll get back to you in a PM.

#request #wishlist

Lol of course it’s up to Mark. Your verbiage is clearer for sure but also a bit awkward. I’d call it a toss-up.

#request

Remember when Mark said not to debate the value of suggested features (especially if optional and they don’t affect you if you don’t use them)? Well, that applies to this. 😊

#request #wishlist

That said, a one-click reset (by hand) such as your workaround solves would be nice for the other situation.

#request #wishlist

But you're describing a solution to a different problem. The situation I'm trying to solve is when someone who hasn't posted for years (or whatever) suddenly pops up out of the woodwork and starts pos

#request #wishlist

I don't know what you mean by "back end" or "front end." And members always know their posting status in a group, so no, they would know that they've been reset because they would be able to see NuM f

#request #wishlist

This has nothing to do with receiving or not receiving mail, it would be a group option so you wouldn't have to use it if you think it would be confusing, and the use case for my group is members who

#request #wishlist

Thanks, Chris! I suppose it was not obvious to me because (a) I was looking as moderator, and (b) the phrase "by the this member" is a bit off the mark. For an individual member, maybe it could be cha

#request

It would be nice if group members could click on "all my messages" in any individual group. (If this already exists, I don't see it...)

#request

It would be convenient to have an option to automatically reset members to NuM if they haven't posted for a specified period of time.

#request #wishlist

I just assumed that was going to be the case, and I think Mark said so explicitly at one point. I'd have to find the thread. Options to receive or not was part of the whole point....

Mark, I think they absolutely have to be optional for moderators. Whether they're optional for non-mods could possibly be a group setting.

Mark, Thanks. I would make the following changes. I am including here the phrase "via email," which currently is appended to the log entry (but not included in your message) if the message was sent vi

#request

Shal, Totally disagree but I’m done here.

The EU is not requiring it.

At the very least, the phrase "via email" should not be separated from what it refers to. It's very confusing. Thanks for the other info. I would still like to see the message the user receives. But I

#request

To quote Mark, in this thread: "my lawyers interpreted it as I did not have to delete someone's messages in a group when they deleted their account. It's impractical to be able to remove all traces of

That's not what you need to show. It is "hopelessly impractical" in the sense that there will always be cases where it's extremely difficult, if not impossible, to implement. To make a promise in the