|
Expire invitations after 14 days
#suggestion
Jim, The invitation email contains a link "accept the invitation" which IS effectively a login link. That is the problem that was reported, and which precipitated the shorter lifetime for the link. Wh
|
Jim, The invitation email contains a link "accept the invitation" which IS effectively a login link. That is the problem that was reported, and which precipitated the shorter lifetime for the link. Wh
|
By
Shal Farley
· #29172
·
|
|
Strange new "Members" selections
#bug
J, Yes, if there is one or more Pending member it did/does. Much to the confusion of many a new group owner/mod. Shal
|
J, Yes, if there is one or more Pending member it did/does. Much to the confusion of many a new group owner/mod. Shal
|
By
Shal Farley
· #29044
·
|
|
moderated
18 hour latency on sending/receiving Message Approval notice for moderated sender, is this normal?
#bug
Yusuf, No. I generally receive them within moments. Most likely greylisting by the email service used by the responsible person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting_(email) The responsible perso
|
Yusuf, No. I generally receive them within moments. Most likely greylisting by the email service used by the responsible person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting_(email) The responsible perso
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28992
·
|
|
better member list filtering
#suggestion
Mark, I'm loving it. Cant wait to see the idea applied to more lists. Maybe to the right of the Search box, as they are two sides of the same coin. [tangent] And then on the Messages/Topics lists drag
|
Mark, I'm loving it. Cant wait to see the idea applied to more lists. Maybe to the right of the Search box, as they are two sides of the same coin. [tangent] And then on the Messages/Topics lists drag
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28991
·
|
|
moderated
#suggestion feature request to strip out duplicate attachments in replies
#suggestion
David wrote: Hmm... Taken together with Mark's comment I think that brings us back to the original request from Donald (the OP): to strip the duplicates. But for embedded images maybe only in the case
|
David wrote: Hmm... Taken together with Mark's comment I think that brings us back to the original request from Donald (the OP): to strip the duplicates. But for embedded images maybe only in the case
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28972
·
|
|
moderated
#suggestion feature request to strip out duplicate attachments in replies
#suggestion
Bruce, This may have changed, since the post is from 2015, but I'm guessing only in detail: "When we receive an email, we pull all the attachments out of the message and store them elsewhere (Amazon S
|
Bruce, This may have changed, since the post is from 2015, but I'm guessing only in detail: "When we receive an email, we pull all the attachments out of the message and store them elsewhere (Amazon S
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28971
·
|
|
moderated
#suggestion feature request to strip out duplicate attachments in replies
#suggestion
Hi Ken S, In what I proposed it would still be shown there. I proposed consolidating the storage rather than "stripping out" the duplicate. I'm not quite sure what difficulty you're seeing. Images and
|
Hi Ken S, In what I proposed it would still be shown there. I proposed consolidating the storage rather than "stripping out" the duplicate. I'm not quite sure what difficulty you're seeing. Images and
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28965
·
|
|
moderated
#suggestion feature request to strip out duplicate attachments in replies
#suggestion
Ken S, You quoted me, so I'll answer. Though I'm not sure you're addressing the implementation that I was discussing with ken (K). Why would you want to turn it off? What I suggested makes no changes
|
Ken S, You quoted me, so I'll answer. Though I'm not sure you're addressing the implementation that I was discussing with ken (K). Why would you want to turn it off? What I suggested makes no changes
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28954
·
|
|
moderated
#suggestion feature request to strip out duplicate attachments in replies
#suggestion
ken, That would be feasible in the web view of the messages. The reply would have the URL of the original image placed in its HTML <img> element, replacing whatever src reference it had on arrival. Wh
|
ken, That would be feasible in the web view of the messages. The reply would have the URL of the original image placed in its HTML <img> element, replacing whatever src reference it had on arrival. Wh
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28949
·
|
|
moderated
#suggestion Implement threaded view like Yahoo groups used to have before 'neo'.
#suggestion
I wrote: The simplest method I can think of would be to add an "In Reply To" link just below the message's date and permalink: To avoid clutter omit it on messages that are in reply to the immediately
|
I wrote: The simplest method I can think of would be to add an "In Reply To" link just below the message's date and permalink: To avoid clutter omit it on messages that are in reply to the immediately
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28948
·
|
|
moderated
Allow adding attachment in an edit
#suggestion
J, I'd like this too. Also for Pending messages. In reference to concerns that have been raised by others in this topic, I agree with J and don't see a "consistency of the record" problem with this th
|
J, I'd like this too. Also for Pending messages. In reference to concerns that have been raised by others in this topic, I agree with J and don't see a "consistency of the record" problem with this th
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28929
·
|
|
moderated
"Republish wiki page"
#suggestion
J, Are you looking to send the entire page content in that message, or simply repeat the "Notify Members" function (which sends a link to the page)? Shal
|
J, Are you looking to send the entire page content in that message, or simply repeat the "Notify Members" function (which sends a link to the page)? Shal
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28928
·
|
|
moderated
#suggestion Implement threaded view like Yahoo groups used to have before 'neo'.
#suggestion
YSWT wrote: For example: https://www.flickr.com/photos/shalf/10130294473/in/album-72157636272401705/ Sort of a combination of the single message view: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/28905 With
|
YSWT wrote: For example: https://www.flickr.com/photos/shalf/10130294473/in/album-72157636272401705/ Sort of a combination of the single message view: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/28905 With
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28918
·
|
|
moderated
RSS feeds for private groups?
#suggestion
Colin, Huh? HTTPS does nothing to authenticate that the person using the URL even has an account at Groups.io, much less is a member of the specific group. A member-specific token (hashed) helps somew
|
Colin, Huh? HTTPS does nothing to authenticate that the person using the URL even has an account at Groups.io, much less is a member of the specific group. A member-specific token (hashed) helps somew
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28864
·
|
|
moderated
Member receiving msgs from non-subscribed groups
#bug
Ken, Have him look in the message footer, next to the Unsubscribe link. That shows the email address to which that message was sent. If it shows his address, then most likely he is subscribed to the g
|
Ken, Have him look in the message footer, next to the Unsubscribe link. That shows the email address to which that message was sent. If it shows his address, then most likely he is subscribed to the g
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28519
·
|
|
moderated
unify moderation response
#suggestion
Glenn, That use case is already covered by the link at the top of the email: "View this message online". I believe that link used to be below the quoted message, where the others are, but it was #sugg
|
Glenn, That use case is already covered by the link at the top of the email: "View this message online". I believe that link used to be below the quoted message, where the others are, but it was #sugg
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28479
·
|
|
moderated
unify moderation response
#suggestion
Glenn, I don't understand what you're asking for. Currently, the only way in which the member is informed of the approval is that they see the approved message appear in the group's Messages, and/or i
|
Glenn, I don't understand what you're asking for. Currently, the only way in which the member is informed of the approval is that they see the approved message appear in the group's Messages, and/or i
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28458
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
Dano, I have no evidence, but I think it may be your experience that is the exception. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In any case, a modification could be that the member may not have subscriptions to any groups that you
|
Dano, I have no evidence, but I think it may be your experience that is the exception. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In any case, a modification could be that the member may not have subscriptions to any groups that you
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28338
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
J, Coffee time (for you or for me*)?. If the member joins another group before the baddie acts, then the mitigation prevents the nefarious act. If the baddie acts first it is the baddie's own address
|
J, Coffee time (for you or for me*)?. If the member joins another group before the baddie acts, then the mitigation prevents the nefarious act. If the baddie acts first it is the baddie's own address
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28336
·
|
|
moderated
Changing email address security issue
#misc
Christos, The catch-22 is that in the baddie scenario the baddie controls the new mailbox. So allowing the baddie to confirm their own misdeed adds no security. On the other hand, in the use-case scen
|
Christos, The catch-22 is that in the baddie scenario the baddie controls the new mailbox. So allowing the baddie to confirm their own misdeed adds no security. On the other hand, in the use-case scen
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28333
·
|
