Andy, It is extremely unhelpful, but you can thank Gmail for that banner of misinformation. That's the actual response given by Groups.io when Gmail attempted that message delivery. I'm sure Mark wish

#suggestion

Hank, No. That is exactly the difference between the "No Email" and "Special Notices Only" choices in the Email Delivery panel of each member's Subscription page. You can check the "Disable No Email"

#suggestion

Ken, Beta really isn't the venue for lessons in how internet mail works (nothing here Mark doesn't know), but that's not quite how it works. What the spam-puter "gets back" is either a "success" code

#suggestion

Andy, You missed my point about addressee responses and server responses. During the transaction when the sender (legit or spammer) connects to Groups.io to deliver the message Groups.io has only two

#suggestion

Andy, That's true of a reply by the addressee. But I don't think it is true of either a rejection or a deferred bounce by the receiving service. Confirming that the service exists doesn't tell the spa

#suggestion

Marc wrote: Elaborating on that, in the discussion on GMF I expressed surprise that such messages weren't being rejected during the delivery transaction, as "rejected" was the word used in the Activit

#suggestion

Drew, Or perhaps convert it into a Remove Quote function, in case you don't want it there. That's the real trick. I believe that it has been suggested long ago in beta, both in terms of the Quote Mess

#suggestion

Jim, The invitation email contains a link "accept the invitation" which IS effectively a login link. That is the problem that was reported, and which precipitated the shorter lifetime for the link. Wh

#suggestion

J, Yes, if there is one or more Pending member it did/does. Much to the confusion of many a new group owner/mod. Shal

#bug

Yusuf, No. I generally receive them within moments. Most likely greylisting by the email service used by the responsible person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting_(email) The responsible perso

#bug

Mark, I'm loving it. Cant wait to see the idea applied to more lists. Maybe to the right of the Search box, as they are two sides of the same coin. [tangent] And then on the Messages/Topics lists drag

#suggestion

David wrote: Hmm... Taken together with Mark's comment I think that brings us back to the original request from Donald (the OP): to strip the duplicates. But for embedded images maybe only in the case

#suggestion

Bruce, This may have changed, since the post is from 2015, but I'm guessing only in detail: "When we receive an email, we pull all the attachments out of the message and store them elsewhere (Amazon S

#suggestion

Hi Ken S, In what I proposed it would still be shown there. I proposed consolidating the storage rather than "stripping out" the duplicate. I'm not quite sure what difficulty you're seeing. Images and

#suggestion

Ken S, You quoted me, so I'll answer. Though I'm not sure you're addressing the implementation that I was discussing with ken (K). Why would you want to turn it off? What I suggested makes no changes

#suggestion

ken, That would be feasible in the web view of the messages. The reply would have the URL of the original image placed in its HTML <img> element, replacing whatever src reference it had on arrival. Wh

#suggestion

I wrote: The simplest method I can think of would be to add an "In Reply To" link just below the message's date and permalink: To avoid clutter omit it on messages that are in reply to the immediately

#suggestion

J, I'd like this too. Also for Pending messages. In reference to concerns that have been raised by others in this topic, I agree with J and don't see a "consistency of the record" problem with this th

#suggestion

J, Are you looking to send the entire page content in that message, or simply repeat the "Notify Members" function (which sends a link to the page)? Shal

#suggestion

YSWT wrote: For example: https://www.flickr.com/photos/shalf/10130294473/in/album-72157636272401705/ Sort of a combination of the single message view: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/28905 With

#suggestion