The sub-group sounds like a good idea - we have working groups in our organisation to facilitate exactly this, which is what your unmoderated sub-group would effectively be. kind regards Nick ___ dUNM

#meta

Unless I’ve misunderstood or missed a key post, surely that’s up to each group owner to work out for themselves?The person who sets up or ‘owns’ the group is responsible for and pays the hosting fee,

Well, top marks for being able to respond as you have. I think that’s pretty excellent and testimony to the success of the groups.io platform that as many as have, wish to move over to it. Thanks for

As another European (UK, where we know a thing or two about divisive politics 😉), I agree with Victoria’s comment above. However, were my political views more different, I might feel that I did not wi

That seems sensible to me. best Nick ___ dUNMUR | member of the AOP

Agreed - that’s a mod’s job… best Nick __ dUNMUR | member of the Association of Photographers http://www.nickdunmur.com http://www.the-aop.org

#suggestion

I think the proposal was for it to be an option, so you wouldn’t have to take it. best Nick __ dUNMUR | member of the Association of Photographers http://www.nickdunmur.com http://www.the-aop.org

#suggestion

If you’re writing commercially, you will likely have a contract of some sort and if you’ve granted rights to that publication under that contract, GDPR will not over-ride it. kind regards Nick ___ dUN

Not true. The right to erasure is not an absolute right. It is all laid out here <https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/individual-rights/right-to-e

I presume this would be an option, if implemented? All the folk who use our groups do so via email - pretty much no-one uses the web interface. Likewise, any idea of auto-deleting images that are atta

#suggestion

Quite. There is quite a lot of scaremongering and misinformation out there. The ICO are not going to be pursuing small groups that inadvertently have not interpreted things correctly - one might get a

Hi Liam, I’m interested in what evidence you have seen that this is so? I am involved in a number of UK/EU government roundtable departmental meetings (connected with intellectual property) in which t

:-) kind regards Nick __ ‌dUNMUR‌ | member of the AOP‌

Top of the page in ‘Members’ - there is a Search box. kind regards Nick __ ‌dUNMUR‌ | member of the AOP‌

Thanks Shal, I’ve reached that conclusion myself. Your question is certainly valid - as you say, I haven’t set out all the circumstances so I appreciate it might be difficult for others to take a view

I agree totally re not notifying people - that would be bad. My worry is that duplicate messages confuse and the sub-group would never be an active part of the main group Kind regards Nick __ dUNMUR |

Dear all, I wish to create a new sub-group of my main group, and will be using the Direct Add feature to get their names and email addresses registered and active. However, I wish to only allow postin

Picking up on this thread, I can add a URL into the footer, which becomes a clickable link upon sending, but I am interested in being able to have a small logo/image-file (png or jpeg file). Doesn't h

I’d certainly agree there - the platform is excellent. kind regards Nick __ dUNMUR | member of the Association of Photographers http://www.nickdunmur.com http://www.the-aop.org Nick Dunmur Limited is

Thanks Mark. I am still concerned about this, though; It is good that the rights granted are restricted to the provision and operation of the service but ‘User Content’ will necessarily include any at