I fully agree with having a general philosophy that encourages the less civil folks to seek out existing venues like Reddit instead. Having seen that behavior on both those platforms (and yeah, I get

I agree that the moderator needs to be the responsible party to the utmost extent possible. Members also need to be responsible and leave any group t hey feel is not respectful. After enough people le

Firstly: Yay databases! Now a couple quick thoughts off top. Expansions to Types of fields: Images Hyperlinks (include ability to have text in place of the actual link, consistent with hyperlinks else

#suggestion

That would be very cool, I think both would be best. Then you can categorize your group as close as you can, but add tags to clarify.

I use the all messages screen as it is. It lets me see who posted and when not just recent activity at a glance. It's my preferred view as a start point. That said, so long as it remains available, I

That's amazing! I think you just made a few RPG groups VERY excited. Also maybe Freecycler-types? GREAT call on Orgs.

I personally would not want that in a group. Having it as an option seems fine, so long as groups have the choice to allow or not. Or else make a management page where the Owner can view and select to

Looks good as a starting point. I think I can see a couple of things that would help: 1) Rotation option. 2) Sub-folders (for photo-intensive groups, I would assume this would be pretty important.) I

Wiki works great. Thanks for the quick fix, Mark!

#changelog

Hi Mark, We made a new wiki page with a hastag in the title. When one clicks on the link, however, it takes us to the main page instead. It somehow causes the groupname/wiki/pagename#1 to become group

#bug

I like 6 and 26 myself.

>On the group home page, for people who cannot see the archives (not a subscriber and the group has private archives, for example), they no longer see Top Hashtags/Top >Posters/Recent Photos or Messag

I believe it is available when you create the link. There's a check box as I recall. I've set mine up to do same page rather than new, so I know it can be done.

Deed is done, group is warned. Tell me what you need next, I'll make it happen.

The ones I have are so old I don't think the members would be able to be contacted. There's one that might be able to be contacted though. I did just find a feature they have that might be worth cloni

I think people will learn where it is. I say try it out and see. Thanks!

Hi Mark, Thanks for this thread. As someone who has used Groups primarily to game with, I'll apply that lens to illustrate why I would prefer slightly different choices. * It helps the feel of a game

I like the look of it. I have no problem with how it looks currently, but the new look is more consistent and easier to understand I think. Nice work!

On that same front, I just noted that Wikis are not able to be set to public viewing. Some groups might want that, if possible to do. Or maybe to be able to mark certain pages as public at least. EDIT

On that same subject, I created a group, more as a test, not intending it to be active necessarily, but RPG groups may want to look at it to see how such a thing could be done on IO. https://groups.io