I found the what by "see all messages in this thread". Apparently I missed some of the 50 messages. Maybe Mark can present a provisional version to see whether we like it groetjes, Ronaldo

#update

I 'm still not sure what we are talking about. To WHOM will be shown WHAT? I 'm guessing the whom is current members and ex-members of the group, who weren't banned. As to the what... - changes in del

#update

Hopefully not. :-)

#update

The more I thought about the feature the more I like this 3rd option but from an implementation POV. Since the feature is ready more or less except the content inclusion, just release it with the memb

#update

Amen to mod activities staying private. The prospect of even some of them becoming visible to members is very alarming.

#update

I'm with Marina. Let's allow subscribers to view only those activities that they've initiated. To do otherwise seems far too complicated, and virtually impossible for poor Nina to document. Regards, B

#update

Oh, sorry, Duane, you said Member Activity "in the group log." I agree. A good starting place.

#update

Not ideal. All mod actions on the member are shown there, including "edited moderator notes." I assume that list was Mark's starting position anyway. It needs to be pared down (and/or customized).

#update

In that case, if they can never see colors, it makes no sense to me to inform them of changes to it. ?????? It’s totally anslogous to mod notes, which everyone seems to agree should not have changes s

#update

Even with the member list visible to members, the color field isn't shown to them. Duane

#update

A third option, and the that would be my strong preference although I doubt it would fly here, is to show only the member per se’s actual activities (not any mod actions), as the name implies (“your a

#update

ps On “how can they see their color,” I assumed from Andy W’s post that they had to be able to see it in his group (because of the member list being visible to them), otherwise why on earth would he w

#update

Duane, I agree and was just about to suggest something like that as an afterthought. However, failing such customization I feel the additions should hold to “do no harm.” If color changes, for example

#update

How can they see their color? I just checked and a member doesn't see which color has been assigned to them. If there were an option in the Extra Member Data for Color, visible in their Profile, then

#update

And to expand on that specifically, as I've already said: the major disruption to groups like ours, where members can't even see their colors, would be questions to mods along the lines of, "What does

#update

I don't think your point is valid or analogous to mine. When considereing an enhancement that consists of a major change, I think the principle should be "do no harm." Members' lack of ability to see

#update

That was my point when you wrote: Regards Andy

#update

Don’t assume every group uses colors the same way you do. It is info that is private to mods in my group. Red = problematic, green = receptive/cooperative, etc. In my group (and many groups) only mods

#update

We use colours to denote membership status based upon achievement so have absolutely no reason to exclude this. If member has asked us to change any extra data that is visible to them or their posting

#update

And there's this. I agree here, too. These are not "your" actions if "your" refers to the member.

#update