|
formatting an indented line issue [no can do]
#bug
One more observation. There are four buttons to control ordered and unordered lists. Were you using the style selection buttons (first row on the editing toolbar) or just the Indent / outdent buttons
|
One more observation. There are four buttons to control ordered and unordered lists. Were you using the style selection buttons (first row on the editing toolbar) or just the Indent / outdent buttons
|
By
David Bryant
· #29190
·
|
|
formatting an indented line issue [no can do]
#bug
I ran a little test, and it seems to work OK with a bulleted list. This is a test. Is there really a bug? Maybe so. Then again, maybe not. It seems to be working for me. Increase indent. Decrease inde
|
I ran a little test, and it seems to work OK with a bulleted list. This is a test. Is there really a bug? Maybe so. Then again, maybe not. It seems to be working for me. Increase indent. Decrease inde
|
By
David Bryant
· #29189
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
I don't believe they're intended to be sentences, just log entries giving basic information, which I believe they do. Duane
|
I don't believe they're intended to be sentences, just log entries giving basic information, which I believe they do. Duane
|
By
Duane
· #29188
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
J, this is what you wrote: "I don’t think we’re aiming for great literature here." Your words, not mine. And then: "It's a log entry. It's not literature." Again, those were your words, not mine. I ne
|
J, this is what you wrote: "I don’t think we’re aiming for great literature here." Your words, not mine. And then: "It's a log entry. It's not literature." Again, those were your words, not mine. I ne
|
By
Andy
· #29187
·
|
|
formatting an indented line issue [no can do]
#bug
When one indents a line (or lines) one cannot outdent (or for that matter further indent) a line or lines that follows the indented pp. Lines 2,3,4 below were indented after typing them. One cannot su
|
When one indents a line (or lines) one cannot outdent (or for that matter further indent) a line or lines that follows the indented pp. Lines 2,3,4 below were indented after typing them. One cannot su
|
By
KWKloeber
· #29186
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
It's almost all of them and many of us have noticed this for years. If people want correct sentences, one solution is to get rid of sentences and just use log-speak. And you DID accuse me of wanting t
|
It's almost all of them and many of us have noticed this for years. If people want correct sentences, one solution is to get rid of sentences and just use log-speak. And you DID accuse me of wanting t
|
By
J_Catlady
· #29185
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
J wrote: "You're the one who wants it to be literature, classical or otherwise." I never said that. I want the log entries to make sense. They don't. " I keep saying it's not literature and it shouldn
|
J wrote: "You're the one who wants it to be literature, classical or otherwise." I never said that. I want the log entries to make sense. They don't. " I keep saying it's not literature and it shouldn
|
By
Andy
· #29184
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
The root cause of confusion is that the Log combines two actions into one entry. One can attempt to "figure it out" or justify it combining them, but that's the truth. There are simply and unequivocab
|
The root cause of confusion is that the Log combines two actions into one entry. One can attempt to "figure it out" or justify it combining them, but that's the truth. There are simply and unequivocab
|
By
KWKloeber
· #29183
·
|
|
Unable to delete pending message claimed by another Moderator
#bug
Hi Mark, I have a pending message on one subgroup (clams@tvam.groups.io) that was initially claimed by my co-owner. When I try to delete it via the website, clicking the Yes button on the confirmation
|
Hi Mark, I have a pending message on one subgroup (clams@tvam.groups.io) that was initially claimed by my co-owner. When I try to delete it via the website, clicking the Yes button on the confirmation
|
By
Andy Wedge
· #29182
·
|
|
Expire invitations after 14 days
#suggestion
Thanks Shal, Yes, Bruce pointed this out to me. I didn't know it worked like that. Would it not be better if it did not have that function, but simply required an email reply? The recipient must alrea
|
Thanks Shal, Yes, Bruce pointed this out to me. I didn't know it worked like that. Would it not be better if it did not have that function, but simply required an email reply? The recipient must alrea
|
By
Jim Fisher
· #29181
·
|
|
Expire invitations after 14 days
#suggestion
I noticed a similar security problem when my group first migrated to groups.io in 2019. I had set up a small task force to evaluate Mark's software before bringing all 1,000 members over from yahoo.co
|
I noticed a similar security problem when my group first migrated to groups.io in 2019. I had set up a small task force to evaluate Mark's software before bringing all 1,000 members over from yahoo.co
|
By
David Bryant
· #29180
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
typo - marking the message as spam
|
typo - marking the message as spam
|
By
J_Catlady
· #29179
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
Here's a suggestion besides the commas or the dash or the upper-casing. It seems to be the sentence format that's bothering some of you. So do away with that and don't even try to make the entry into
|
Here's a suggestion besides the commas or the dash or the upper-casing. It seems to be the sentence format that's bothering some of you. So do away with that and don't even try to make the entry into
|
By
J_Catlady
· #29178
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
Ths user did the triggering action (in this case, marking themselves as spam), and that is always the case in these log entries. The log entry always refers to the user's originating action.
|
Ths user did the triggering action (in this case, marking themselves as spam), and that is always the case in these log entries. The log entry always refers to the user's originating action.
|
By
J_Catlady
· #29177
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
You're the one who wants it to be literature, classical or otherwise. I keep saying it's not literature and it shouldn't be. Read my posts. It's a simple log, and as such, it should be allowed to spea
|
You're the one who wants it to be literature, classical or otherwise. I keep saying it's not literature and it shouldn't be. Read my posts. It's a simple log, and as such, it should be allowed to spea
|
By
J_Catlady
· #29176
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
Not true.. The user did not remove him/herself. The user took no action in the removal, were it via the web or via email. If the user was the one taking the action then the user would have chosen "don
|
Not true.. The user did not remove him/herself. The user took no action in the removal, were it via the web or via email. If the user was the one taking the action then the user would have chosen "don
|
By
KWKloeber
· #29175
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
I suspect that's incorrect. I base this on the fact that if you go to an old log entry for something that has been deleted, the link will still try to take you to it. Also that you can download the lo
|
I suspect that's incorrect. I base this on the fact that if you go to an old log entry for something that has been deleted, the link will still try to take you to it. Also that you can download the lo
|
By
Duane
· #29174
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
J, My assumption is that the actual activity data is not stored as human-readable text files with text sentences. I'd assume that there is a bit (or a few bits) that means, "This person was removed be
|
J, My assumption is that the actual activity data is not stored as human-readable text files with text sentences. I'd assume that there is a bit (or a few bits) that means, "This person was removed be
|
By
Andy
· #29173
·
|
|
Expire invitations after 14 days
#suggestion
Jim, The invitation email contains a link "accept the invitation" which IS effectively a login link. That is the problem that was reported, and which precipitated the shorter lifetime for the link. Wh
|
Jim, The invitation email contains a link "accept the invitation" which IS effectively a login link. That is the problem that was reported, and which precipitated the shorter lifetime for the link. Wh
|
By
Shal Farley
· #29172
·
|
|
"Was removed via email" versus "reported ... via email and was removed"
#suggestion
You suggested an improvement to make *one* of them less inaccurate [sic]. Your approach to improvment would require going through each activity one by one and creating a customized log entry for each.
|
You suggested an improvement to make *one* of them less inaccurate [sic]. Your approach to improvment would require going through each activity one by one and creating a customized log entry for each.
|
By
J_Catlady
· #29171
·
|
