|
moderated
Group owners manual reviewers
#misc
Hi All, I have a first, rough draft of a group owner's manual. I'd like to get it in front of a couple experienced group owners for feedback: is it going in the right direction, are there any glaring
Hi All, I have a first, rough draft of a group owner's manual. I'd like to get it in front of a couple experienced group owners for feedback: is it going in the right direction, are there any glaring
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #23994
·
|
|
moderated
Ad blocker warning
#misc
It was a classifieds list and the link was to a product. Completely legit. Mark
It was a classifieds list and the link was to a product. Completely legit. Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #24100
·
|
|
moderated
Ad blocker warning
#misc
Hi All, A group owner was having a problem. There were some links in messages that were just not showing up in their browser, both when reviewing pending messages on the website and when viewing the a
Hi All, A group owner was having a problem. There were some links in messages that were just not showing up in their browser, both when reviewing pending messages on the website and when viewing the a
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #24089
·
|
|
moderated
Ad blocker warning
#misc
We went through something similar almost 5 years ago with the GIO login page, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/47008 My fault that time. Duane
We went through something similar almost 5 years ago with the GIO login page, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/47008 My fault that time. Duane
|
By
Duane
· #24090
·
|
|
moderated
Ad blocker warning
#misc
But why were those googleadservices links in ther message in the first place? Do we presume it was an open group and some spammer had posted them? Most of us try and avoid these sort of links which is
But why were those googleadservices links in ther message in the first place? Do we presume it was an open group and some spammer had posted them? Most of us try and avoid these sort of links which is
|
By
Dave Sergeant
· #24097
·
|
|
moderated
App is starting to become accessible
#misc
Hi All, A lot of work on accessibility was just merged into the app. It's not complete (like the app itself), but many of the screens and menus should be accessible now. If you use a screen reader on
Hi All, A lot of work on accessibility was just merged into the app. It's not complete (like the app itself), but many of the screens and menus should be accessible now. If you use a screen reader on
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #24195
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
This would frustrate our users who receive software patches via the project's mailing list. Git takes patch author information from e-mail headers. Right now we have git hooks in place on the server t
This would frustrate our users who receive software patches via the project's mailing list. Git takes patch author information from e-mail headers. Right now we have git hooks in place on the server t
|
By
Michael Halstead
· #24286
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
I'm objecting to this. This would munge From for everybody. It'd be disruptive, and for what? What's the sense? p=none means no rejection. People (including me) make DMARC records with p=none in the b
I'm objecting to this. This would munge From for everybody. It'd be disruptive, and for what? What's the sense? p=none means no rejection. People (including me) make DMARC records with p=none in the b
|
By
Lena
· #24281
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
Hi All, Right now, we munge the From line of messages for people who have DMARC records of p=reject or p=quarantine. We do not do that for people who have DMARC records of p=none. I propose changing t
Hi All, Right now, we munge the From line of messages for people who have DMARC records of p=reject or p=quarantine. We do not do that for people who have DMARC records of p=none. I propose changing t
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #24260
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
My objection would be that it makes it more difficult for people to reply directly to sender from email. OK, I know there is a 'reply to sender' at the bottom of the mail but many don't see this. I co
My objection would be that it makes it more difficult for people to reply directly to sender from email. OK, I know there is a 'reply to sender' at the bottom of the mail but many don't see this. I co
|
By
Dave Sergeant
· #24261
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
Another thought. Currently plain text versions of group mails do not contain the 'reply to sender' option in the footer, only in the html version if it exists. If this is to be implemented can we add
Another thought. Currently plain text versions of group mails do not contain the 'reply to sender' option in the footer, only in the html version if it exists. If this is to be implemented can we add
|
By
Dave Sergeant
· #24262
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
Dave, The reason has to do with the fact that those are mailto links, and they necessarily include the text of the subject line. They'd be sizeable and quite ugly as URLs in plain text. Maybe call it
Dave, The reason has to do with the fact that those are mailto links, and they necessarily include the text of the subject line. They'd be sizeable and quite ugly as URLs in plain text. Maybe call it
|
By
Shal Farley
· #24263
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
It's hard to have objections.... as I don't know what is talked about. Does anyone care to explain/translate? "munge", "p=" ? groetjes, Ronaldo
It's hard to have objections.... as I don't know what is talked about. Does anyone care to explain/translate? "munge", "p=" ? groetjes, Ronaldo
|
By
ro-esp
· #24285
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/munge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC#DNS_record Best, Glenn
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/munge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC#DNS_record Best, Glenn
|
By
Glenn Glazer
· #24287
·
|
|
moderated
Change DMARC behavior for p=none
#misc
In my experience, people who are interested in adding a DMARC record for their domain start with setting one up with p=none. Then they go through and audit the reports on their domain. They see that w
In my experience, people who are interested in adding a DMARC record for their domain start with setting one up with p=none. Then they go through and audit the reports on their domain. They see that w
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #24288
·
|
|
moderated
Almost completed version of the Owners and Moderators manual
#misc
I have the inclination (and even the skill, I used to work as a proofreader), but before I can tell you if I have the time, can you give me an idea of how long it is? Best, Glenn
I have the inclination (and even the skill, I used to work as a proofreader), but before I can tell you if I have the time, can you give me an idea of how long it is? Best, Glenn
|
By
Glenn Glazer
· #24446
·
|
|
moderated
Almost completed version of the Owners and Moderators manual
#misc
The PDF is 75 pages. Thanks, Mark
The PDF is 75 pages. Thanks, Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #24447
·
|
|
moderated
Almost completed version of the Owners and Moderators manual
#misc
Hi All, Our tireless and fearless tech writer Nina has mostly completed the Owners and Moderators manual and it is ready for review. I have uploaded a PDF of it to the Files section of the https://bet
Hi All, Our tireless and fearless tech writer Nina has mostly completed the Owners and Moderators manual and it is ready for review. I have uploaded a PDF of it to the Files section of the https://bet
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #24445
·
|
|
moderated
account display name vs group display name change issues
#misc
Since ultimately and logically the Display Name is a group, and not an account, variable, I would do away with the ability to edit display names from the account page altogether. Let people set their
Since ultimately and logically the Display Name is a group, and not an account, variable, I would do away with the ability to edit display names from the account page altogether. Let people set their
|
By
J_Catlady
· #25975
·
|
|
moderated
account display name vs group display name change issues
#misc
No, I disagree. The issue here is that display name changes in the account profile are propagated to (sub)group profiles regardless of whether a value has already been set in the (sub)group. This is i
No, I disagree. The issue here is that display name changes in the account profile are propagated to (sub)group profiles regardless of whether a value has already been set in the (sub)group. This is i
|
By
Andy Wedge
· #25976
·
|