I agree and I've had a few members who were thoroughly confused by this. I think a clearer construction would be two radio buttons, one for "Group" and one for "Sender" (since the word "Sender" is use

#suggestion

I rarely ever send Private replies. But when I do, I have a problem: It's hard for me to tell when the message will be Private, and when it won't. In both cases, there is a "Private" button near the l

#suggestion

This is a reply to an old thread, because the same thing happened again. Not fixed yet. What I did: I wrote a reply in a group using the web interface, then clicked the green "Reply to Group" button t

#bug

I just recently noticed that #cal-reminders contain an invite.ics file as an attachment. In fact, not just one, but two. I thought only #cal-invites were supposed to have these. Although they're small

#suggestion

Changes to the site this week: April 28, 2022: BUGFIX: April 27, 2022: If Force HTML Emails and Plain Text Only group settings are both checked, we should take the plain text part of a message and use

#changelog

(First, belated reply to Andy in previous message: yes, I did realize that eventually. Thanks.) There is another weirdness. I may be completely misremembering, but did Send Message (from the member pa

#bug

Hi Mark, Thanks and it works great, and yes the HTML footers are nicer. The text-only footers are not bad either, maybe just a bit spartan. :) Cheers, Christos

#bug #suggestion

Hello, I've fixed this. The "Plain Text Only" setting extracts the plain text part of a message (almost all emails have both plain text and HTML parts) and creates a new email with just the plain text

#bug #suggestion

Whoops. Fixed. Thanks, Mark

#bug

An update on this. I was told that allowing both was intentional because folks wanted to have Plain Text groups but also wanted to include the "Reply To Sender" link in the footer which is there on th

#bug #suggestion

Janet, I believe that Mark was not talking about the default action, which remains to send these messages from the person, not the +owner. He was talking about exactly what text is displayed in the "F

#bug

How you are feeling that day doesn't matter. What it's about doesn't matter. The fact is that by definition, you are acting as a moderator simply by using that feature. Because only moderators have ac

#suggestion

I fundamentally disagree. If I choose to send a message to a member, it could be about anything and is almost certainly not Moderator function related. Regards Andy

#suggestion

Hi Mark, >>> This has been fixed. It looks like you forgot to add the @ before the UserName in the URL as it still redirects when it shouldn't. >>> Note that if a user's profile is not accessible to t

#bug

Yes, I agree with that.

#suggestion

You pretty much agreed with what I proposed, if you notice all the admin "Send Message" routes use the admin/mod From:, anything else uses the personal From:. Cheers, Christos >>> Here is why they sho

#suggestion

Oh, wait, then this has nothing to do with New Topic? Sorry, maybe I did misread! I was all wound up in the whole conversation about making that "consistent" etc.

#bug

This has been fixed. Note that if a user's profile is not accessible to the member, then they will be redirected to the group home page. Thanks, Mark

#bug

I'm perplexed - when I view the member list in a group for which I'm not a moderator or owner, there are no row links. Pete

#bug

J I believe you misread my message. I have not changed any defaults. I've only changed the From line from messages sent from the +owner address. Mark

#bug