|
Group Sponsorships
#update
RE: Free/Basic groups can allow sponsorships. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sound like Free/Basic groups are not able to Allow Sponsorships. But, rather Free/Basic groups must upgrade to a Premium g
RE: Free/Basic groups can allow sponsorships. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sound like Free/Basic groups are not able to Allow Sponsorships. But, rather Free/Basic groups must upgrade to a Premium g
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27877
·
|
|
Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
If only my current members are grandfathered, a $2.50 user paywall would stop any new members from joining my group. It would die. This is why any group member charge (vs system user paywall subscript
If only my current members are grandfathered, a $2.50 user paywall would stop any new members from joining my group. It would die. This is why any group member charge (vs system user paywall subscript
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27867
·
|
|
Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
RE: "Second, you're already grandfathered in, as I understand it." Again, being "already grandfathered" would be inconsequential, if a $2.50 paywall was added in front of us.
RE: "Second, you're already grandfathered in, as I understand it." Again, being "already grandfathered" would be inconsequential, if a $2.50 paywall was added in front of us.
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27865
·
|
|
Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
"Everyone" paying $2.50 is not better for "everyone". Please, each group has different circumstances. I don't want a $2.50 user paywall added to access my group. It will die. And I suspect that many o
"Everyone" paying $2.50 is not better for "everyone". Please, each group has different circumstances. I don't want a $2.50 user paywall added to access my group. It will die. And I suspect that many o
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27861
·
|
|
Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
What I am strongly opposed to is a new member payment NOT tied to a specific group, that would be required to even access any groups that are grandfathered, free Basic and/or already sponsored and pai
What I am strongly opposed to is a new member payment NOT tied to a specific group, that would be required to even access any groups that are grandfathered, free Basic and/or already sponsored and pai
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27837
·
|
|
Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
My Grandfathered FREE Basic Group would no longer be freely accessible, if there is ANY form of a user account fee suddenly being charged by Groups.io every year. My FREE Group would be placed behind
My Grandfathered FREE Basic Group would no longer be freely accessible, if there is ANY form of a user account fee suddenly being charged by Groups.io every year. My FREE Group would be placed behind
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27751
·
|
|
Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
ro-esp, You over-snipped two different concerns that I had. I would prefer not ANY members be forced a charge, but rather enable members an easy way to contribute/donate directly. But, if Groups.io do
ro-esp, You over-snipped two different concerns that I had. I would prefer not ANY members be forced a charge, but rather enable members an easy way to contribute/donate directly. But, if Groups.io do
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27726
·
|
|
Samuel's Paid User Proposal
#suggestion
RE: Once the free member slots are filled up, someone wishing to be a new member of the group would have to pay a yearly fee to Groups.io. Having any mix of free slots versus paid slots will create a
RE: Once the free member slots are filled up, someone wishing to be a new member of the group would have to pay a yearly fee to Groups.io. Having any mix of free slots versus paid slots will create a
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27677
·
|
|
locked
Pricing Changes
#update
I agree with Drew about Members needing to be viewed and treated as Customers, instead of just the "Owners". Many Members even belong to multiple Groups. There needs to be a way for Mark to get money
I agree with Drew about Members needing to be viewed and treated as Customers, instead of just the "Owners". Many Members even belong to multiple Groups. There needs to be a way for Mark to get money
|
By
Scott Chase
· #27408
·
|
|
moderated
Have the Message Search include all Subgroups
Hi, Most of my group members are active in our Main group and do all their searches from there. But, there is more content accumulating in our Subgroups, too. A newer feature was already added to the
Hi, Most of my group members are active in our Main group and do all their searches from there. But, there is more content accumulating in our Subgroups, too. A newer feature was already added to the
|
By
Scott Chase
· #23797
·
|
|
moderated
Moving Topics To Subgroups
Hi Christos, Eventually, post migration, all the members will become unmoderated after four posts, or as I open it up. And the replies come pretty fast after a everyone sees a new Topic. So, I would e
Hi Christos, Eventually, post migration, all the members will become unmoderated after four posts, or as I open it up. And the replies come pretty fast after a everyone sees a new Topic. So, I would e
|
By
Scott Chase
· #23514
·
|
|
moderated
Why not allow Edit w/o resending
Hi, I am a new group owner. I am already a bit frustrated and disappointed that every single time a member edits a message, another e-mail goes out to hundreds of members again, and again, and again.
Hi, I am a new group owner. I am already a bit frustrated and disappointed that every single time a member edits a message, another e-mail goes out to hundreds of members again, and again, and again.
|
By
Scott Chase
· #23504
·
|
|
moderated
Moving Topics To Subgroups
I really need to be able to move Topics to Subgroups, too. Our "main" group is for general discussion. And we use Subgroups to group specific genetic discussions and with only a subset of interested m
I really need to be able to move Topics to Subgroups, too. Our "main" group is for general discussion. And we use Subgroups to group specific genetic discussions and with only a subset of interested m
|
By
Scott Chase
· #23502
·
|
|
moderated
Need different nomenclature of the transfer queue
Hi Mark, Also, not providing any status results from the Stage 1&2 download, and then only providing the current wording for your Stage 3, seemed a bit vague & uncertain to me -- at least until I star
Hi Mark, Also, not providing any status results from the Stage 1&2 download, and then only providing the current wording for your Stage 3, seemed a bit vague & uncertain to me -- at least until I star
|
By
Scott Chase
· #22880
·
|