|
moderated
Edit indicator
#suggestion
Additionally, (I'm new to this group) The Save Without Resending to the Group option that is available to moderators --- Request that this option be made available to ALL members (who have permission
|
Additionally, (I'm new to this group) The Save Without Resending to the Group option that is available to moderators --- Request that this option be made available to ALL members (who have permission
|
By
KWKloeber
· #17829
·
|
|
moderated
#owner email addressing
#suggestion
It’s the 99%, 1% rule. Ken Sent from my phone
|
It’s the 99%, 1% rule. Ken Sent from my phone
|
By
KWKloeber
· #17884
·
|
|
setting to moderate every thread a member starts
#suggestion
(Since we can’t edit our posts.....) Is a member who, FOR WHATEVER reason, doesn’t play nice, worth keeping s/he in the playground? Just pull the plug and be DONE with it.
|
(Since we can’t edit our posts.....) Is a member who, FOR WHATEVER reason, doesn’t play nice, worth keeping s/he in the playground? Just pull the plug and be DONE with it.
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18155
·
|
|
setting to moderate every thread a member starts
#suggestion
I understood you the first time. And again, it's not a matter of not playing nice. It has to do with the particular situation of the group member and their cat.
|
I understood you the first time. And again, it's not a matter of not playing nice. It has to do with the particular situation of the group member and their cat.
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18179
·
|
|
moderated
Whacky wiki ToC
The issues applying a ToC to each wiki page (that warrants one is well documented. Whats the probability of those issues getting “fixed”? Or should we just move on to another wiki platform? Page ToCs
|
The issues applying a ToC to each wiki page (that warrants one is well documented. Whats the probability of those issues getting “fixed”? Or should we just move on to another wiki platform? Page ToCs
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18201
·
|
|
moderated
Change "Rejected message" to "Message rejected" in member activity log
#suggestion
“Message rejected” would be shorthand for (third person) “The message was rejected...” IMNHO an uggggggghhhgh in technical writing. Ambiguous.... WHO did the rejecting? Unless it’s intentionally writt
|
“Message rejected” would be shorthand for (third person) “The message was rejected...” IMNHO an uggggggghhhgh in technical writing. Ambiguous.... WHO did the rejecting? Unless it’s intentionally writt
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18246
·
|
|
moderated
Change "Rejected message" to "Message rejected" in member activity log
#suggestion
Ah yes. Duh. Passive was the operative word, not third person (3rd passive vs 3rd active) the late hour is my only defense ;-) Or — just 1st active. I am the IO system and I rejected your message ,,,,
|
Ah yes. Duh. Passive was the operative word, not third person (3rd passive vs 3rd active) the late hour is my only defense ;-) Or — just 1st active. I am the IO system and I rejected your message ,,,,
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18249
·
|
|
moderated
Change "Rejected message" to "Message rejected" in member activity log
#suggestion
Ahem... “You received” (We’ll just keep hammering to go cleaner/crisper) :-) You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to the GroupManagersForum@groups.io group.
|
Ahem... “You received” (We’ll just keep hammering to go cleaner/crisper) :-) You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to the GroupManagersForum@groups.io group.
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18257
·
|
|
moderated
Change "Rejected message" to "Message rejected" in member activity log
#suggestion
My point, not well communicated, is that it the construction is kept in mind and focused on up front when composing every message (of any type anywhere) the ambiguity and huhs? more often than not aut
|
My point, not well communicated, is that it the construction is kept in mind and focused on up front when composing every message (of any type anywhere) the ambiguity and huhs? more often than not aut
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18272
·
|
|
moderated
Web-only group
#suggestion
Why do people believe that they have a right not to be offended or excluded? Frankly if I started a group and the premise was “we accept email only” or “we accept web only” or “we accept msgs on a ful
|
Why do people believe that they have a right not to be offended or excluded? Frankly if I started a group and the premise was “we accept email only” or “we accept web only” or “we accept msgs on a ful
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18586
·
|
|
locked
Not permitted groups
Those that will do IT (whatever IT is defined as) will still do IT, regardless of warnings, terms of service, whatever. Disallowing IT, is like a magnet, a gauntlet thrown down as a challenge. We shou
|
Those that will do IT (whatever IT is defined as) will still do IT, regardless of warnings, terms of service, whatever. Disallowing IT, is like a magnet, a gauntlet thrown down as a challenge. We shou
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18646
·
|
|
moderated
Language Definition of Spam
If one keeps going down the rabbit hole on topics/actions that one CAN’T do, you’ll end up in China. It’s a never-ending/ever-expansive list one could generate. And then it requires narrowly defining
|
If one keeps going down the rabbit hole on topics/actions that one CAN’T do, you’ll end up in China. It’s a never-ending/ever-expansive list one could generate. And then it requires narrowly defining
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18727
·
|
|
moderated
Language
I’ll fight to the death that proper grammar and structure are important and should be retained no matter. For instance, one does not know when something may become unclear (to someone else.) What’s th
|
I’ll fight to the death that proper grammar and structure are important and should be retained no matter. For instance, one does not know when something may become unclear (to someone else.) What’s th
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18743
·
|
|
moderated
Request for more functional move/split
#suggestion
Suggest adding/modifying for better functionality in moving/splitting messages. Can't find a way to move (merge?) selected messages into their "proper" topic, because it appears to be an "everything n
|
Suggest adding/modifying for better functionality in moving/splitting messages. Can't find a way to move (merge?) selected messages into their "proper" topic, because it appears to be an "everything n
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18792
·
|
|
moderated
Request for more functional move/split
#suggestion
Semantics. Ok. 'slightly, inadvertently, drifted off topic." -k As a moderator/friend oftentimes laments, "When someone asks 'What time is it?," explaining 'How to build a clock' isn't an appropriate
|
Semantics. Ok. 'slightly, inadvertently, drifted off topic." -k As a moderator/friend oftentimes laments, "When someone asks 'What time is it?," explaining 'How to build a clock' isn't an appropriate
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18796
·
|
|
moderated
Request for more functional move/split
#suggestion
On the topic here, I no longer use the split feature, having decided that its pitfalls overcome its advantages. This is because people still respond via email to the old-named email conversation threa
|
On the topic here, I no longer use the split feature, having decided that its pitfalls overcome its advantages. This is because people still respond via email to the old-named email conversation threa
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18797
·
|
|
moderated
Message edit menu missing picture and attach file option
DITTO on that question? Can the photo AND file attachment functionality be added to the Edit function? Not attaching a photo or file is likely one of the key reasons for needing to edit a message. Thx
|
DITTO on that question? Can the photo AND file attachment functionality be added to the Edit function? Not attaching a photo or file is likely one of the key reasons for needing to edit a message. Thx
|
By
KWKloeber
· #18830
·
|
|
moderated
ability to disable "Like" feature
#suggestion
Hear, hear about that option. Or LIKE, LIKE!!
|
Hear, hear about that option. Or LIKE, LIKE!!
|
By
KWKloeber
· #19175
·
|
|
moderated
Don't allow members to delete whole topics @strongsuggestion
Can a member post a "new" topic that is identical to another topic? Or they could just insignificantly change it to "edit" and resend the original message. -ken
|
Can a member post a "new" topic that is identical to another topic? Or they could just insignificantly change it to "edit" and resend the original message. -ken
|
By
KWKloeber
· #19248
·
|
|
moderated
Don't allow members to delete whole topics @strongsuggestion
J My point (between the lines) - is if a group prohibits editing, a member could simply copy, start a new topic, paste, edit, send. To email users it would appear to be an identical [edited] message.
|
J My point (between the lines) - is if a group prohibits editing, a member could simply copy, start a new topic, paste, edit, send. To email users it would appear to be an identical [edited] message.
|
By
KWKloeber
· #19287
·
|
