|
unify moderation response
#suggestion
Like Shal I cannot see the point of this. Senders are not "notified" that a message has been approved anyway; they either see it using the web UI or receive the same email that other members get when
|
Like Shal I cannot see the point of this. Senders are not "notified" that a message has been approved anyway; they either see it using the web UI or receive the same email that other members get when
|
By
Chris Jones
· #28460
·
|
|
unify moderation response
#suggestion
I'm asking for a third link in the message. The text of the link is just a sample. Best, Glenn
|
I'm asking for a third link in the message. The text of the link is just a sample. Best, Glenn
|
By
Glenn Glazer
· #28459
·
|
|
unify moderation response
#suggestion
Glenn, I don't understand what you're asking for. Currently, the only way in which the member is informed of the approval is that they see the approved message appear in the group's Messages, and/or i
|
Glenn, I don't understand what you're asking for. Currently, the only way in which the member is informed of the approval is that they see the approved message appear in the group's Messages, and/or i
|
By
Shal Farley
· #28458
·
|
|
unify moderation response
#suggestion
When I get a Message Approval Needed email, at the bottom I see: To approve this using email, reply to this message. You do not need to attach the original message, just reply and send. Reject this me
|
When I get a Message Approval Needed email, at the bottom I see: To approve this using email, reply to this message. You do not need to attach the original message, just reply and send. Reject this me
|
By
Glenn Glazer
· #28457
·
|
|
Changes to Subscription page layout
#suggestion
These would also be applicable to the Membership page for individual members. Andy
|
These would also be applicable to the Membership page for individual members. Andy
|
By
Andy Wedge
· #28456
·
|
|
Changes to Subscription page layout
#suggestion
Hi Mark, While I've been testing the changes to Email Delivery and Message Selection options, I had some thoughts about the layout of the Subscription page: The length of this page is now greater than
|
Hi Mark, While I've been testing the changes to Email Delivery and Message Selection options, I had some thoughts about the layout of the Subscription page: The length of this page is now greater than
|
By
Andy Wedge
· #28455
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Thanks for the fixes Mark! >>> a new subscription page similar That's neat, that means my remaining grey matter is still working OK more or less, with the occasional misfire :) Speaking of misfires, I
|
Thanks for the fixes Mark! >>> a new subscription page similar That's neat, that means my remaining grey matter is still working OK more or less, with the occasional misfire :) Speaking of misfires, I
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
· #28451
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Thanks for the reminder; I had forgotten that page. It's been changed. Thanks, Mark
|
Thanks for the reminder; I had forgotten that page. It's been changed. Thanks, Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #28450
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Hi Mark, the Default Sub Settings page still has the old layout. Are you planning to update this also? Andy
|
Hi Mark, the Default Sub Settings page still has the old layout. Are you planning to update this also? Andy
|
By
Andy Wedge
· #28449
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Great! I think this solves this problem. Since FO now automatically includes Auto Follow Replies, you could instead just remove the AFR option and add explanatory text to FO. But either way works!
|
Great! I think this solves this problem. Since FO now automatically includes Auto Follow Replies, you could instead just remove the AFR option and add explanatory text to FO. But either way works!
|
By
J_Catlady
· #28448
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
I've now made the following changes to the edit subscription and group member pages: Under Advanced Preferences, Auto Follow Replies has been moved under Following Only. When Following Only is not che
|
I've now made the following changes to the edit subscription and group member pages: Under Advanced Preferences, Auto Follow Replies has been moved under Following Only. When Following Only is not che
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #28447
·
|
|
Ability to "Star" a message or thread
#suggestion
I note that “favoriting” was a feature that Y!Choo introduced (I believe right after the NEO “better idea”) and it was so very useful to keep track of certain oft-used replies to oft-asked questions (
|
I note that “favoriting” was a feature that Y!Choo introduced (I believe right after the NEO “better idea”) and it was so very useful to keep track of certain oft-used replies to oft-asked questions (
|
By
KWKloeber
· #28445
·
|
|
Ability to "Star" a message or thread
#suggestion
Good morning, I have been wondering if we could re-visit the idea of being able to "Star" messages or topics we would each like to be able to find quickly? I know this has been suggested before as bas
|
Good morning, I have been wondering if we could re-visit the idea of being able to "Star" messages or topics we would each like to be able to find quickly? I know this has been suggested before as bas
|
By
Yvette Money
· #28444
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
That works. Someone wanting to follow topics will now get those messages. That also makes sense. It's less necessary than the first change but it eliminates some confusion. What's still missing is tha
|
That works. Someone wanting to follow topics will now get those messages. That also makes sense. It's less necessary than the first change but it eliminates some confusion. What's still missing is tha
|
By
J_Catlady
· #28442
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Hi All, I've been following the discussion. I started to implement a new subscription page similar to what Christos proposed. But I decided, at least for now, to go with a couple smaller changes: When
|
Hi All, I've been following the discussion. I started to implement a new subscription page similar to what Christos proposed. But I decided, at least for now, to go with a couple smaller changes: When
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #28441
·
|
|
#suggestion Multiple and/or blanket RSVP for sub/group
#suggestion
Instead of only individual viewevent?eventid= RSVPs, also allow multiple events to be RSVPd, with a single click of Will Attend or Not Sure, after multi-selecting. Related, but maybe worthy of separat
|
Instead of only individual viewevent?eventid= RSVPs, also allow multiple events to be RSVPd, with a single click of Will Attend or Not Sure, after multi-selecting. Related, but maybe worthy of separat
|
By
Alwin
· #28436
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
:-)
By
J_Catlady
· #28432
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Yes, something is definitely needed, it's not just the bugs, but also overall easier and better user experience as well. LOL, I need an editor for my emails ... but at least there are no typaws.
|
Yes, something is definitely needed, it's not just the bugs, but also overall easier and better user experience as well. LOL, I need an editor for my emails ... but at least there are no typaws.
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
· #28431
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
Emphasis on "needed." Thanks for the clarification.
|
Emphasis on "needed." Thanks for the clarification.
|
By
J_Catlady
· #28430
·
|
|
moderated
Disallow concurrent "special notices" and "following only"
#suggestion
#bug
>>> It (the UI) is really in radical need of a fix and I hope this doesn't get swept under the rug. Oops, I should had bolded what I was referring to with the "No" bit, "No it's not, at least from my
|
>>> It (the UI) is really in radical need of a fix and I hope this doesn't get swept under the rug. Oops, I should had bolded what I was referring to with the "No" bit, "No it's not, at least from my
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
· #28429
·
|
