Note: groups.io will be down for maintenance this evening, starting at 11pm Pacific Time (6am Tuesday 8/3/2020 UTC), for up to two hours.
|
moderated
Public archives
#suggestion
It's a given that it has not changed from private to public. That's a one-way street and goes only in the other direction. I concur with Mark about your excellent suggestions, in particular the one ab
|
It's a given that it has not changed from private to public. That's a one-way street and goes only in the other direction. I concur with Mark about your excellent suggestions, in particular the one ab
|
By
J_Catlady
· #25128
·
|
|
moderated
Public archives
#suggestion
I'm also happy this group has public archives, as I can give it a quick check for new messages at times when I don't want to log on. If it helps, the public can't see much about you from the archives
|
I'm also happy this group has public archives, as I can give it a quick check for new messages at times when I don't want to log on. If it helps, the public can't see much about you from the archives
|
By
JohnF
· #25126
·
|
|
moderated
Public archives
#suggestion
Hi Helen, It's always had a public archive, and that won't change. I have very much appreciated your feedback and suggestions over the years and hope you'll stay. Mark
|
Hi Helen, It's always had a public archive, and that won't change. I have very much appreciated your feedback and suggestions over the years and hope you'll stay. Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
· #25125
·
|
|
moderated
Public archives
#suggestion
Nope, it's been that way since day 1. It's so folks can find answers to questions without needing to join a group, same as Group_Help and GMF. Duane
|
Nope, it's been that way since day 1. It's so folks can find answers to questions without needing to join a group, same as Group_Help and GMF. Duane
|
By
Duane
· #25124
·
|
|
moderated
Public archives
#suggestion
Only just noticed this group has public archives. Not sure if this changed, because I never knowingly post in groups with public archives. In fact, I don't usually even join them. I see no reason why
|
Only just noticed this group has public archives. Not sure if this changed, because I never knowingly post in groups with public archives. In fact, I don't usually even join them. I see no reason why
|
By
Tanya's Feline CKD
· #25123
·
|
|
moderated
Add a built-in PDF and Doc previewer for the Files section?
#suggestion
+1. Of course 'most' ordinary users don't understand the technical aspect of the way the web (WWW) works anyway, so how things are 'magically' and invisibly downloaded compared to the act of physicall
|
+1. Of course 'most' ordinary users don't understand the technical aspect of the way the web (WWW) works anyway, so how things are 'magically' and invisibly downloaded compared to the act of physicall
|
By
dave w
· #25120
·
|
|
moderated
Add a built-in PDF and Doc previewer for the Files section?
#suggestion
That's a common misconception. In order to be viewed on your screen, the file is downloaded, at least part of it. All modern browsers that I'm aware of have a way to view PDF files. It's much more com
|
That's a common misconception. In order to be viewed on your screen, the file is downloaded, at least part of it. All modern browsers that I'm aware of have a way to view PDF files. It's much more com
|
By
Duane
· #25116
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
As they are. The suggestion in this thread has nothing to do with group messages. It is about messages going only to the owner/moderators of a group. Group members don't even receive such messages, so
|
As they are. The suggestion in this thread has nothing to do with group messages. It is about messages going only to the owner/moderators of a group. Group members don't even receive such messages, so
|
By
J_Catlady
· #25109
·
|
|
moderated
Add a built-in PDF and Doc previewer for the Files section?
#suggestion
One of my groups is starting to use the Files section for a 'library' of catalogs. Most are uploaded as either PDF files and occasionally Word Doc files. It would be very useful to be able to preview
|
One of my groups is starting to use the Files section for a 'library' of catalogs. Most are uploaded as either PDF files and occasionally Word Doc files. It would be very useful to be able to preview
|
By
Bart Fried
· #25108
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Of course Subjects should be required. Especially in a group or forum ... otherwise how does one know if they are opening a Topcical or OFF TOPIC item? There are enough other time-sucks in the world.
|
Of course Subjects should be required. Especially in a group or forum ... otherwise how does one know if they are opening a Topcical or OFF TOPIC item? There are enough other time-sucks in the world.
|
By
Bart Fried
· #25107
·
|
|
moderated
Standardise links at bottom of Daily Summary and Full Digest Emails
#suggestion
My Suggestion is to separate the "View/Online" link into "View Thread" and "Reply online". I always have to generate an empty message whenever I wawnn to review the thread. Regards Georg Klein
|
My Suggestion is to separate the "View/Online" link into "View Thread" and "Reply online". I always have to generate an empty message whenever I wawnn to review the thread. Regards Georg Klein
|
By
Georg Klein
· #25106
·
|
|
moderated
API Authorization: Bearer instead of Basic
#suggestion
Been writing some babysitting queries that interact with the API to get members and database rows. While the API docs clearly say HTTP Basic Auth when using the token style of authentication, it never
|
Been writing some babysitting queries that interact with the API to get members and database rows. While the API docs clearly say HTTP Basic Auth when using the token style of authentication, it never
|
By
jay@...
· #25105
·
|
|
moderated
Standardise links at bottom of Daily Summary and Full Digest Emails
#suggestion
Hi, I think it would be helpful to have the Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links shown at the bottom of the Daily Summary email also shown at the bottom of a Full Digest to provide a consi
|
Hi, I think it would be helpful to have the Home, Subscription, Messages and New Topic links shown at the bottom of the Daily Summary email also shown at the bottom of a Full Digest to provide a consi
|
By
Andy Wedge
· #25103
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Yes! Was definitely riffing on him. You got it! 😻
|
Yes! Was definitely riffing on him. You got it! 😻
|
By
J_Catlady
· #25101
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Are you riffing T.S. Eliot's The Naming of Cats? If so, I approve. Best, Glenn
|
Are you riffing T.S. Eliot's The Naming of Cats? If so, I approve. Best, Glenn
|
By
Glenn Glazer
· #25100
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Divining intent is a perilous matter When multiple plausible meanings exist. Some people may just mean to clean up their chatter But just by pure chance they make others quite pissed.
|
Divining intent is a perilous matter When multiple plausible meanings exist. Some people may just mean to clean up their chatter But just by pure chance they make others quite pissed.
|
By
J_Catlady
· #25099
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
I think divining intent from semantics is a perilous business, in particular when there are multiple plausible intents. Some people may intend to start a new thread by changing the subject line. Some
|
I think divining intent from semantics is a perilous business, in particular when there are multiple plausible intents. Some people may intend to start a new thread by changing the subject line. Some
|
By
Glenn Glazer
· #25098
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Folks, If you change the subject line you probably intend to start a new thread. The problem is when you mail client changes the subject. In the past, but perhaps not on ”groups.io” I have seen mails
|
Folks, If you change the subject line you probably intend to start a new thread. The problem is when you mail client changes the subject. In the past, but perhaps not on ”groups.io” I have seen mails
|
By
Dave Wade
· #25097
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
Malcolm Austen: Indeed. I thought the question was asked as to how messages can be threaded correctly if they have no subject line. I attempted to answer that in such a case they can be threaded corre
|
Malcolm Austen: Indeed. I thought the question was asked as to how messages can be threaded correctly if they have no subject line. I attempted to answer that in such a case they can be threaded corre
|
By
Malcolm Austen
· #25096
·
|
|
moderated
Rejecting messages without a subject line
#suggestion
This has been hashed and rehashed an rerehashed in the past and the decision was made to thread topics based on subject line as well, because sometimes they were not threading correctly otherwise. I t
|
This has been hashed and rehashed an rerehashed in the past and the decision was made to thread topics based on subject line as well, because sometimes they were not threading correctly otherwise. I t
|
By
J_Catlady
· #25095
·
|
