|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Duane, Or in other words, according to what you wrote, the probe bounces are possibly not *supposed* to be tracked in the Activity Log; but the experience now (the bug I'm bringing up) is they are cur
|
Duane, Or in other words, according to what you wrote, the probe bounces are possibly not *supposed* to be tracked in the Activity Log; but the experience now (the bug I'm bringing up) is they are cur
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24083
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Thanks for the sanity check. I remember someone having requested that they be tracked, and tracking bouncing of the probes could indeed be very useful (as I just wrote in the separate thread about thi
|
Thanks for the sanity check. I remember someone having requested that they be tracked, and tracking bouncing of the probes could indeed be very useful (as I just wrote in the separate thread about thi
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24081
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Based on my limited investigation, you're partially correct. The bounces of the probes wasn't logged in the Activity Log, but was logged in the member's Email Delivery History as of July/August last y
|
Based on my limited investigation, you're partially correct. The bounces of the probes wasn't logged in the Activity Log, but was logged in the member's Email Delivery History as of July/August last y
|
By
Duane
· #24080
·
|
|
moderated
Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Yes, and that's one more reason why you don't need or want further "is bouncing" entries in the group activity log. However, a group activity log entry to the effect that the member is actually bounci
|
Yes, and that's one more reason why you don't need or want further "is bouncing" entries in the group activity log. However, a group activity log entry to the effect that the member is actually bounci
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24079
·
|
|
moderated
Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Bounce Probes show up in the individual member's Email Delivery History. Chris
|
Bounce Probes show up in the individual member's Email Delivery History. Chris
|
By
Chris Jones
· #24078
·
|
|
moderated
Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Mark, Sorry for the dribble of thoughts. Things keep occurring to me, but I will stop after this. I think as moderators we do want to know when a bounce probe itself has bounced, so that we can not se
|
Mark, Sorry for the dribble of thoughts. Things keep occurring to me, but I will stop after this. I think as moderators we do want to know when a bounce probe itself has bounced, so that we can not se
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24077
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
John et al, I'd already started a separate topic for the multiple "is bouncing" entries bug. I just posted an update in it, but I'll repeat quickly here and then move over there from now on: After an
|
John et al, I'd already started a separate topic for the multiple "is bouncing" entries bug. I just posted an update in it, but I'll repeat quickly here and then move over there from now on: After an
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24076
·
|
|
moderated
Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
Mark, The more I think about it, the more I wonder whether the problem lies in the part of the code that handles bounces of bounce probes, rather than the part that handles bounces of group messages.
|
Mark, The more I think about it, the more I wonder whether the problem lies in the part of the code that handles bounces of bounce probes, rather than the part that handles bounces of group messages.
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24073
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Exactly. It's been very useful in finding these cases. And yes, as you say, the issue is the contiguous list of bounces, but not recorded as bounces: recorded (erroneously) as bounce-status changes.
|
Exactly. It's been very useful in finding these cases. And yes, as you say, the issue is the contiguous list of bounces, but not recorded as bounces: recorded (erroneously) as bounce-status changes.
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24072
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
You also certainly do not want a log entry for every message a member bounces. That would be an unholy mess. The “is bouncing” should really only be logged when the account’s status changes to Bouncin
|
You also certainly do not want a log entry for every message a member bounces. That would be an unholy mess. The “is bouncing” should really only be logged when the account’s status changes to Bouncin
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24071
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
ps Rhe reason I say there has been no status change is that there are no intervening entires “x is no longer bouncing.” Granted thst in itself could be a logging bug (I.e., the account did unbound but
|
ps Rhe reason I say there has been no status change is that there are no intervening entires “x is no longer bouncing.” Granted thst in itself could be a logging bug (I.e., the account did unbound but
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24070
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
John, I agree with you on the general principle of the log entry. But I think the problem is with the language of the entry. “X is bouncing” implies a change in status when there has been no change. S
|
John, I agree with you on the general principle of the log entry. But I think the problem is with the language of the entry. “X is bouncing” implies a change in status when there has been no change. S
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24069
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Unless I am much mistaken (always possible!) the anomaly is that while the individual member's Email Delivery History appears to be correct the group - wide Activity log can show a contiguous list of
|
Unless I am much mistaken (always possible!) the anomaly is that while the individual member's Email Delivery History appears to be correct the group - wide Activity log can show a contiguous list of
|
By
Chris Jones
· #24068
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
It is great that this has been set for a hard bounce. I hate going through the group one by one to inspect the mail history. I have to be honest, I'm still not clear on the anomaly you are referring t
|
It is great that this has been set for a hard bounce. I hate going through the group one by one to inspect the mail history. I have to be honest, I'm still not clear on the anomaly you are referring t
|
By
John Pearce
· #24067
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Because the conditions back then for setting a member to "bouncing" were not satisfied. You need either a hard bounce, or at least one soft bounce within every consecutive four consecutive days after
|
Because the conditions back then for setting a member to "bouncing" were not satisfied. You need either a hard bounce, or at least one soft bounce within every consecutive four consecutive days after
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24065
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
I would just like to squeeze in some more data to this topic to show it is not just related to users with special-notice delivery, as well as other observations. For me, the bounce code seems to be wo
|
I would just like to squeeze in some more data to this topic to show it is not just related to users with special-notice delivery, as well as other observations. For me, the bounce code seems to be wo
|
By
JediPirx
· #24064
·
|
|
moderated
group-activity "is bouncing" vs. "bounced" log entries don't match search criterion "bounced"
#bug
This is a more accurate rewrite, this time as a bug, of a #suggestion I just wrote about bouncing/bounced log entry mismatches. Here are the actual problems. (I will either delete the previous suggest
|
This is a more accurate rewrite, this time as a bug, of a #suggestion I just wrote about bouncing/bounced log entry mismatches. Here are the actual problems. (I will either delete the previous suggest
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24062
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Exactly right. The bug (of multiple "is bouncing" log entries) pre-existed, but I only see it manifested now because of the fact that this special-notice member was finally noted as bouncing because o
|
Exactly right. The bug (of multiple "is bouncing" log entries) pre-existed, but I only see it manifested now because of the fact that this special-notice member was finally noted as bouncing because o
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24061
·
|
|
moderated
A 554 Bounce code not recognized as bouncing on first occurrence
#bug
#fixed
Off - line activities completed (for now!) I have had a more detailed look and now think I have seen the anomalous Activity log entries mentioned; they only seem to arise for a very small number of bo
|
Off - line activities completed (for now!) I have had a more detailed look and now think I have seen the anomalous Activity log entries mentioned; they only seem to arise for a very small number of bo
|
By
Chris Jones
· #24060
·
|
|
moderated
Bounce handler adds "is bouncing" log entry for bounce from another group, when member already blue B in the group
#bug
In other words, the subject of this bug should be changed to "Bounce handler adds 'is bouncing' log entry when member already blue B in the group"
|
In other words, the subject of this bug should be changed to "Bounce handler adds 'is bouncing' log entry when member already blue B in the group"
|
By
J_Catlady
· #24059
·
|
