Using "Reply to group" results in the message created still being correctly threaded on the web forum, which implies to me that it would also keep it threaded correctly in an e-mail reader. It is, in

What requires revisiting is whether it should. I don't need any further convincing that it does. I have never been persuaded by the argument, "because we've always done it that way," and particularly

#suggestion

Well, based on what has been stated here, which I have no reason to doubt, the idea that an end-user's choice of no-email should block administrative notices is in desperate need of revisiting. I can

#suggestion

OK, but I still don't understand. (And that could be my not getting something). My understanding is that it is not possible for members of a group to block special notices by e-mail under any circumst

#suggestion

Before I ask this, I wish to emphasize it is not intended to ignite a firestorm, but because I'm genuinely curious: 1. Why would one wish to disable the no e-mail option? 2. What does it gain a group

#suggestion

As a non-owner, I am not sure exactly how you might do it, but it might be a very good idea to send this information directly to anyone who's trying to unsubscribe secondary to "too many e-mails" and

#suggestion

I also think it's a crying shame that a very great many Groups.io members have no idea how exquisite the level of control over e-mail volume can be if one knows how to do it. This has been an issue on

#suggestion

And therein could lie the problem. I have experience all sorts of oddities over a long period of time with the file managers of a number of image viewers. I only use the copy/paste technique as you de

Might you share what "the magic perms" are? I definitely don't know though I'm not a group owner, but I feel certain that there are others who may not who are themselves group owners.

J, What Mark may or may not choose to implement shouldn't change what one requests. I'm still requesting whether I get it or not. Also, and does history here bear this out, whether or not anyone agree

Seconded! It only makes sense to allow moderators/owners to post to locked topics, too.

Mark, This is not meant to be as argumentative as it may sound, but the ability to use the * wildcard would not be considered regex capability by anyone familiar with regular expressions. Wildcarding

#suggestion

If regular expressions are actually supported, it would be really helpful to know what flavor/syntax (see: https://regex101.com/) is required. I put this here since Mark may see it and be able to answ

#suggestion

. . . and, if it isn't, shouldn't it be? I am finding more and more often that I would love to be able to narrow my searches on a lot more than keywords/key phrases, and to do so easily. I cannot find

#suggestion

Thanks for the explanation. Things happen.

#cal-invite #downtime

I concur with this.

#suggestion

It's not present on an Android phablet. But I don't expect mobile platforms to directly mirror the desktop environment any more than I expect the online interface to directly mirror the e-mail interfa

#suggestion

Just as a data point, the "antique" software I mentioned earlier does exactly this. The button is "Preview/Post Message," after pressing this the preview pops up, then you confirm with a "Post" button

#suggestion

[Preview Function] (we're crossing posts here, but to keep flow in this case one has to) It's the rule, not the exception. And as we've already found, there is one here, it's just not quite as obvious

#suggestion

Because many of us want to actually see how a message will appear, in its entirety, to all its recipients. It's not about proofreading (though that's certainly a part of it) but about assessing layout

#suggestion