Ah-ha. That was something I completely missed. My eye was trained on the right where the "Private" button is located. (Speaking of which, why is the "Private" button located on the right next to the "

#suggestion

Except when it says "Reply to Author" (which is what shows up in my group, whose "Reply To" setting set to "Sender"). I think the web-based and email-based group/sender workflows could stand an overal

#suggestion

Look to the left. It will say Reply to Group in green or Reply to Sender in blue, depending on where it will go. Duane

#suggestion

What I meant was that all you have to do to see it is to bcc yourself. That's what I always do, and I do that SOLELY for the purpose of verifying it went to the right place. It's hidden "by design" bu

#suggestion

Good points. FYI, hiding the recipient's email address might be by design. I haven't kept up with this, but don't groups obscure the sender's address from view? I thought they did. If they do, then th

#suggestion

For various reasons, I don't use the web UI, but what you describe is the way that Thunderbird works: It is even smart enough to look for a List-Post header in the email and if it finds it, changes th

#suggestion

The worst problem for me w private replies is that until you actually click “send,” you have no way of verifying the email address to know that it’s going to the right person. I usually resort to scro

#suggestion

Makes sense. I think whatever it is, it should mirror the email footer, which right now says "Reply To Group" and "Reply To Sender." \ Pete

#suggestion

Yes - and I wonder if "Sender only" would be better as well, in both the online and email versions. Andy

#suggestion

I agree and I've had a few members who were thoroughly confused by this. I think a clearer construction would be two radio buttons, one for "Group" and one for "Sender" (since the word "Sender" is use

#suggestion

I rarely ever send Private replies. But when I do, I have a problem: It's hard for me to tell when the message will be Private, and when it won't. In both cases, there is a "Private" button near the l

#suggestion

This is a reply to an old thread, because the same thing happened again. Not fixed yet. What I did: I wrote a reply in a group using the web interface, then clicked the green "Reply to Group" button t

#bug

I just recently noticed that #cal-reminders contain an invite.ics file as an attachment. In fact, not just one, but two. I thought only #cal-invites were supposed to have these. Although they're small

#suggestion

Changes to the site this week: April 28, 2022: BUGFIX: April 27, 2022: If Force HTML Emails and Plain Text Only group settings are both checked, we should take the plain text part of a message and use

#changelog

(First, belated reply to Andy in previous message: yes, I did realize that eventually. Thanks.) There is another weirdness. I may be completely misremembering, but did Send Message (from the member pa

#bug

Hi Mark, Thanks and it works great, and yes the HTML footers are nicer. The text-only footers are not bad either, maybe just a bit spartan. :) Cheers, Christos

#bug #suggestion

Hello, I've fixed this. The "Plain Text Only" setting extracts the plain text part of a message (almost all emails have both plain text and HTML parts) and creates a new email with just the plain text

#bug #suggestion

Whoops. Fixed. Thanks, Mark

#bug

An update on this. I was told that allowing both was intentional because folks wanted to have Plain Text groups but also wanted to include the "Reply To Sender" link in the footer which is there on th

#bug #suggestion

Janet, I believe that Mark was not talking about the default action, which remains to send these messages from the person, not the +owner. He was talking about exactly what text is displayed in the "F

#bug