Date   

Re: #bug Activity Log Error #bug

 

Oh, forgive me, you said "sorting," and you're referring to the listing order, not the list itself. I'll check it again.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


Re: #bug Activity Log Error #bug

 

My activity-log search dropdown is working fine.
What do you mean by "when I select +owner from the drop down menu"? Which dropdown are you seeing that in? I don't see any such search criterion.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


Re: #bug Activity Log Error #bug

debbie
 

Seems like, from what I could tell, is that you need to have something in the search box for the actions drop down menu to take effect. Maybe it's not a bug, but something that could be formatted to work differently.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:29 PM Mick Anderson <mfanders@...> wrote:
When viewing the activity log I select various sorting options from the drop down menu but the listing does not change.
It shows all activity when first opened but when I select +owner from the drop down menu it still shows all activity.

Mick


#bug Activity Log Error #bug

Mick Anderson
 

When viewing the activity log I select various sorting options from the drop down menu but the listing does not change.
It shows all activity when first opened but when I select +owner from the drop down menu it still shows all activity.

Mick


Re: #suggestion RSVP Adult Child separate #suggestion

Andy Wedge
 

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:31 PM, Bob Bellizzi wrote:
While I understand the suggestion, it could lead to even more requests for further differentiation, viz:  the age line for "kids", younger than 16 or through 16, the gender claimed or other personal selective identity. This could even vary depending on the geography, the family or any one of several factors.
I'm with Bob on this. There could be so many variations that different groups want specific allowances for. 

Anthony Angelo wrote: "The current count is nice as it gives me the number of families attending,"
The count is for the number of attendees/individuals rather than families.

In my recent testing, I did not look at options for bringing guests. I've just tried this though and see that it keeps count towards the limit of individuals attending (rather than families).  Combing the number of guests with the option to request additional information by the organiser (e.g. how many of your guests are children?) would allow flexibility without overly complicating the system.

Andy


Re: Message separator to improve orientation using a screen-reader #suggestion #done

 

The HR tag is not working for me when I am viewing a thread. Could this be visible? It would help screen magnifier users too if it were visible to everyone. But when I go into a thread, the HR tag is not showing up between messages in the thread, running NVDA and FireFox.


Changing a non-mod's posting status logged as "changed moderator permissions" #bug

 

Summary: changing a non-moderator member's posting status resulted in an extra group activity log entry that his "moderator privileges" were changed.

Details: I changed a non-moderator member's posting status to "overrride - moderated" in a non-moderated group. Two activity log entries were created, one of them correct ("changed xyz's posting status") but the other incorrect ("changed xyz's moderator privileges"). Also, neither action was recorded in the member's activity log.

--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


Re: Conflicting info in Admin>Billing/Upgrade #bug #done

 

On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 2:37 PM Bruce Bowman <bruce.bowman@...> wrote:
Mark -- The Basic plan features, as shown on this page, erroneously suggest that subgroups are available to free groups.

This is true even for those groups that were started after January 15.

Thanks for the bug report. It should be fixed now.

Mark 


Re: text Message Footer in html #bug #fixed

 

Hello,

This should be fixed now.

Cheers,
Mark


Re: Message separator to improve orientation using a screen-reader #suggestion #done

 

Hello,

I've added an invisible <hr> tag between messages in the Topic view. Please let me know if this works for you.

Thanks,
Mark


Folder Notification - Add full path #suggestion #done

Beth Weld
 

My group has lots of documents spanning years. I try to manage that in the Files section by creating folders that contain folders that contain folders.

The file notification shows the full path of where the file is uploaded, but the new folder added notification doesn't.  It would be very helpful if all folder notifications contained the full path so that we can easily find them.
Thanks
Beth


Re: #suggestion Profile Privacy #suggestion

Duane
 

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:51 AM, Peter Rawbone wrote:
How about making ‘Other members of your group’ the default setting in Profile Privacy?
I think it should stay the way it is.  I don't need another opt-out to deal with.  Having to opt-in, as now, seems much more apt to make sure people know that they're allowing others to see their information, not just moderators.

Duane


#suggestion Profile Privacy #suggestion

Peter Rawbone
 

How about making ‘Other members of your group’ the default setting in Profile Privacy?

This would help the vast majority to be able to contact a fellow member and assist in keeping the Directory up to speed.

Regards
--
Peter


Re: Message separator to improve orientation using a screen-reader #suggestion #done

 

I second this. I'd personally opt for the


HTML tag, myself.

If the messages are going to have headings between them, I feel it would take too long to navigate, navigating by heading. Unless each heading is a heading level 2, and the body is not part of that heading.

The subject could be heading 2. I still like the


HTML tag more though.

Write to support@groups.io as well. I suggested this change a while back, but not the


HTML tag.


Message separator to improve orientation using a screen-reader #suggestion #done

Jan Hegr (OK1TE)
 

Hello,
although the service is pretty accessible for the blind, thank you, I'd really appreciate some separator between messages when I view a post thread to be able to quickly skip from a message to  another using a screen-reader.

This could be achieved either by <hr> HTML tag or treat the start of the message as a heading.
I believe both approaches can be styled not to break current visual design, but it would help a lot the blind users to navigate the post threads.

Thank you very much,
Jan


Re: #suggestion RSVP Adult Child separate #suggestion

Bob Bellizzi
 

While I understand the suggestion, it could lead to even more requests for further differentiation, viz:  the age line for "kids", younger than 16 or through 16, the gender claimed or other personal selective identity. This could even vary depending on the geography, the family or any one of several factors.
And, what about "almost adults".  In many families there is a period where that classification is used at mixed parties of gatherings wheree they might be allowed a wine fizz, under supervision.  (Italian Immigrant families often allow middle teend a little wine with a lot of soda pop during family get togethers
It seems to me that these classifications should be handled outside the RSVP via email or message to the responsible person.

--

Bob Bellizzi


Re: #suggestion RSVP Adult Child separate #suggestion

 

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 08:30 AM, Mahendra Bakshi wrote:
Why not ask members to specify two numbers:
1.  Number of kids attending
2.  Number of other family member attending.
That's getting pretty (overly) specific while still leaving out other possible categories (friends etc.). I don't favor any of this but would not object strongly to the original suggestion (adults vs kids) since it seems to be helpful to some people.
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


Re: #suggestion RSVP Adult Child separate #suggestion

Mahendra Bakshi
 

Why not ask members to specify two numbers:
1.  Number of kids attending
2.  Number of other family member attending.

Mahendra Bakshi.


Re: text Message Footer in html #bug #fixed

Andrew Partan
 

On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:27:10PM -0400, Andrew Partan wrote:
If I add a Message Footer like this:

line 1 - https://my.web.site
line 2 - https://your.web.site

It show up properly html encoded in the html copy of every message.
But it also shows up html encoded in the text copy of every message.

It used to show up just fine but this broke a bit ago. Unfortunately
I don't remember when.
I went thru some old messages I have. Turns out its been broken
since last December if not longer.

But if the message only contains a text/plain part, then the
customized Message Footer is correctly formatted with no html.

However if the message contains both text/plain and text/html parts,
then the customized Message Footer is formatted with html in the
exact same way in both the text/plain and text/html parts.

Andrew Partan


Photo Auditing: Misleading "updated photo" owner/mod notification #bug

Christos G. Psarras
 

When a member clicks on "Edit" a photo of his, or a mod does the same on any photo, if the "Update" button gets clicked on, the mods get an audit "[groupname] Photo xxx.xxx updated" notification email:
 
Notification subject: 
[<group_name>] Photo <file_name> updated
Notification body text:
The following photos have been updated in the <album_name> album of the <group_name>@groups.io group.
   <file_name>
By: <group_member>
 
In addition, an entry is posted in the Activity log:
<group_member> edited photo <file_name> via web
 
The issue is that the notification (& log entry) is generated & sent even if nothing was changed (i.e. one just clicked on "Update" without changing anything), or if the image itself wasn't changed but something ancillary was, i.e. if the image was selected as the "Cover Photo" and that was all that changed; the auditing code behind the "Update" button doesn't really check if anything was indeed changed, it just assumes something was changed because the Update button was pressed.  While it's obviously good to know if someone is messing around with the Photos, the notification can be misleading because it implies the image itself was modified, which can lead a mod into a wild chase to try and find what someone did, especially if the notification was about specific group photos that shouldn't be messed with.
 
Cheers,
Christos