Date   

moderated Re: Times on Messages

Allen Buchinski
 

Useful, but inefficient if you’re looking at several messages. It’s a hack, but I have a bookmark that displays the date and time for all messages on screen:

javascript:$(‘span[title]').each(function(){this.innerHTML = this.title;});

Allen 

On Jun 4, 2018, at 8:05 AM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:

Hover over the date and you'll see the time.
--
J
 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu



moderated Re: Selecting revisions in the Revision list

 

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote:

I propose that, when there are two checkmarks already present, clicking on a checkbox between the current checkmarks, or below the lower one, automatically move the bottom checkmark to the clicked box.

It should work that way now.

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Times on Messages

 

Hover over the date and you'll see the time.
--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Times on Messages

Sharon Villines
 

I just noticed that the time on messages doesn’t stay. It appears on the day the message is sent but then only the day stays.

The time is necessary to reconstruct events. The order of messages is there but need to know (sometimes) if the response came in one hour or 12 hours.

I just spent a couple of hours reconstructing a timeline for 3 days of messages on 2 lists and real time events. I had to use my copies of the messages because those had the times recorded.

Please fix — or tell me if this is caused by my settings.

Sharon
----
Sharon Villines
TakomaDC@Groups.io


moderated remove "The groups.io team" signature from rejected message #suggestion

 

The current "rejected message" format is as below:

Hello,

A message you sent to the group xyz was not approved by the moderators for the following reason:

[reason stated by the rejecting moderator]

The message is attached.


The Groups.io Team

I see these messages because I always bcc myself on rejected messages, and every time, it strikes me as "off" that the signature on the rejection is "The Groups.io Team." I think this looks to the user as if groups.io, rather than the specific group, is responsible for rejecting the message. I think the idea was that the groups.io signature goes along with the statement at the top ("a message you sent to the group xyz") to create a frame by groups.io about the group, rather than the message coming from the specific group. However, I don't think they match, since "the moderators" refers back to the specific group, not groups.io.

I would prefer that the sig just be dropped. I don't know what a suitable replacement might be, but I don't think any sig is necessary in this notification.
--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Tom Vail
 

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 06:01 pm, J_Catlady wrote:
Someone joins a second group and suddenly the landing page changes. Then they drop out of a group, leaving them back to one, and it changes back again. This has got to leave people scratching their metaphorical heads. :) 
So you are saying that if someone does not have to choose their group because the system knows they only belong to one and it takes them right to it, and then they join another group they would not think something would change?  If that creates metaphorical head scratching then I would submit they would never even consider going to the Groups.io main page.

Peace,
Tom


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

 

The main objection I would have, even besides the problem of getting to the groups.io main page, is the inconsistency. Someone joins a second group and suddenly the landing page changes. Then they drop out of a group, leaving them back to one, and it changes back again. This has got to leave people scratching their metaphorical heads. :) 

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:57 PM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 05:54 pm, Tom Vail wrote:
Is it not true that all they have to do is click on the "Home" tab to go to the main page
No but they can click on "groups.io" at the top. (Clicking on "Home" just takes them to the group home page.) So yes, they can get to the main groups.io page but they have to explicitly know to click on that. 
 
--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu



--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

 

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 05:54 pm, Tom Vail wrote:
Is it not true that all they have to do is click on the "Home" tab to go to the main page
No but they can click on "groups.io" at the top. (Clicking on "Home" just takes them to the group home page.) So yes, they can get to the main groups.io page but they have to explicitly know to click on that. 
 
--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Tom Vail
 

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 05:42 pm, J_Catlady wrote:
they lose the groups.io main page functionality
Is it not true that all they have to do is click on the "Home" tab to go to the main page no matter where on the site they are?  Or is there a way to eliminate/hide the left side bar of tabs?

Peace,
Tom


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

 

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 05:28 pm, Tom Vail wrote:
I guess I did not make my suggestion clear.  
You made it completely clear. The problem is that they lose the groups.io main page functionality that way, unless they know how to specifically go one level up to it.
 
--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Duane
 

They would need some way to get to the overview page in case they needed to use the functions of the side menu items.  What happens if they're already logged in, which page does the site take them to?  They can create a bookmark to the group and skip steps 1, 2, and 3.  If their login expires (or they log out), they will get a login page via the bookmark, but it will take them to the group after they sign in again.

Duane


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Tom Vail
 

Okay, I guess I did not make my suggestion clear.  So here is a step-by-step of what I was trying to suggest:

  1. Joe Member goes to the Group.IO site and clicks on "Log in"
  2. A screen comes up for him to enter his email and P/W
  3. The next screen is a list of all the groups he is a member of
  4. He clicks on his group and is taken to that group

What I'm suggesting is if the list in step 3 only has one group in it, why not just eliminate the step send him directly to the group?  (IE: If group-list >1, go to choose-group, else if group-list =1 go to group)

If they logged on to join another group, the "find or create a group" option is still at the top of the page.

This is not a suggestion made on the results of a massive number of complaints.  It is based on a presentation I did this morning on our group when I saw a way to streamline the sign on process.

Peace,
Tom


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

 

Right.


On Jun 3, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote:

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 02:48 pm, Tom Vail wrote:
All those features are tabs on the left
The ones on the overview page are different than the ones on the group page though.

Duane

--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Bob Bellizzi
 

I think that if one attempts to go directly  to a group's message/topic page and is not already logged in that
they will be taken to that page if they use the "email me a link to log in" function.
We have almost 3500 members between ages of 20 and 93, if I remember and since we moved to groups.io we have heard few issues with accessing the message/topic page
--

Bob Bellizzi

Founder, Fuchs Friends ®
Founder & Executive Director, The Corneal Dystrophy Foundation


moderated Selecting revisions in the Revision list

 

Mark,

In revision lists, for both Wiki pages and messages, the checkboxes on the left are used to select exactly two as endpoints for the Compare Revisions button.

The trouble is that the top and bottom revision are selected by default, and one cannot move a checkmark by simply clicking in an available checkbox - one must first uncheck the top or bottom (or both) before selecting a new endpoint.

This gets very tiresome for pages with many revisions, when the bottommost revision is out of sight below the current window size. Then one must scroll down, unselect it, then scroll back up to select the desired endpoint.

I propose that, when there are two checkmarks already present, clicking on a checkbox between the current checkmarks, or below the lower one, automatically move the bottom checkmark to the clicked box. Optionally, clicking on a checkbox above the current top checkmark could move the top checkmark to the clicked box.

This would be much more facile for the common case of checking recent revisions. I find that I almost never want to compare old revisions; most of the time it is the most recent revision against a somewhat less recent one.

Shal


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Duane
 

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 02:48 pm, Tom Vail wrote:
All those features are tabs on the left
The ones on the overview page are different than the ones on the group page though.

Duane


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

 

I don’t see them.


On Jun 3, 2018, at 2:48 PM, Tom Vail <tom@...> wrote:

All those features are tabs on the left, which would not go away, and the "find or create a group" is in the upper header also not affected by the fact they do not have to click their group name in between signing in and getting to their group.  Maybe I missed your point?

Peace,
Tom

--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Tom Vail
 

All those features are tabs on the left, which would not go away, and the "find or create a group" is in the upper header also not affected by the fact they do not have to click their group name in between signing in and getting to their group.  Maybe I missed your point?

Peace,
Tom


moderated Re: #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

 

I like the idea, but it would cause the user not to see the functions/features available on the main page, possibly forever (since, as you say, they may non-tech savvy and would never know to go one level up): topics, hashtags, calendar, "find or create a group."
--
J

 

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.

I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu


moderated #suggestion - Take member directly to group if they only belong to one #suggestion

Tom Vail
 

As it is, when a member signs in they must then click on the group they want to go to.  If they only belong to one group, why not take them directly to that group?

For the non-tech savvy folks, who likely only belong to one group (which is the case in our group) it would be a cleaner interface for the user.  And isn't that a lot of what we are trying to achieve?

Yes, I know it is just one click.  But if you are reading this you may not be able to relate because you don't fall into the "non-tech savvy" group.

Peace,
Tom

12521 - 12540 of 29648