Date   

Re: Integration message moderation change

Bob Bellizzi
 

A bit late to this conversation but while I like the idea of integration moderation variation for the moderators (sorry, I like to pun)
this change disabled our Facebook page integration which was working fine till the change went into effect.
I have the moderate box checked and nothing is getting through since the change on two of my groups.
We don't do a lot of FB but feel that it's important to pass the info along when we do things, especially Fundraisers since FB fundraisers have no charges except foreign exchange charges.  So they are essentially free and people can look at all of the fundraisers even without logging into FB.

Looking for ideas here.

--

Bob Bellizzi

Founder, Fuchs Friends ®
Founder & Executive Director, The Corneal Dystrophy Foundation


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

Michael Pavan
 

Mark,

This effectively is also a non-automated work-around to require Subscription Requests to answer Addition Information Needed questions (sent as a Pending Subscription notice) before the Subscription Request is acted on AND without starting the 14 day Subscription Approval Needed clock.

Thank you,
Michael


As Catlady wrote (#19732):
| Our group usually acts on subscription requests immediately, and so far we have not had to be concerned with the two-week time-out. However, occasionally we get a request where it's necessary to put the membership request on hold until more information is known. We are in the midst of such a request right now and I found myself worrying that this person would time out before we could act on it if getting the info takes more than two weeks, which seems likely.

On Feb 9, 2019, at 12:25 AM, Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:

Hi J,

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@gmail.com> wrote:
In essence, a claim would have the effect of claiming the pending sub not just away from other mods, but also from the timeout procedure.

I've changed it so that claimed pending subscriptions as well as claimed pending messages are not automatically deleted by the system.

Thanks,
Mark


moderated Re: Downtime this morning

Chris Jones
 

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 03:38 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
I was able to quickly restart the nodes and get the site back up at 7:25am.
I certainly found that things were back to normal (in the UK) just before 1530 GMT, which is consistent with your 7.25 am  - I presume PacificTime!

Chris


moderated Re: Downtime this morning

 

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 8:10 AM David Haun via Groups.Io <dmhaun=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
At 10:09am, Central Time, I still can not log-on.

I'm not aware of any issues. Perhaps do a force reload: hold down the shift key while pressing the browser reload button.

Mark 


moderated Re: Downtime this morning

David Haun
 

At 10:09am, Central Time, I still can not log-on.
David


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

typo: the reason for my request in the former thread ("extend claimed-by feature to pending subs")
https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/extend_claimed_by_feature/29587598?p=,,,100,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,100,2,0,29587598

is to convey that specific information.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 07:30 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
Oh doesn't it?
Not in my opinion. "Claimed" conveys that someone has taken something for their own. The sole reason for my request in this thread is to be able to convey that specific information.

The extension to taking the pending sub out of auto-timeout is just that: an extension.
  
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Downtime this morning

 

Hi All,

At 6:25am, two of the seven nodes in our elasticsearch search cluster crashed. This caused connections to the other search nodes to take a very long time. This created a backup which led to the exhaustion of all database connections (in a way similar to what happened yesterday). This caused the site to go down. For reasons I don't know yet, I wasn't paged, so I didn't find out about it until I tried to log in. I was able to quickly restart the nodes and get the site back up at 7:25am.

All your data is safe and everything is back to normal. I will do a proper post mortem and calendar entry later. Sorry for the downtime and any resulting stress.

Thanks,
Mark


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

Chris Jones
 

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 11:47 AM, J_Catlady wrote:
So ‘hold’ doesn’t really fit, semantically or grammatically.
Oh doesn't it?

Chris.


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

The idea is that it is claimed *by* a particular mod. So ‘hold’ doesn’t really fit, semantically or grammatically.


On Feb 9, 2019, at 2:02 AM, Chris Jones via Groups.Io <chrisjones12@...> wrote:

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 05:25 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
I've changed it so that claimed pending subscriptions as well as claimed pending messages are not automatically deleted by the system.
 
Given the actual function can I suggest that "Hold" would be a better term than "Claim"?

Chris

--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

Chris Jones
 

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 05:25 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
I've changed it so that claimed pending subscriptions as well as claimed pending messages are not automatically deleted by the system.
 
Given the actual function can I suggest that "Hold" would be a better term than "Claim"?

Chris


moderated Re: Calendar. Specific day of the week #suggestion

Michael Pavan
 

What isn’t currently possible is to set up a recurring Calendar event for a relative date like Election Day - a date that is x days after (or before) a fixed date, in this case:
the Monday after the first Tuesday of November in even numbered years
which is
6 days after the first Tuesday of November in even numbered years.

The first Tuesday of November in even numbered years is possible
[set up the first date, repeat monthly every 24 months]
but not a date that is 6 days later...


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

Mark,

Like magic! Just suggest something and it gets implemented.;)
Thanks!
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

Hi J,

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
In essence, a claim would have the effect of claiming the pending sub not just away from other mods, but also from the timeout procedure.

I've changed it so that claimed pending subscriptions as well as claimed pending messages are not automatically deleted by the system.

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Site updates #changelog

 

Changes to the site this week:

  • INTERNAL: Work on automating a tool to test database backups.
  • CHANGE: Do not delete pending messages or pending subscriptions older than 14 days if they've been claimed.
  • INTERNAL: Generating a lot more config files automatically through software, to make it easier to change configurations/add machines.
  • INTERNAL: Added ability to off-load queries to replica databases and have started doing so to reduce the load on the main database.
  • NEW: You can now claim pending subscribers.
  • BUGFIX: Event reminders did not include organizer name.
  • NEW: Including a login link in direct add notifications.
  • NEW: You can now invite someone to join a subgroup (they will be added to the parent as well if they accept).

Have a good weekend everyone.

Mark


moderated Re: Wiki requests

KWKloeber
 

Another -- consistency between messages and the wiki. 
You "X Cancel" a message edit, but "X Discard" a wiki page edit.   Is there a functional difference between those?


On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:42 PM, Ken Kloeber wrote:
And please add the “Confirm” warning to the “X Discard” the edited page button?

On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 12:06 PM, Ken Kloeber wrote:
Additionally, seems  Delete and Discard might be forced way right?

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 01:48 AM, Ken Kloeber wrote:
Sure would be more friendly/convenient if

Each display page
  • Had a small "Edit" button at the TOP (like MediaWiki) for logged-in users.


  • It's an unnecessary PITA to have to scroll to the end each time when making and saving multiple edits on a LONG page.

The photo editing options (contrast, etc) dialog box
  • Edits displayed real time, as you move the slide-bar
  • The slide-bar locked onto the keyboard L <=> R arrow keys.
  • Adding a border to and/or a (simple) frame to pix was an option.

While composing/editing
  • pages were saved in Wiki Drafts as are message drafts

The Wiki TOC display box
  • The title could display enhanced text (bolt, color, etc.)
  • Width could be user-set.  Or alternately, to simply have the box free-span across the page.
  • The box is too narrow for long headings to display nicely, especially if there are level 2.3.4 headings in the TOC.


PDFs
  • Could reside in a Wiki space, rather than in the Files space.
  • Could be hidden so they are available to only the wiki viewers or mods.


Re: Integration message moderation change

Bruce Bowman
 

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 07:47 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
This change is definitely causing issues for some groups, especially around calendar notifications/invites. So I think I need to do something.
If folks wanted their various integrations, calendar notices, etc to be moderated, they have always had the ability to edit the corresponding hashtags and/or integration settings to make that happen. To be honest, I feel the best path forward is to revert this change.

Regards,
Bruce


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

In essence, a claim would have the effect of claiming the pending sub not just away from other mods, but also from the timeout procedure.


On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:49 PM J_Catlady via Groups.Io <j.olivia.catlady=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:

Shal,

Interesting thought. I actually think it could make a lot of sense. If a mod claims a pending member, then they're "responsible" for either approving or rejecting the subscription, and timeout should not be needed anyway. Plus, making a claim bypass the timeout lets the mod take whatever time they need to deal with the application. 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

Shal,

Interesting thought. I actually think it could make a lot of sense. If a mod claims a pending member, then they're "responsible" for either approving or rejecting the subscription, and timeout should not be needed anyway. Plus, making a claim bypass the timeout lets the mod take whatever time they need to deal with the application. 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: ability to override two-week timeout on subscription requests #suggestion

 

J,


... it would be infinitely more convenient to be able to individually override subscription request timeouts.
 
Would it make sense to have the Claim function exempt a pending subscription from timeout?

Or is that too cryptic, in the sense of tying the function to an ostensibly unrelated function.

Shal

9841 - 9860 of 29416