moderated
Re: From address re-writing
Hi Mark,
Would that be a global setting and one which anyone can change? Or is it a setting you would "moderate"?
Ken
"And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." God
From: main@beta.groups.io [mailto:main@beta.groups.io]
On Behalf Of Mark Fletcher
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 11:38 PM To: beta@groups.io Subject: Re: [beta] From address re-writing
Hi All,
I had a thought (it happens occasionally, and yeah, I'm surprised too)...
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:43 PM Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:
Both 3 and 4 are at the domain level. Why bother with new group/user settings, when two lists of domains would do a potentially better job? What if I add a section to the help, with an area for someone to input their domain to be added to one of the two lists? Seems like that'd be less complicated/confusing than new settings and would potentially help more people.
Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: From address re-writing
Hi All, I had a thought (it happens occasionally, and yeah, I'm surprised too)... On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:43 PM Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:
Both 3 and 4 are at the domain level. Why bother with new group/user settings, when two lists of domains would do a potentially better job? What if I add a section to the help, with an area for someone to input their domain to be added to one of the two lists? Seems like that'd be less complicated/confusing than new settings and would potentially help more people. Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Improve the "Your group has been approved" notice
I think it's unnecessary and raises unnecessary issues. But I agree that if it belongs anywhere, it's better beforehand, as you say, in the creation process.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 6:07 PM Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote: J, --
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: Improve the "Your group has been approved" notice
J,
I agree with Shal's removal of the part about "unfortunate necessity"Actually, I didn't intend any change to that sentence, only the last one. My apologies for being unclear, when I decided to insert a screenshot of the entire message body I didn't notice that it implied a bigger change than I intended. You don't owe anybody an explanation for why groups must be approved,I don't have a problem with the explanation, but maybe it should (also) be in the web flow for creating the group, if it isn't already (I don't remember), rather than post-facto in the approval notice. Shal
|
|
moderated
Re: Improve the "Your group has been approved" notice
I agree with Shal's removal of the part about "unfortunate necessity" and "people who would abuse the service." You don't owe anybody an explanation for why groups must be approved, and it's unnecessary to call attention to the "people who would abuse the service" etc.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 5:44 PM Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote:
--
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Improve the "Your group has been approved" notice
Mark,
A member of GMF created a new group and incidentally observed: "By the way, my email that said my group was approved said that if I My first thought was to suggest adding a link to the Questions and Bugs section of the help page. One reason not to do that is that links in a short message sometimes tip a message into the "Spam" folder at some email services. So an alternative might be to send the notice From beta's +Help address - which will send the user similar info. Another option would be to rewrite the last sentence: to something like: "Please let us know if you have any questions or suggestions. Go to any Shal
|
|
moderated
Is there a way to reconfigure settings so the index at the top of the digest displays the posters' names
A member on one of my groups.io says she read postings by looking to who wrote them. But she finds the way the postings are configured, she sees the header and not the poster.
Can anyone offer directions on what she could do to make the name of the person who wrote a posting the prominent label? Ellen
|
|
moderated
Re: #featurerequest Google Maps Toggle option for Directions
#suggestion
Bob Bellizzi
Of course it is.
Takes more than a single stroke of the hammer to drive the nail in. -- Bob Bellizzi Founder, Fuchs Friends ®
|
|
moderated
Facebook calendar integration
Just an idea that would make owners and managers life so much easier. Some of us have groups that populate calendar of events to the public. In doing so there is often the need to publish the calendar of events into multiple locations such as Facebook events and so on. I think a way to have Facebook events populate the group calendar or have Groups.io calendar populate Facebook events for a particular page. Also integration with Meetup would also help. Today I post calendar events into 4 different locations. It would be nice to have one where I can post the event and it gets populated to all the others. Liam
|
|
moderated
Re: From address re-writing
KWKloeber
How’s that workin out for Mark? 😳🥺😱😉😜🤪🥺🤯 Ken
|
|
moderated
Re: #featurerequest Google Maps Toggle option for Directions
#suggestion
Bob,
This seems to be a repeat of part of your previous request at https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/29189236#19607 Or am I missing something? Andy
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site this week:
Have a good weekend everyone. Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: From address re-writing
I wrote:
Or not. #4 applies to all messages to that account, not just the user's own messages. If exposed as a user Account control it would probably need to be a separate control from the one for one's own messages. Likewise in the group's Default Sub. Settings. So, yeah, it is a little less slick than I was thinking. Shal P.S. My apologies to you Windows nerds out there for accidentally speaking the devil's name. You know who you are because you heard it go "clang" in your mind when you read it. The rest of you are safe.
|
|
moderated
Re: From address re-writing
John, Me having a Yahoo address, my From line has been rewritten from the beginning, and I'm happy with that. You're talking about case #1 in Mark's message. I don't think he's proposing any changes to that case. If I suddenly switched domains to one that didn't need rewriting, but the option were there to enable it anyway, I would likely take that option. I like that recipients can easily distinguish using the From line if I posted or am directly mailing them. I don't think you need that option to get that effect. Depending on the other members' email interfaces of course. Many of them (including Gmail at least) mark list messages as "via groups.io" even when the From address is not re-written. Tight groups of members, which are likely to all be on one particular domain, might prefer it the other way, where the From line reflects the member's email address. If I have a team of 20 from whatever.org, and I want to auto-filter all mail from whatever.org in some way, having to worry about a groups.io domain complicates things. What happens in that case depends on where "whatever.org" buys its email service. If the email service they hired (or if they run their own and it) publishes the DMARC reject policy in its DNS entries then the From address rewriting is pretty much required on any list message from a user of that domain. That would be an all-or-none situation for the team from whatever.org. Usually the better filter choice is to use the group's subject tag. That could catch off-list messages from team members if the message started as a reply to a list message, but it is a judgement call whether the user would have wanted that to happen. Best is to filter based on the List-Id header field, but sadly I suspect that relatively few people use an interface that can do that, or would know how to do that if they could. Shal
|
|
moderated
Re: From address re-writing
Mark,
Not true. I proposed that it work like the Time Zone, Time Display, and Date Display controls on the Default Sub Settings. Those correspond to Account (not Subscription) controls.
The Account control always takes precedence, the Default Sub Setting only applies when a new account is created. Now we could, and probably should, consider splitting these Account-related controls into a separate "Default Acct. Settings" tab in the group's settings page, for clarity on what they apply to and how. Or at least put section boxes around the defaults for new Subscriptions versus those for new Accounts.
I think my idea would handle your #2, #3, and #4. In the case of #2 I'd have the "gmail.com" test, when true, take precedence over the group's Def Sub Setting when creating a new account. Likewise in the case of #4 when a domain matches your internal list could take precedence. Granted that does mean that the group's Default Sub Setting for this becomes more of a hint than a control. If this seems too mysterious, you could have a sentence under the control (in the user's Account page) that says "This feature turned on because your email address is at gmail.com" or "... is handled by an Exchange server", or "... group XYZ chose that default for you". In the case of #3 would it be useful for you to keep a system-wide list of domains "known" to be handled by gmail.com? I don't know if those are all essentially "vanity" domains used by one or a very few accounts, or if some of them are larger organizations that outsource their email service and many new accounts would benefit from you having noticing them. Nor am I entirely sure how you would "notice" them other than something creepily Amazon-like ("you have this default because most users of your email domain prefer this setting").
Does that mean in those cases you would disable the control in the user's Account page? That might be appropriate. Or maybe it would be better to let the user experiment with the consequences of un-setting it. Maybe users who un-set it and keep it that way represent a valuable signal that the list might be in error, or needing some form of refinement. Shal
|
|
moderated
Re: From address re-writing
Me having a Yahoo address, my From line has been rewritten from the beginning, and I'm happy with that. If I suddenly switched domains to one that didn't need rewriting, but the option were there to enable it anyway, I would likely take that option. I like that recipients can easily distinguish using the From line if I posted or am directly mailing them.
Tight groups of members, which are likely to all be on one particular domain, might prefer it the other way, where the From line reflects the member's email address. If I have a team of 20 from whatever.org, and I want to auto-filter all mail from whatever.org in some way, having to worry about a groups.io domain complicates things. It's not something that couldn't be worked around, just more complicated. I don't know if anyone actually does this; I just like to think up situations where something would be harder. JohnF
|
|
moderated
Re: From address re-writing
I don't know any of the general answers, but I would like to reiterate that currently, the bcc on a Send Message to member is not being handled properly in gmail and still (or rather, again, since after the "From" rewriting for the other messages sent back to the same member) results in the spam warning.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:44 PM Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:
--
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
From address re-writing
Hi All, Resurrecting this topic: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/19201016 There seem to be four cases where we need to re-write the From address (and possibly Reply-To/CC) in a message: 1) When DMARC says we have to, we re-write the From line in messages *from* that domain. 2) When someone is on a @gmail.com domain, we need to re-write the From line in messages that they originate that we send back to them. 3) When someone is using Gmail on a different domain, we need to re-write the From line in messages that they originate that we send back to them (same as #2 except we can't use a simple @gmail.com check). 4) The From line in all messages sent *to* (many/most) Exchange servers. We currently do 1 and 2. From the other topic, here are the proposed new settings: - Per user setting to have all From lines re-written in messages to themselves. - Per group setting to have all From lines re-written in messages sent within the group. Shal proposed the group setting be in the default sub settings page. But I don't know how that would work. None of those existing settings have a corresponding user setting, which makes it easy to just use them when creating a subscription. If this was a default sub setting, how would we know when to use the default sub setting vs the user's setting? I also propose a third, system wide, maintained by me list of domains that are known to run Exchange/corresponding to #4 above. This list of domains would over-rule the per-user and per-group setting in forcing From line re-writing of messages sent to those domains. I'd ask people with knowledge of these domains to send them to me. Thoughts? Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
#featurerequest Google Maps Toggle option for Directions
#suggestion
Bob Bellizzi
Mark,
The map in Premium & Enterprise groups is a great idea. A killer addition would be to have the option to switch between a straight map and Google Directions so that once you settle on a database identified place you could switch to Directions to find your way there. -- Bob Bellizzi Founder, Fuchs Friends ®
|
|
moderated
Re: Virus scanning
Chris Jones
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:59 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Mark; thanks for the prompt reply! :) Chris
|
|