moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site this week:
Have a good weekend everyone. Mark
|
|
moderated
We are caught up
Hi All,
As of this morning, we've completely worked through the backlog of Yahoo Group transfer requests. It took 29 days, but we did it. :-)
I've removed the option to pay for a priority transfer.
I'm still only responding to support emails from premium group owners right now. There's just too much otherwise. Also, the beta group is still moderated.
A reminder: please get your transfer requests in by the end of the month.
Thanks,
Mark
|
|
moderated
Site updates
#changelog
Changes to the site this week:
Have a good weekend everyone. Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Yahoo Group transfer update
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:11 AM Melissa Daston <mdaston@...> wrote: Appreciate your tremendous efforts to improve the process. My group went from #80 to done. I know it's been a big effort and new costs with new servers to host and to process transfers. We were able to add 3.4M messages yesterday, besting yesterday's record by 1M messages. We are no longer falling further behind with transfers, and are starting to (slowly) catch up. As of now, we're importing groups that were exported on Oct 26 at 8am. There is a large variability in the number of messages groups have (the number of messages being the biggest factor for how long it takes to import a group). So if you're watching your spot in the queue, it won't decrease at a steady pace. Some groups have a few hundred messages; the largest group we've imported had over 600k messages. We're currently importing 6 groups at once. Out of curiosity are you running your own server farm or leasing space to host the groups? All the machine instances are leased. I've racked enough machines in my time to know I never want to do that again. It also gives me flexibility to quickly add or remove machines at the touch of a button. Thanks, Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Yahoo Group transfer update
Melissa Daston
Appreciate your tremendous efforts to improve the process. My group went from #80 to done. I know it's been a big effort and new costs with new servers to host and to process transfers.
Out of curiosity are you running your own server farm or leasing space to host the groups? Melissa
|
|
moderated
Re: Yahoo Group transfer update
We are at 67 and 68 in the queue at 10 am CST so we have moved forward over 100 groups since yesterday afternoon. We now expect to be transferred today or tonight. Very exciting!
It has been slightly slower the past 30 minutes to 1 hour, maybe a huge group being imported now? Many Thanks for speeding up the process and getting us to the finish line earlier than we had expected before! Janis
|
|
moderated
Moderating the group for now
Hi All, I'm temporarily setting Beta to moderated until, probably, mid-December. I have no bandwidth to consider new features right now as I focus on transferring over all the groups, keeping the site up and working with the folks in Spain on the app. So any messages posted asking about or discussing new features during that time will be wasted on me, and will be rejected. Thanks for your understanding. Mark
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:06 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 02:04 PM, Victoria wrote:But apart from that, as I wrote in my last message it is exactly that functionality and that easy handling of links that Dave, Susan and Janis mentioned which is being talked about here. And moving it to wiki doesn´t change this at all. So why not simply accept that different people can have different needs? Victoria
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 02:05 PM, Janis wrote:
I never had any problem at all with using Yahoo and have used it for 20 yearsYou've dodged a lot of bullets. I don't know the statistics, but many if not most groups had their files start disappearing, messages being delayed for hours and in some cases not post at all, members being completely unable to unsub because the unsubscribe feature was broken, etc. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: Yahoo Group transfer update
Thanks, Mark! We have moved over 150 places in the past two days and still moving! Our positions just moved to 198 and 199 a few minutes ago. I was expecting tge tranfer to take another 10 days. Now I have alerted my group members to expect their Welcome message in 2 or 3 days, or the weekend at tge latest! We are thrilled with the faster speed! 😄😄😄😄
Thank you so much!
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 02:04 PM, Victoria wrote:
We had a link-collection that wasn´t transformed correctly to GIOBut that is a different issue. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
My groups made goodnuse of the easily usable links page at Yahoo Groups. I would definitely appreciate havingbthe same functionality exactly thevway it was set up at Yahoo
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
My work around here for links is to add them to messages with a comment and the Hashtag #Links used in the Topic. But the Yahoo tool is a better. I did not use folders for the links. I did not want to have to.ooen folders to see links. In some groups on Groups.io I have a topic entitled Links and it has the Links hashtag so we can add new links to this topic. I do not want to be bothered setting up avdatabase for links. I already have enough to do. As for all the comments about Yahoo, I have had several groups there and been a member of several more. I never had any problem at all with using Yahoo and have used it for 20 years on numerous devices. It always functioned the way it was supposed to. The only oroblem my group members ever had with itbwas forgetting their password or Yahoo ID. I could not help them with their passwords but I have emailed several people their Yahoo ID they forgot. Then they could log in. We are all.mad at Yahoo, but I am only mad because they are wiping our online group content Dec. 14. And we should have at least through Dec. 31 to save our archives.Many groups do not care about that and are not moving. But mad as I am,we are not here to trash Yahoo Groups. It served us well for years!
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019, Bob Bellizzi <cdfexec@...> wrote: And just think about using a WIKI page for links.
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 01:41 PM, Bob Bellizzi wrote:
you can make that Wiki Page a Sticky Wiki pageExactly right. There is actually *more* functionality here, not less, for posting links (and other material). A dedicated Links page is really just an anachronism. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
Take the example of a main folder for eye disorders, subfolders for glaucoma, cataract and so on... Then in each subfolder you could find links concerning these special issues and their description. By clicking on the description the respective link opended. Same with all the other dozens of medical issues like respiratory diseases, heart, liver, bladder, and, and, and...You just went there and a collection of links of the latest research results were available. Users can then add new "links" with no more effort than than clicking on "Add row" and pasting a link and optionally typing in some descriptive info and clicking on "Save Row". That´s not what we need and according to my above description it´s far less comfortable. In fact, the yahoo version was a very user friendly application, very easy to handle and very clearly aranged. It´s the one feature I am really missing, for the handling of databases seems much more complicated to me, and folders/subfolders, quickly installed, were such a work simplification. In fact, if you have a group migrated from Yahoo, there will already by a links database so all the Owner/Moderator has to do is to allow I understand Dave´s submissions very well, and maybe there is a way to get close to that easy handling of links some day, although I see that at the moment of more important issues all these feature requests have to stand back.
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
Bob Bellizzi
Rude?
Sorry that you misunderstood that I was telling you how, on gio, one can take advantage of features to feature speciially important parts of the group's information that otherwise requires change of context. GIO provides lots of handy features that should have been implemented on Yahoo. -- Bob Bellizzi
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
Funny because I was going to ask you the same thing. You make it personal.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Please don’t do that. We’re talking about a software product. There’s no need to continually characterize my opinions. Simply express your own.
On Nov 5, 2019, at 1:51 PM, Susan B <doggiesmail@...> wrote:
--
J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
Why are you so rude?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Nov 5, 2019, at 3:57 PM, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
Bob Bellizzi
And just think about using a WIKI page for links.
If they're so important you can make that Wiki Page a Sticky Wiki page at the top of your message page so members ca n easily access the important StickyWiki Page promptly without losing context -- Bob Bellizzi
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:56 PM, J_Catlady wrote:
in a file, in a wiki page, in a sticky message, wherever.or even, as others have pointed out, in a database, if that's what gets you off. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: Improved Links Functionality
#suggestion
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:52 PM, Susan B wrote:
links are extremely important to our groupGreat! Then understand that groups.io has not taken links away from your group. You are as free to post them as you ever were - in a file, in a wiki page, in a sticky message, wherever. You can call the file "Important links." You can call the wiki page "Important links to xyz" where zyz is the relevant topic. Etc. In no way does groups.io limit your ability to post links simply by not having a separate page called "Links." -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|