On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:53 PM Andy Wedge <andy_wedge@...> wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 09:12 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote: I'm unable to reproduce this; I can set up a meeting with either PMI or as One Time. Can you try again and then reply to me off-list with the exact time you tried it? I'll see if I can spot anything in the logs. Thanks, Mark
|
|
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 09:12 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Yes, the pop-up panel is stable now. Thanks. It still only works with a Personal Meeting Id (PMI) at present as the One Time Meeting option generates no Zoom meeting link. Thanks Andy
|
|
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:04 PM Andy Wedge <andy_wedge@...> wrote:
I was just working on that. Should be fixed now. Thanks, Mark
|
|
Hi Mark,
when I click the 'Make this a Zoom meeting' button the pop-up panel where you enter the Zoom meeting details opens and immediately closes repeatedly preventing entry of details. I've tested this on Firefox and Chrome and it's the same each time. Regards, Andy
|
|
moderated
Re: "Subscriber was removed for marking a message as spam" notification
#suggestion
Thank You Bruce. It seems that a number of our users over time have been removed for marking as spam. When I contact them with my gmail address they didn't do it. And when I ask them to carefully examine their inbox and spam folders for an email that has a link to reinstate themselves they almost always never find one. I have no idea if this is because their provider, since they just marked GIO as spam just tosses it and never delivers it even to the spam folder, or if they are not technical (many of our users are not) and just don't know what to look for.
John P
|
|
moderated
Re: "Subscriber was removed for marking a message as spam" notification
#suggestion
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:51 AM, Michael wrote:
In my experience, nobody has ever decided to leave the group by marking a message as spam, rather, it is always their email *client* deciding something is spam and causing them to be dropped.My own experience is about 50:50. The "dropping them like a hot potato" because of an automated spam message situation causes headaches for admins and users alike.It was not my intent to restart the FBL debate. I'm just seeking a more proactive way to help someone when they invariably <vernacular on> freak out <vernacular off> about it. Regards, Bruce
|
|
moderated
Re: "Subscriber was removed for marking a message as spam" notification
#suggestion
Michael
In my experience, nobody has ever decided to leave the group by marking a message as spam, rather, it is always their email *client* deciding something is spam and causing them to be dropped.
Then they come to me wanting to know why they aren't getting messages, or I mention to them, if I don't miss the notice, and they are confused, because they got no notice, (perhaps it went into the spam folder too). The "dropping them like a hot potato" because of an automated spam message situation causes headaches for admins and users alike.
|
|
moderated
Re: "Subscriber was removed for marking a message as spam" notification
#suggestion
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:02 AM, Bruce Bowman wrote:
More generally, we need some way that a group Owner can resend that link to the [ex-]member.My understanding is that the link to resubscribe is personalised to the member that was removed. In that sense, receiving a copy of it would suggest getting an element of control over an account that may not be appropriate. Having the ability to resend the link could be useful though and perhaps sending it as a personal or private message rather than a system message from Groups.io would reduce the chance of it being treated as spam at the receiver's end. Andy
|
|
moderated
Re: Email only footer for users without http/s access
#suggestion
Most email clients will recognise a hyperlink in a plain text email and
make it clickable. They don't always get it right.... I think what was being asked was that the email commands for unsubscribing etc should be shown so they can be used (clickable mailto: or whatever, remember if they are they they can still be manually typed in a new email). The existing links to the web interface are no use for email only users who have never set a password for web access. Dave On 11 May 2020 at 18:40, Bruce Bowman wrote: By definition, the plain text messages sent by groups.io cannot contain http://davesergeant.com
|
|
moderated
Re: "Subscriber was removed for marking a message as spam" notification
#suggestion
That seems a sensible suggestion Bruce.
As an aside, we currently have one member with Virgin Media who gets unsubscribed regular. He has clearly sorted out what happens since he resubscribes in just a few minutes each time, and has not contacted me to complain. But is there a specific issue with Virgin Media at the moment? Dave On 11 May 2020 at 16:08, Bruce Bowman wrote: It would be useful of the notification sent to the +owner address when http://davesergeant.com
|
|
moderated
Re: Email only footer for users without http/s access
#suggestion
Peter Mott <peter@...>
Raw source below. It is reasonable for an email client to hyperlink the unsubscribe link, there is no way the user can unsubscribe using email. Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#9): https://groups.io/g/zmh292/message/9 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/74013589/547764 Mute #sked: https://groups.io/mk?hashtag=3Dsked&subid=3D8279501 -=3D-=3D-
-=3D-=3D- Group Owner: zmh292+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/zmh292/unsub [peter@northlandmaritimerad= io.nz] -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
|
|
moderated
Re: NC Status Clarification
#bug
Mark,
Ok, I guess something different happened. I'll admit I didn't click through to prove that I could. I just took the site's word for it. There does seem to be some confusion here. When first claiming one could create groups I hadn't noticed the big headline: The address in question is invalid. In fact it is in Bouncing status (but not NC) per shalstest's Pending Members list. I expected it to be both. So I'm not sure how this address escaped NC status, unless there was some automatic response from my email service that "smelled" like a reply to the confirmation request. Shal
|
|
moderated
Re: NC Status Clarification
#bug
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:14 PM, Shal Farley wrote:
I think that's it: easier to create the account on the spot so that the user can go ahead with filling in their options & profile while they wait for the confirmation to arrive.I think that it is more literally because it's a placeholder in the sense that creating the account a priori prevents anyone else from signing up with the same email address while it's in process. It behaves like it is perfectly realThat's a matter of definition. There are things it does do and things it doesn't do. I think the word "real" is meaningless. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
|
|
moderated
Re: NC Status Clarification
#bug
J,
I would think of these NC “accounts” as placeholders.That's a reasonable view. It’s probably just easier for Mark to create an “account” before theI think that's it: easier to create the account on the spot so that the user can go ahead with filling in their options & profile while they wait for the confirmation to arrive. It behaves like it is perfectly real, in much the same way that a Bouncing (or Bounced) account is still real, but can't receive group postings by email until the NC status is cleared. Shal
|
|
moderated
Re: NC Status Clarification
#bug
John,
It shows that an account with an incorrect email address is createdThat's because NC only refers to whether the user has confirmed the email address that they typed into the Sign-up page. It has nothing to do with their activity on the web.* Shal *Perhaps except as later clarified by Mark concerning group creation.
|
|
moderated
Re: Email only footer for users without http/s access
#suggestion
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 08:50 PM, Peter Mott wrote:
The group is already set to Plain Text Only in the message formatting block, but message footers still contain clickable hyperlinks to http pages.By definition, the plain text messages sent by groups.io cannot contain hyperlinks. If recipient's email client sees a link address and converts it to a hyperlink, that's another matter...but that behavior is not in groups.io's control. Regards, Bruce
|
|
moderated
Re: Email only footer for users without http/s access
#suggestion
Peter Mott <peter@...>
Hi Bruce,
The group is already set to Plain Text Only in the message formatting block, but message footers still contain clickable hyperlinks to http pages. regards Peter
|
|
moderated
"Subscriber was removed for marking a message as spam" notification
#suggestion
It would be useful of the notification sent to the +owner address when someone is unsubbed for this reason contained the same "resume subscription" link that was originally sent to the affected member. That way, if he panicked and deleted the resume message, I could forward him the notification I received and help get him back into the group that way.
More generally, we need some way that a group Owner can resend that link to the [ex-]member. Seven days of expiration does not help if the one and only message sent to him is irretrievably lost. Thanks for your consideration, Bruce
|
|
moderated
Re: NC Status Clarification
#bug
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 02:39 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
I've changed the text from 'Logged in:' to 'They accessed the web from:'.Typo sneaked in, forgot the 'y' in They (or a bug ate it?). Thanks much, Duane
|
|
moderated
Re: NC Status Clarification
#bug
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 6:42 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote: I think the problem is semantics. The language used for NC members is that they "don't yet have an account." That should read "don't yet have a confirmed account." I don't know all the places that language exists, but it floats around here and there and should probably be clarified. If you see any instances of this on the web or in notifications, please let me know and I'll clarify. Thanks, Mark
|
|