Date   

moderated Re: Strip out more common email sigs #suggestion

 

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:46:56 +0100, Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:

As for the Avast ads, I agree that they're super annoying. Unfortunately, they're tricky to catch because the company is always changing the text/links. So it's difficult to write code to find all of them.

I didn't think it would be easy Mark - especially for AV software in general rather than just Avast.

Still, if you ever think of a way to do it, please do.
 

 
For AVG Free users it can be done manually.
Open AVG and go to Menu > Settings
Under "Basic protection" - "Email Shield", UNcheck "Add a signature to the end of sent emails."
 
Someone please correct this if you find it doesn't work.
 
Dano
 
 
 


moderated Re: Strip out more common email sigs #suggestion

Malcolm Austen
 

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:46:56 +0100, Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:

As for the Avast ads, I agree that they're super annoying. Unfortunately, they're tricky to catch because the company is always changing the text/links. So it's difficult to write code to find all of them.

Sure, I didn't think it would be easy Mark - especially for AV software in general rather than just Avast.

Still, if you ever think of a way to do it, please do.

Malcolm.

--
Malcolm Austen - email: malcolm.austen@...


moderated Re: Strip out more common email sigs #suggestion

Malcolm Austen
 

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:43:13 +0100, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:04 AM, Malcolm Austen wrote:
the common AV advert
Does that mean Avast? If not, those should also be removed.

I meant any AV software, not just Avast although that seems to be the most common offender of late.

Malcolm.

--
Malcolm Austen - email: malcolm.austen@...


moderated Re: "Last successful delivery" link goes to topic, not message, if member chooses to follow a topic #bug

 

Mark,

Ok, good that it goes to a message. The problem is that it's going to the first message of a topic, when actually the member received the last message in the topic. I can no longer send you the exact case because the member's history has changed since then, but I will try to do a test in my test group and send you the results.

Thanks.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:54 PM Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 7:01 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
When someone changes to Following Only and then choose to follow some topic, their "Most Recent Successful Delivery" in their email delivery history goes to the first message in that topic rather than the last one. In other words, the link is to the topic as a whole, not actually to the last message they received. My understanding is that the last successful delivery is supposed to rever to a message. So this seems like a bug (either in the sense that it goes to the topic, or that it's going to the wrong message).

I just checked the code, and it does go to a message. If you're seeing something strange, can you reply off-list with the name of the group and the member's email address?

Thanks,
Mark 


--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: "Last successful delivery" link goes to topic, not message, if member chooses to follow a topic #bug

 

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 7:01 PM J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:
When someone changes to Following Only and then choose to follow some topic, their "Most Recent Successful Delivery" in their email delivery history goes to the first message in that topic rather than the last one. In other words, the link is to the topic as a whole, not actually to the last message they received. My understanding is that the last successful delivery is supposed to rever to a message. So this seems like a bug (either in the sense that it goes to the topic, or that it's going to the wrong message).

I just checked the code, and it does go to a message. If you're seeing something strange, can you reply off-list with the name of the group and the member's email address?

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Strip out more common email sigs #suggestion

 

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 6:38 AM Andy Wedge <andy_wedge@...> wrote:








| www.emclient.com
    (Note: not prefixed with 'Sent')




I've added these, thanks.

As for the Avast ads, I agree that they're super annoying. Unfortunately, they're tricky to catch because the company is always changing the text/links. So it's difficult to write code to find all of them.

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Strip out more common email sigs #suggestion

 

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:04 AM, Malcolm Austen wrote:
the common AV advert
Does that mean Avast? If not, those should also be removed.
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Subject tags in non-group posts #bug

 

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:42 AM Tanya's Feline CKD Website <helen@...> wrote:

What I am flagging as a bug is the endless repetition of these subject tags. One is now being added every time the mods write to each other, or whenever the mods communicate privately with group members. A current thread running behind the scenes of my group has four at the moment. You can't see the actual subject line for all the subject tags! Could it please just entirely disappear (my preference) or just remain at one subject tag at most.

Definitely sounds like a bug. How are these messages being sent? Are you just sending messages to +owner?

Thanks,
Mark 


moderated Re: Subject tags in non-group posts #bug

Malcolm Austen
 

This may not be the same issue but certainly since a change several months ago I have been aware that emails to +owner have the prefix text prefixed to them even if the text is already there ...

I just have not had time to study it properly/fully for a report ...

Malcolm.

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:08:47 +0100, Tanya's Feline CKD Website <helen@felineckd.com> wrote:

Popping my head above the parapet because this is driving me mad.

I hate having subject tags on posts that are not sent directly to the group itself. This is a recentissh change that has made it a lot harder to filter messages where they need to go in my e-mail program (e.g. just found a few subscription approval requests in the folder for that group's messages). But I don't get my requests granted, so I'm just sucking it up .

What I am flagging as a bug is the endless repetition of these subject tags. One is now being added every time the mods write to each other, or whenever the mods communicate privately with group members. A current thread running behind the scenes of my group has four at the moment. You can't see the actual subject line for all the subject tags! Could it please just entirely disappear (my preference) or just remain at one subject tag at most.

Thanks

Helen (not Tanya)



--
Malcolm Austen - email: malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk


moderated Subject tags in non-group posts #bug

 

Popping my head above the parapet because this is driving me mad.

I hate having subject tags on posts that are not sent directly to the group itself. This is a recentissh change that has made it a lot harder to filter messages where they need to go in my e-mail program (e.g. just found a few subscription approval requests in the folder for that group's messages). But I don't get my requests granted, so I'm just sucking it up .

What I am flagging as a bug is the endless repetition of these subject tags. One is now being added every time the mods write to each other, or whenever the mods communicate privately with group members. A current thread running behind the scenes of my group has four at the moment. You can't see the actual subject line for all the subject tags! Could it please just entirely disappear (my preference) or just remain at one subject tag at most.

Thanks

Helen (not Tanya)


moderated Re: Strip out more common email sigs #suggestion

Malcolm Austen
 

Ooo, could we add the common AV advert appendages to that list please?

Malcolm.

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:24:33 +0100, Andy Wedge <andy_wedge@...> wrote:

Hi Mark,

Following on from a previous Changelog I have a few suggestions to add to the list of common email sigs to strip out:

Sent from the all-new AOL app for Android
Sent from my Galaxy
Sent from Samsung Mobile on O2
Sent from my Huawei phone
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Sent from Outlook Mobile
Sent from Nine
Sent from eM Client | www.emclient.com
from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone    (Note: not prefixed with 'Sent')
Sent from my Samsung device
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
Get Outlook for Android

Thanks
Andy



--
Malcolm Austen - email: malcolm.austen@...


moderated Strip out more common email sigs #suggestion

Andy Wedge
 

Hi Mark,

Following on from a previous Changelog I have a few suggestions to add to the list of common email sigs to strip out:

Sent from the all-new AOL app for Android
Sent from my Galaxy
Sent from Samsung Mobile on O2
Sent from my Huawei phone
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Sent from Outlook Mobile
Sent from Nine
Sent from eM Client | www.emclient.com
from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone    (Note: not prefixed with 'Sent')
Sent from my Samsung device
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
Get Outlook for Android

Thanks
Andy


moderated "Last successful delivery" link goes to topic, not message, if member chooses to follow a topic #bug

 

When someone changes to Following Only and then choose to follow some topic, their "Most Recent Successful Delivery" in their email delivery history goes to the first message in that topic rather than the last one. In other words, the link is to the topic as a whole, not actually to the last message they received. My understanding is that the last successful delivery is supposed to rever to a message. So this seems like a bug (either in the sense that it goes to the topic, or that it's going to the wrong message).
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Beta Group Guidelines #meta

 

>>> Why is this thread in the Group Guidelines topic?

It's kind of "mission creep", it just happened so as it seems to happen occasionally, but Mark can always take the question and the subsequent replies to it and split it into a new #misc topic, and that will clean this GG topic.
 
Cheers,
Christos


moderated Re: Beta Group Guidelines #meta

 

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:49 AM, Christos G. Psarras wrote:

 

>>> If you reply with +1 as message text and leave the original post below, your reply apparently vanishes in thin air and does not show in the group.

This is by design, using email, you can either like a post or reply to a post, but you can't do both in the same reply.

That did not happen in my test. I didn't trim the prior post, I used gmail, and the Like was recorded just fine. If you reply to a message using a quote of the prior message *above* your message, then that's another story, and it will not go through because the +1 isn't there solely on its own. But the +1 goes through perfectly if the prior text is below, treated as a prior post, even if untrimmed. Groups.io does not treat it as part of the reply. I don't know what went wrong in Marina's case but maybe for some reason, the prior text was placed above, rather than below, her +1. (Why is this thread in the Group Guidelines topic? In accordance with GG, I will stop here...)
 
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Beta Group Guidelines #meta

 

Marina,

>>> I've just run a test in my group by replying to a post via Gmail and found out that the Like is recorded only if the reply doesn't quote the original post (i.e. you trim the post "tail")

I also tested this a couple of days ago in a beta/docs topic, albeit not from Gmail but from my local Thunderbird app.  One can either reply to a message with +1 (or Like) as the only message body text, or reply but leave the quoted text in the message below, and add +1 as the first line.  In both cases the like was recorded, I guess with the non-moderated stipulation J mentioned (which I didn't know but it's good to know)


>>> If you reply with +1 as message text and leave the original post below, your reply apparently vanishes in thin air and does not show in the group.

This is by design, using email, you can either like a post or reply to a post, but you can't do both in the same reply.  Correctly-formatted email Like "replies" get recorded as Likes to the replied-to message/post but the message itself is not entered in the archive. (again I guess with the non-moderated stipulation)

Cheers,
Christos



moderated Re: Beta Group Guidelines #meta

 

I've used +1 for years and it has always worked, and still does work, fine (I just tested it). However, I just discovered one exception: if the member sending the +1 is moderated, the message requires approval and after approval, becomes a reply message instead of a Like. So I think +1's should not be subject to moderation. I don't know if the problem you were having was related to that.
--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Re: Beta Group Guidelines #meta

Marina
 

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 08:15 AM, Andy Wedge wrote:
If you reply to a post by email and just put +1 as your message text, it will be recorded as a Like.
Sorry for reviving this topic.
I've just run a test in my group by replying to a post via Gmail and found out that the Like is recorded only if the reply doesn't quote the original post (i.e. you trim the post "tail").
If you reply with +1 as message text and leave the original post below, your reply apparently vanishes in thin air and does not show in the group.

Marina


moderated Log members' editing of auto-signature #suggestion

 

Our group uses the auto-sig to carry a group member's cat's brief medical history, current medications, etc. We ask people to keep their sigs up to date. Sometimes they do that, sometimes they don't. Although most of our group members are comfortable using the web, there are some who only use email, and in those cases a request by us to "please update your signature to delete/add that medication," or whatever, often goes nowhere. It would be helpful log members' editing of their sigs (just as changing of their display names and other elements of their membership are logged), in order to know when people are (vs. are not) making needed changes. Then, if we see they're not, we can go in and do it for them. Conversely, if someone edits their sig out of the blue, it is often illuminating to see what changes in diagnosis, medications, symptoms, etc. they made.


--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu


moderated Site updates #changelog

 

Changes to the site this week:

June 11, 2021:

  • NEW: Stripe connect should now work for Enterprise groups looking to set up donations.
  • BUGFIX: Fixed infinite scroll in the app in the View RSVPs page. Discussion
  • CHANGE: In full digests, we were limiting the number of attachments per message to 2. Now we limit the number of included images to 2, but include all other attachments (as links back to the website, as before).

June 10, 2021:

  • DOCS: Updates to the Members Manual and the Owners Manual from Nina.
  • BUGFIX: The Preview button when adding/editing a Markdown formatted Member Notice did not work.
  • BUGFIX: The Back button on the Add/Event event page did not work correctly for people with date preferences other than the default US format. Discussion
  • CHANGE: Limit the chat text entry window to 3 lines. This fixes the bug where the text area could be hidden under the mobile/app footer. Also, it's just a good idea. Discussion

June 9, 2021:

  • SYSADMIN: Migrated primary pgbouncer instance to a dedicated CPU instance for better performance.
  • BUGFIX: When viewing a pending member in the /member page, we were checking the Remove Members privilege instead of the Approve Pending Members privilege to determine if the moderator could reject the pending member.

June 8, 2021:

  • APP BUGFIX: When editing an event in the app, sometimes the date picker fields were not initialized correctly. Discussion
  • APP BUGFIX: Using the back button/swipe to return to the Groups page would cause infinite scrolling to not work. Discussion
  • INTERNAL: More work on improving tests and the test harness.

June 7, 2021:

  • BUGFIX: Re-sent invites had potentially incorrect expiration dates. Discussion
  • CHANGE: Margin formatting tweaks in the chat window.
  • BUGFIX: An error prevented viewing a +owner message via an activity log message from a person who is no longer a member of the group.

Take care everyone.

Mark

301 - 320 of 29729