I'm reminded of a prior suggestion I made here about a "Like" automatically creating a follow record. Can that be done? If the person Unlikes, I don't think you'd have to worry about unfollowing. (Or

Mark -- I'm starting to get more than a little confused. Are "follow topic" records now being created for the originator of a topic (and those who reply to it) regardless of the topic/group/hashtag

Yes it can be done, but should it? I say no. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

Something else that might occur is I join groups.io before I join any groups (I actually did that) and know thst im going to be creating some paid groups and want to enter my billing info at thst

So, I'm a software engineer for Second Life. We have over 2.6 million resident groups in our system and we provide realtime group information, include roles for a member. The simple db

Just refreshed my memory by looking back at the old topics addressing this. I have a suggestion. You can use the new `Reply To Followers Only` topic setting to move discussions `off-list` (that is,

Let's see... Let's say 100,000 groups, 5,000,000 accounts, at least 3 possible roles per account. True, a computer can figure all that out, but it takes computing cycles to do it. It would have to

This is not a simple piece of data in the account. The monitoring required to maintain it would be nontrivial. Any time a group changed the Donations toggle, all the group members would have to be

I still disagree with the basic premise. Suppose I am the owner of a premium group and have entered my billing info. Should that simply disappear when I downgrade or delete the group? I'm not talking

Exactly! I'm thinking that I should have been more explicit/precise in my original suggestion. I would think that somewhere in the back-end of groups.io is my profile that says what groups I am a

And that's not even mentioning that any member of your group can be the owner of some other group and needs to able to pay for it. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the

Thanks, Mark. Since there is no Reply-To-Sender message footer link in plaintext formatted groups like ours we must either copy & paste the email address between headers in the mail reader, or click

Sure, no problem. It's because they might be in other groups that do have Donations turned on. You're still talking as if you think users are in only one group: yours. Whereas they may be (and often

Only group owners have the ability to turn on/off the Donations functionality for their groups. If I, as a group owner, don't want Donations enabled for my group and therefore don't enable the Stripe

Can you give me some more information as to why the Reply To Sender stuff is a problem for your group? And what would the List-Post header get you? Thanks, Mark

Missed another one! Need to change "Thread 'bla bla bla' was deleted because of an expired hashtag" to "Topic bla bla bla was deleted" -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially

Mark -- Here's a reminder that this bug still remains to be fixed. Got another report on it in GMF this morning. Regards, Bruce

The various Reply To Sender contortions continues to be an irritating hassle for our group. Would it be possible to implement the List-Post email header as an option for those groups that want it? It

Still feels like a basic disconnect here. Donations on or off is only an indirect function of the account. You’d have to continually check all the groups the user is in. -- J Messages are the sole

I've noticed that when grayed out, it can be difficult to distinguish the text color from 'normal'. If it's not too much trouble, maybe use the ban icon in front of (or behind?) anything not