J -- Are you talking about Member Notes? I use Member Notes mainly to log past issues with each user's compliance with group guidelines. If this can be cleared by simply leaving and rejoining, I

Not sure what you mean. There's nothing unusual about the digest. Do you mean a screenshot of her blank Thunderbird windwo when she tries to reply? -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

Any chance of a screenshot or two from the bottom of the digest? Chris

and apparently, that does work, AND gets threaded properly. I'm not sure whether the line "Do not reply to this email. To reply to one of the messages in the digest, click on the link at the bottom

She doesn't want to reply to sender. She wants to post a reply in the group. In any case, for all I know that may not work for her either. I doubt Reply to Sender or Reply to Group has anything to do

Maybe I'm missing something in this thread, but if she is only wanting to reply to one message in a digest, she should click on Reply to Sender and it will go directly to the person that wrote the

This is what I'm trying now Good point, but that's just MF's preference. In some cases replying to several messages in one thread at the same time makes sense It takes you to the part of the site

When a member leaves a group and then rejoins, the member's activity log and member page are thankfully fully restored, with one glaring exception: the Notes page is absent. Hoping that can be made to

Yes, that's one reason I am with a "small" ( thousands of subscribers) provider and happily paying a few euro. It uses spamassassin, which means I can (/have to) check my spambox for "ham" and unflag

"Why would you do that"? Because the digest specifically says at the top "do not reply to this email. To reply click reply-to-group below any message." That is not the option that takes you to the

Why would you do that? that's supposed to take you to the iogroups-website. If you want to reply from your own email, you click the "reply" of your email and delete the stuff in the digest that you

I recently moved a notification-only group from Yahoo. I established it in 2005 with no restrictions on who could join, and it now has about 250 members. After setting up a new group here I sent

Hi Mark, Could you not add a temporary rule on Adding along the lines of your "bouncing request" first before the add is processed? Regards Mo

John, People migrating groups from Yahoo have no idea how many bad addresses they have as the yahoo system has been broken for years. Bigger groups, who migrated before now, often found that up to 1/3

Mark, Thanks for all your hard work on this. It’s a thankless task at times. Re “I don't know how to prevent that behaviour”: you might need to publish some administrator guidelines.

Certainly in the past, the reason we've been put on blocklists was because of premium groups direct adding bad addresses to their groups. My suspicion is that with this last wave of Yahoo Group

It actually IS the case at GIO if the email service uses an FBL that GIO subscribes to. I know that Mark has subscribed to most of them, but there may be some smaller services using them that he's

I like this idea, but it would also help if there was greater contrast on the website and group links within emails.

Many people think that reporting a subscription email as spam will cause the sender to take them off the list -- which is not the case. All that generally does is to increment a counter in their

Many, many years ago, I met with the Yahoo Groups team at Yahoo headquarters in Sunnyvale. One of the engineers drew a block diagram of how Yahoo Groups works, which showed that they have a pools of