If you change the name of a group/subgroup that also affects the feed address. You will have to click the Subscribe to Calendar button again to get a new GIO feed and re-sub that to the Google

Peter -- Well, now I'm just being dumb. Apparently, my Owner account was actually moderated in my test group. I must have left it that way from some previous test I was doing. So it actually did go

I've about reached my breaking point related to Gio cal vs. G-cal and the unhealthy frienemy relationship they have had over the past couple of years. You can subscribe to the a couple of our Gio

Hi Mark, I searched and found that you mentioned in the July 24 site updates change log that "BUGFIX: Fixed sorting of Files section search results."

Hi All, We are caught up with email delivery. Thanks,Mark

Hi All, As you've hopefully noticed, email has started to flow again. We have quite a backlog to work through, however, so it will take some time before we're caught up. I believe I've stabilized

Thanks, Bruce. Yes, I'm aware of this. In fact I posted some time ago, either in GMF or here, about the inconsistent use of the word "bounce." Pete

Folks, I apologize - I misinterpreted what happened. The moderator in question actually added the new hashtag via the group website before posting the message. However, there is still a mystery: As I

Hello, We're currently seeing delayed delivery of email. I'm investigating and will post more when I know. Thanks, Mark

Further nailing down the bug: It turns out that the notifications are being sent for moderation in my group not because #file-notice is set to Moderated (it's not), but because my group is set to MFF

Peter -- The wording for this setting is currently being discussed for revision. Under no circumstances are messages actually bounced based on this setting. The help docs are also unclear on

So the message was (correctly) sent for moderation but the hashtag was created anyway, before the message was approved? That does sound like the wrong order. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of

That seems to be correct. But the bug is that even though my group is not moderated, and even though the hashtags are (correctly) not set to moderated, the notifications are being sent to pending for

It is now "later". :) I have spent a little time refreshing my memory about all this. My principal recollection is that I ended up thoroughly befuddled about the way things worked, or at least seemed

I should add - when a member does this, the message is properly kicked back. So the settings are correct.

Our group message policy setting includes "Messages from members can only be tagged with existing hashtags, otherwise the message is bounced." One of our moderators, who does not have permission to

Ok, it is a bug. I just checked and neither my group's #file-notice or #photo-notice tags are set to Moderated, yet the notifications are still being treated (and labelled in the log) as moderated.

I agree with this. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Thanks, Chris. I unfortunately mistook that for a reply to my private message and thought I was responding here. I look forward to your comments onlist. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

I think the hashtag should not have “moderated” set as a default, if that’s what’s going on. And the term “integration messsge” seems inexplicable and is confusing. -- J Messages are