So, now all voices have spoken. There does not seem to be any objection and, in fact, there appears to be support for a full date-time stamp of some sort. Message number is it's own thing and I have

JohnF via Groups.io wrote:>>I use message numbers all the time and would prefer they not be hidden.<< Same here. I believe I've already stressed the importance of navigating using the Message Numbers

Actually, upon further thought I agree with Brenda (shocker!) that you shouldn't have to hover to get the message #. Although contrary to what Brenda says I don't think that many people use them for

J_catlady wrote:>>I think this would be better. << I am completely against hiding the Message Numbers. I have explained in depth that I and others use them to navigate, and for reference. I cannot do

On 8/16/2016 10:03 AM, HR Tech via Groups.io wrote:>> - either the message # be something you find by hovering over the link icon<< That would never work for me. I use the message number to navigate,

I use message numbers all the time and would prefer they not be hidden. I'd also be happier with a full date/time time stamp shown without hovering, though it would also be OK to say "Today" or

I tried that for the particular member who left this morning. They didn't show up under either "changed email" or "changed name." I did a search in the log using the member's name and the only thing

Second. J - can you test if you search the logs for the new email address if it will tell you what the old one was? Like a xx@email . com changed their address from zzz @ email.com ? This way at

Often I'll get a notice that such-and-such @ whatever email address "has left." Sometimes I don't even remember who that was. Sometimes they've changed their name and/or email address since joining so

I use it once in a blue moon. I find it (irrationally?) reassuring that it's there, but that's about it. :-) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't,

J, You'll know I concur with the message number by hover, since I never use message numbers and always give the full click-through link if I am trying to direct someone to a specific

On mobile you don't see the message # - and that's totally fine. If you added date+time instead of only time or only date, you'd just need to make the font a touch smaller but it would totally work

I think this would be better. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu

In Y! groups you see the date and time ( not year) when you click in to a message ( so not in the message list view). So it would read: Aug 14 7:23 PM Here we have the message # which adds another

Duane, Mark said he is moving (has moved?) away from using that preference. https://groups.io/g/beta/message/10000 Perhaps what is needed is another distinction between the desktop and mobile

Duane & J, I hadn't known about the hover. Speaking for myself, that's absolutely not preferable and really not usable for all practical intents and purposes. I really want to be able

Brian, I recently posed a question on GMF about this because I wasn't seeing absolute dates any more, and got the same answer from Duane about hovering. I answered that I always forget to hover. Now

Hovering on the Date of a post will show the time when it's from the previous day (or earlier.) I use Absolute time as my site preference, so not sure if this is the same for Relative. Duane

The title pretty much sums it up. There are many times when I find it very handy to know exactly how many minutes, hours, etc., transpired between two posts in a single thread/topic. Unless there's

Hi All, As of this afternoon, it appears that Earthlink is no longer blocking us. Thanks, Mark