After a bit of basic testing it seems that if a mod has been granted 'Set Moderator Privileges' then they can turn notifications on and off in the Moderator Notifications panel of their membership

OTOH after posting this I know only that I, as group owner, can set mods with no permissions to receive the notifications. But I don’t know if the mod themself can opt to receive the notifications.

I seem to remember (although it may be wishful thinking) Mark making it so that only mods with the corresponding permissions had the options to receive notifications. This was something I requested at

I have no knowledge of Mark's thinking, and would prefer to let him speak for himself, where he wishes to, rather than have others speak for him. My thoughts are only to express alternative ways to

Well I for one expect that Mark has done exactly that, but I would not expect him to reveal the details. It's called commercial confidentiality. Chris

I don't care of the answers. Those represent a thought process that I go through when evaluating a venture. I suggest Mark personally do the same. Rather than just criticizing, why not state your

You're seriously purporting to ask Mark how much income he wants, and how much of it he wants to come from groups.io? God I love this thread... -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author,

I think more important is for assessing pricing is: How much, Mark, do you feel you need to make from all your endeavors to meet your desires? Within that, how much must come from Groups.io Then, how

I don't believe that was ever mentioned. You may be thinking about the $5 per account (email address) that was proposed, so you'd only pay $5 per year if you use the same account for all

Maybe we could think and suggest better if we first ask Mark... How much do you need per group? And/or... How much do you need per member... To fund all that must be funded, including

Trying to put this email burden into perspective, I've just done a bit of simple math on our main group. In December we received 379 individual messages from our members. I base this on the message

Shal, There is also a fairly large amount of compute burden in modern email for DMARK and other spam preventive measures for each message sent that must be considered when comparing the "burden"

Happy New Year to you and everyone too! 😊🐱 -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -

Progress is inherently a process of vulnerabilities to perceive and manage. If it does not move at a speed that precludes perfection, it may not advance at all. I am reminded of the saying that a

Ha. Not so sure about that. Heard about the giant Microsoft hack? Even Microsoft can't say whether the Russian hackers changed their code or their updates or their cloud storage or anything else. We

Hi Shal, Internet operations are obviously infinitely more complex than most of us know, or want to know; and yet it behooves us group owners and moderators to widen our perception and perspective to

To put it another way, large - scale over - quoting ratchets up (in this case) Groups.io's costs, or have misunderstood? Chris

Looking at recent posts, and picking out some points made It is a very basic IT/DataProcessing concept that it's all based on bits - storing, changing, copying them - and it's those that drive the

Hi WRB, The total size of data communicated may not be that much different. But the total burden is likely less for Digest because there would be up to 12 messages represented in a single digest. So

Hi Shal, Thanks for the response. You said: "What matters is how many of your members are on Individual messages: one posted message becomes a burden of up to 875 outbound messages, or 777 in the