Brian, Aww, just one small candle and a toothpick? Notice what we're about. We're discussing the features of a platform explicitly designed as the next generation of email lists. That's the singular

True - that the oldest (or first) in a topic appears first. But on the website, it is easy to click on Date and then they appear with the newest in the topic appearing first. Just did that! Frances

LOL. I'm not at all against the Topics view.. My problem is that as currently implemented (and this relates to a prior suggestion of yours, Brian, which I heartily supported, but which never

Every time I read about this sort of thing, and how much of it is engendered by e-mail as the communication medium, the more convinced I become (and I know this is a personal opinion, so please don't

They don't see it, there's no notification, and even notification by the moderator doesn't work because it's chronologically later in their inboxes than messages with the original title, so they

I believe that J_Catlady has done the best job of documenting the issues with split and merge. One of the things I'm tasked with is doing merges where new topics (that aren't really new topics) are

Bob, check out how to split and merge threads in the GroupManagersForum wiki. https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum Some group managers / moderators have said there can still be a problem because

Our members seem to defy all requests to initiate a new subject/topic when they have a new item to ask about or discuss. They simply use the reply function and as a result, most others, looking for

Video explain the problems https://groups.io/g/TheSeaofClaws/message/8

Don't be doin' me no favors, Joe! ;-) -- Brian Personally, I'm always ready to learn, although I do not always like being taught. ~ Winston Churchill

Hi, Ah, that's because I (the owner of that list) approved that message. Sorry about that. Cheers, Joseph

One of the groups I routinely participate on is the Windows 10 for Screen Reader Users group. I have moderator privileges on that group for the specific purpose of archive maintenance, which means in

Our latest TOU is available at all times. If we update it we special notice all members informing them that the new ones are in force and if they disagree they must resign. We were fortunate that a

Mark, Thanks. Will do. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author. Especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu

Our group does the same. However, the TOU changes from time to time in our group (and no-doubt some others), and members may lose (or delete) their original emails. I think that having the TOU easily

There seems to be two separate lines of argument going on here. The first is about tacky message trailers added by antivirus, etc and, btw, disclaimer trailers. The second morphed out of that and

Thanks Mark. That's all one can ask for! -- Brian Personally, I'm always ready to learn, although I do not always like being taught. ~ Winston Churchill

Hi All, Those ads do not add anything to the archives, and in fact detract from them. I am pro-automatic removal of them, and we do remove some of them. Unfortunately, it's a never ending battle; the

I have been trying to figure out if this is possible with this editor. I agree that it's needed. So far my research hasn't turned up an answer, but I'm still working on it. Thanks, Mark

Brian, Meanwhile, a work-around is to un-click the Blockquote format button (removing that style from the whole quote) then re-click it on the part(s) you want to keep. Example