And I am fine with Mark’s original plan, which I said as the first responder in his thread and have reaffirmed ever since. I have been responding in THIS thread to Mark’s *explicit request* for

But not on Basic groups. The method being discussed allows anyone to 'buy-in' to support GIO, owner or not, but IS NOT required. I maybe wrong, and Mark should correct me if I am, but the new pricing

No. Anything less than 1 minute before the event is ignored. Mark

Since people are contacting me offlist now, I've been forced out from under my rock again and am going to answer: I don't see Samuel's proposal in any way equivalent to the Meetup situation or any

If you have a 'number of members' based charging scheme, then members become a cost, that someone has to pay. In Mark's original scheme, this would fall solely on group owners. Some will be happy

Surely a '0 minutes before' #cal-reminder is actually a #cal-notice! :-) Andy

Hi Mark, Thanks for the quick response! One question, just to clarify; >>> This has been fixed. Setting a negative time results in the reminder being ignored. So a 0-minutes before reminder still is

This has been fixed. Setting a negative time results in the reminder being ignored. I've made the changes. Thanks for the clear, illustrated suggestion! Mark

I'm going to unfollow again now. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Yes. As I've said (frequently;), Mark's original proposal was fine with me even if it needs some tweaking as to amounts and/or limits. Yes because that's what THIS thread is about. I see the two

I see from this that Autofollow Replies takes precedence over Mute This Topic lol. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for

J, That sounds exactly like the situation under Mark's original proposal, plus a mechanism for voluntary payments by members (which I and others suggested). In the context of this topic I think what

Duane, thanks for the pointer to the app release info. Sandi, I would like to keep in touch and see what you find out. You can send me private email at joanie.m.nightingale if you like. I've got a

Another day, another thought. The closest situation to groups.io that I can think of is Meetup. A couple of years ago Meetup, which was formerly free, started to charge group owners a yearly fee. It

That's already covered in the new pricing structure that goes into effect on the 18th, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/27191 This topic is about the possibility of individual members sharing the

I own a number of groups, the larger one is just about 5000 users. All hobby-related, some have been in existence for nearly 20 years. I can't see the group membership not falling drastically if

Perhaps mirror the same terms as the proposed group tiers. A Basic Member and a Premium Member. On another note, I think many are making this overly complicated. Right now if a new group owner were

How interesting! I have spent the last week researching existing apps to meet a "generic" club's needs and if it was feasible to design an app for specific groups. There are a number of apps used by

I'm so very glad my group of about 1900 is a grandfathered Premium group which I pay $10 a month for out of my own pocket. I kept that secret from my members for a long time. Eventually, the members

The app is discussed in its own subgroup here. The latest information was just released a couple of days ago - https://beta.groups.io/g/app/message/327 No mention has been made about charging for