|
moderated
Re: Archive PremiumS
#suggestion
Bill,
You can simulate downgrading a free group by selectively (depending on when the group was created) locking features down so folks cannot send attachments, upload files, etc, something that
Bill,
You can simulate downgrading a free group by selectively (depending on when the group was created) locking features down so folks cannot send attachments, upload files, etc, something that
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#26790
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Archive PremiumS
#suggestion
All covered nicely in the Owners Manual.
Duane
All covered nicely in the Owners Manual.
Duane
|
By
Duane
·
#26789
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Archive PremiumS
#suggestion
If a group loses subgroups because of the downgrade, the subgroups are locked, not deleted. You can still see the archives, but it's all read-only.
Cheers,
Mark
If a group loses subgroups because of the downgrade, the subgroups are locked, not deleted. You can still see the archives, but it's all read-only.
Cheers,
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#26788
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Groups.io instead of Mailchimp
#misc
I approved this message by mistake. This is more appropriate for GMF and not beta.
Thanks,
Mark
I approved this message by mistake. This is more appropriate for GMF and not beta.
Thanks,
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#26787
·
|
|
moderated
Groups.io instead of Mailchimp
#misc
Has anyone tried using Groups.io instead of apps like Mailchimp? Obviously not for marketing, but maybe announcements only? Are there advantages to using this platform over the usual email apps?
Best
Has anyone tried using Groups.io instead of apps like Mailchimp? Obviously not for marketing, but maybe announcements only? Are there advantages to using this platform over the usual email apps?
Best
|
By
Steve
·
#26786
·
|
|
moderated
Archive PremiumS
#suggestion
Just a thought...
If a list is falling back to Free from Premium... and might not like it, they may take 30 days to really discuss it, and 30 to act.
So maybe Archive their SubGroups etc, while
Just a thought...
If a list is falling back to Free from Premium... and might not like it, they may take 30 days to really discuss it, and 30 to act.
So maybe Archive their SubGroups etc, while
|
By
billsf9c
·
#26785
·
|
|
moderated
Publicly Listed Groups results
#bug
When paging through the results of the various views in the groups directory, there comes a point when it won't show the next page. It always happens when crossing over the 10,000 results line. As
When paging through the results of the various views in the groups directory, there comes a point when it won't show the next page. It always happens when crossing over the 10,000 results line. As
|
By
Duane
·
#26784
·
|
|
moderated
Re: consider a "Like" to be a "follow"
#suggestion
Yeah, it came in handy for this; the Online Follow everywhere ability had been asked a few times before, so your post pushed it off the table and into the done basket. :D
Yeah, it came in handy for this; the Online Follow everywhere ability had been asked a few times before, so your post pushed it off the table and into the done basket. :D
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#26783
·
|
|
moderated
Re: consider a "Like" to be a "follow"
#suggestion
Did you say that because I'm Catlady? Cats are always pushing things off the edge of tables. ;)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up
Did you say that because I'm Catlady? Cats are always pushing things off the edge of tables. ;)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#26782
·
|
|
moderated
Re: consider a "Like" to be a "follow"
#suggestion
Mark, many thanks for adding this, it makes following groups online a lot faster and easier!
Thanks to J as well for finally pushing it over the table edge :)
Cheers,
Christos
Mark, many thanks for adding this, it makes following groups online a lot faster and easier!
Thanks to J as well for finally pushing it over the table edge :)
Cheers,
Christos
|
By
Christos G. Psarras
·
#26781
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Summary email has subject "digestnoreply"
#bug
One last note on this, for anyone on an iPhone: It turns out that ios 14.1 fixes the "sends from wrong email address" bug. The bug was in 14.0. However, the fix results in the "name" part of the email
One last note on this, for anyone on an iPhone: It turns out that ios 14.1 fixes the "sends from wrong email address" bug. The bug was in 14.0. However, the fix results in the "name" part of the email
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#26780
·
|
|
moderated
Database ordering and datetime field
#suggestion
A date time field would be a handy feature for the database for a use case we have: we need to add entries for past events that occurred at a specific date and time, we then need to display the
A date time field would be a handy feature for the database for a use case we have: we need to add entries for past events that occurred at a specific date and time, we then need to display the
|
By
Chris Smith
·
#26779
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Wording to disable two-factor (2FA)
#suggestion
Concerning my original suggestion, I don't mind if you added "(NOT your OTP)" however my point is to not say any more in the label than what needs to be entered in that text field. I was mistaken
Concerning my original suggestion, I don't mind if you added "(NOT your OTP)" however my point is to not say any more in the label than what needs to be entered in that text field. I was mistaken
|
By
Jeff Smith
·
#26778
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Wording to disable two-factor (2FA)
#suggestion
People have continued arguments from a thread in Group_Help where someone else had 2FA problems, so I probably left all of my "good evidence" there.
It is without any refutability however, proven that
People have continued arguments from a thread in Group_Help where someone else had 2FA problems, so I probably left all of my "good evidence" there.
It is without any refutability however, proven that
|
By
Jeff Smith
·
#26777
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Wording to disable two-factor (2FA)
#suggestion
Sorry, I realize now GIO provides 2FA recovery codes at setup.
Sorry, I realize now GIO provides 2FA recovery codes at setup.
|
By
Mark Murphy
·
#26776
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Wording to disable two-factor (2FA)
#suggestion
Why not require both factors to disable 2FA?
Why not require both factors to disable 2FA?
|
By
Mark Murphy
·
#26775
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Wording to disable two-factor (2FA)
#suggestion
I think the OP was first concerned with the dialog wording on which credential is required to Disable 2FA. I agree that could be made more clear.
On the issue of requiring a password or 2FA in order
I think the OP was first concerned with the dialog wording on which credential is required to Disable 2FA. I agree that could be made more clear.
On the issue of requiring a password or 2FA in order
|
By
Mark Murphy
·
#26774
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Wording to disable two-factor (2FA)
#suggestion
Good point Donald,
The reason they want you to have multiple methods (i.e. phone# and another email), and also remind you to check all of them regularly, is because of the assumption they would not
Good point Donald,
The reason they want you to have multiple methods (i.e. phone# and another email), and also remind you to check all of them regularly, is because of the assumption they would not
|
By
Jeff Smith
·
#26773
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Wording to disable two-factor (2FA)
#suggestion
Obviously what I have said (require the OTP to turn off 2FA) does stop the intrusion that I explained. So I don't know why you are pretending that is not enough security for that.
If you are just
Obviously what I have said (require the OTP to turn off 2FA) does stop the intrusion that I explained. So I don't know why you are pretending that is not enough security for that.
If you are just
|
By
Jeff Smith
·
#26772
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Summary email has subject "digestnoreply"
#bug
One point that's not OT: moderators may want to be on the alert for a lot of attempted posts by "non-members," which are actually just members using their iPhones and thinking that they're sending a
One point that's not OT: moderators may want to be on the alert for a lot of attempted posts by "non-members," which are actually just members using their iPhones and thinking that they're sending a
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#26771
·
|