That works. Someone wanting to follow topics will now get those messages. That also makes sense. It's less necessary than the first change but it eliminates some confusion. What's still missing is

Hi All, I've been following the discussion. I started to implement a new subscription page similar to what Christos proposed. But I decided, at least for now, to go with a couple smaller changes: When

Oof. Fixed. It's $0.44/$2.20, correct on the upgrade page, was incorrect on the pricing page. Thanks, Mark

Clarification please. On the Pricing page, it says "with additional members $0.04/month or $0.40/year" (Similar for Enterprise, "$0.20/month or $2.00/year") Thanks, Duane

Yes, that is correct. On the Upgrade screen, you should have seen something like: Thanks, Mark

Mark, I just tried to pay for a group I created before the per member pricing change. 'BiomedicalWorld' is the group. It was created on Feb. 1st - all the payment screens indicated the new per member

Instead of only individual viewevent?eventid= RSVPs, also allow multiple events to be RSVPd, with a single click of Will Attend or Not Sure, after multi-selecting. Related, but maybe worthy of

I think I may have just got to the bottom of this. At least to the bottom of the cause of the bug if not to the actual fixes needed. With my account set to UTC, I was seeing events in /feed showing 8

Yes, those are also no longer counted. Thanks, Mark

:-) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Yes, something is definitely needed, it's not just the bugs, but also overall easier and better user experience as well. LOL, I need an editor for my emails ... but at

Emphasis on "needed." Thanks for the clarification. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

>>> It (the UI) is really in radical need of a fix and I hope this doesn't get swept under the rug. Oops, I should had bolded what I was referring to with the "No" bit, "No it's not, at

Yes (I'll present the whole proposal in a complete and concise manner in a new topic) And also yes (but if we present it the right way it may increase our chances of it happening)

And also does not include "Bouncers", both blue and red. Was that intentional? Chris

Oh, you mean it's not getting swept under the rug, you don't mean that you disagree it's in need of a fix. Good. However, it's not up to us whether or not anything is done about this. It's obviously

I don't. Many of my group members have fallen into this trap, which was the whole reason I brought it up here. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

>>> OMG! Listen to this. This is a case in point and the victim was me, myself and I. Don't feel alone, I also have been undeservedly-tricked by the system a few times!

This should be fixed now. Thanks, Mark

Particularly confusing is this juxtaposition, because of the possible conflation of "message" and "email": Special Notices Only You will only receive special notices from the moderators. No Email