Bruce, Please try again, it should be fixed now. Thanks, Mark

Thank you for that explanation! This has been something that I've been dealing with for a year now, and I was unable to get an explanation of what was going on from anyone, mainly because I think most

We have a number of users who are either using email via on-premise Exchange, hosted Exchange, or Office 365 business/enterprise. Exchange checks both the envelope-From address (SMTP FROM) and the

Whether or not it's limited to a specific browser, and whether or not someone knows that detail, it's a bug and does not belong in beta. If it was a user issue ("how do I edit") it likewise does not

Unless he had a range of other Browsers available the fact that the problem was limited to Safari might not be immediately obvious., Claws away, please! Chris

Well, just bring informative since there are a lot of new people here (including you, I think?) If the edit function is broken ( which it is in safari) I don’t think anyone could interpret it as

Perhaps he didn't realise it was a bug. Chris

ps Bugs are supposed to be reported to support, not beta. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond

That’s a Safari link issue thst Mark is working on fixing. For now, do a right click to open the link in another window or tab, or use a different browser. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of

When I go to the Hashtag tab, I see the box for each of my hashtags and the edit button seems hot, but when I click on it it goes to the messages under that tag. It does not open the edit screen?

Ronaldo wrote: I’m not sure what the difference in the end result is. Ideally our users would reply in a format similar to this post but they are either unable to do so or unable to learn. PS, the

Shal Farley wrote: >>Later I proposed a snippet of the quoted message, rather than the whole quote, might provide sufficient context in the majority of cases. That is probably simpler to implement

err..no. it removes everything under the last unindented line, and If I had my way this would be the standard - as it supports traditional quoting in "usenet" and most decent discussion-lists. If

https://groups.io/maintenance/index.html -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu

https://groups.io/maintenance/index.html -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu

I missed something ... what cat pictures? Mike Conder

I'm glad Linda said it: this emperor has no clothes. There is just no real problem here. None of the few members who have been removed have complained or asked for an explanation: they click on the

Hi Folks, Occasionally I see a member leave and rejoin. With 2400 members, the current system seems to be working perfectly. I've never had to explain what is going on - they get it. Some of them

Lol -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu

Paul, I've wished for limited quoting in digests. By limited I mean just the direct quote (first-level) and not the quotes that quote drags in. One of the defects of the Y!Group digest is that it can