|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
This is related to my question (two posts back) about the difference between this method and the current method, wherein the user gets an email with a resubscribe link. Currently, after someone
This is related to my question (two posts back) about the difference between this method and the current method, wherein the user gets an email with a resubscribe link. Currently, after someone
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#16974
·
|
|
moderated
Formatting Wiki Pages
The wiki editor does not appear to support inline styles (they are stripped when you save). Even things like {float:right} are stripped. Because of this, I've had to resort to long-deprecated HTML
The wiki editor does not appear to support inline styles (they are stripped when you save). Even things like {float:right} are stripped. Because of this, I've had to resort to long-deprecated HTML
|
By
Bruce Bowman
·
#16973
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
I'm getting confused here. it seems to be like this:
Some email-message from groups.io lands in somebody's spambox.
His/her ISP sends some message to groups.io requesting to stop messages.
When
I'm getting confused here. it seems to be like this:
Some email-message from groups.io lands in somebody's spambox.
His/her ISP sends some message to groups.io requesting to stop messages.
When
|
By
ro-esp
·
#16972
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
That sounds good 👍
By
kr402
·
#16971
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Yes
By
Tom Vail
·
#16970
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
I understand what's being proposed. What I don't understand is the advantage of it over unsubscribing the member, especially when the resolution of it is so unclear. Is the advantage that the person
I understand what's being proposed. What I don't understand is the advantage of it over unsubscribing the member, especially when the resolution of it is so unclear. Is the advantage that the person
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#16969
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Member badges
I've changed the NC badge to be orchid.
Thanks,
Mark
I've changed the NC badge to be orchid.
Thanks,
Mark
|
By
Mark Fletcher
·
#16968
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
J,
What's being proposed is a mechanism that does not unsubscribe the member when a feedback loop spam report message comes in. The member remains subscribed but sending email to them is on hold
J,
What's being proposed is a mechanism that does not unsubscribe the member when a feedback loop spam report message comes in. The member remains subscribed but sending email to them is on hold
|
By
Toby Kraft
·
#16967
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
I'm sure I'm missing the subtleties but right now all a removed user has to do to be reinstated is click on the resubscribe link. They can conceivably do that any number of times, causing repeated
I'm sure I'm missing the subtleties but right now all a removed user has to do to be reinstated is click on the resubscribe link. They can conceivably do that any number of times, causing repeated
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#16966
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Final point.
With over half million users and over 7000 groups (last count I remember)
we would have scads of people, majority untrained, attempting what many professionals don't know how to do.
--
Final point.
With over half million users and over 7000 groups (last count I remember)
we would have scads of people, majority untrained, attempting what many professionals don't know how to do.
--
|
By
Bob Bellizzi
·
#16965
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Tom,
The effect of a message being classed as spam by the receiving ISP is far more serious than a message rejected for no such account.
The initial labeling of a message as spam sets up a watch on
Tom,
The effect of a message being classed as spam by the receiving ISP is far more serious than a message rejected for no such account.
The initial labeling of a message as spam sets up a watch on
|
By
Bob Bellizzi
·
#16964
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Good point Bob. I know it makes it more complex, but maybe it could have a counter and the 3 time it happens then the moderator gets involved. And when the message is sent to the blocked user, there
Good point Bob. I know it makes it more complex, but maybe it could have a counter and the 3 time it happens then the moderator gets involved. And when the message is sent to the blocked user, there
|
By
Tom Vail
·
#16963
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Allowing the user to simply reset the suspension is problematic. The majority of members in groups, is unlikely to be experienced in the steps that might be needed to clear a spam flag their ISP set
Allowing the user to simply reset the suspension is problematic. The majority of members in groups, is unlikely to be experienced in the steps that might be needed to clear a spam flag their ISP set
|
By
Bob Bellizzi
·
#16962
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Correct.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
Correct.
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#16961
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
"Spam Report Hold" is better than “Suspended.”
Peace,
Tom
"Spam Report Hold" is better than “Suspended.”
Peace,
Tom
|
By
Tom Vail
·
#16960
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
slammed
:-)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
slammed
:-)
--
J
Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't. - Desmond Tutu
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#16958
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Good idea, Shal!
I would suggest "Spam Report Hold" to clearly indicate why email is suspended. Also, there needs to be a way to view the report that came from the mailbox provider. As time goes on,
Good idea, Shal!
I would suggest "Spam Report Hold" to clearly indicate why email is suspended. Also, there needs to be a way to view the report that came from the mailbox provider. As time goes on,
|
By
Toby Kraft
·
#16957
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Shal,
That is a great idea! How about "Email suspended" for a setting name? Are you thinking the user could clear (un-check) it, or would that require the moderator? I would vote for the user. If
Shal,
That is a great idea! How about "Email suspended" for a setting name? Are you thinking the user could clear (un-check) it, or would that require the moderator? I would vote for the user. If
|
By
Tom Vail
·
#16956
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
Chris,
For the record, I've since decided that modifying the member's Email Delivery setting is the wrong approach.
Rather, I would have a new status, similar to "Bouncing" but operating on a
Chris,
For the record, I've since decided that modifying the member's Email Delivery setting is the wrong approach.
Rather, I would have a new status, similar to "Bouncing" but operating on a
|
By
Shal Farley
·
#16955
·
|
|
moderated
Re: AOL problem
The option to disable ‘no email’ was an extremely hard-won battle and removing it would be unacceptable. Moderators need to be able to ensure that they can reach all members with a special notice.
The option to disable ‘no email’ was an extremely hard-won battle and removing it would be unacceptable. Moderators need to be able to ensure that they can reach all members with a special notice.
|
By
J_Catlady
·
#16954
·
|