Bruce, Indeed so. My answer to the cluttered Email Photos album may have seemed a toss-off ("I don't need to look there"), but yours is not much less so: you wouldn't have one at all (or would have

I do understand why some people would choose not to implement this in their own group(s). However, keep in mind that much of the problem stems not at all from the original post, but all the replies

Drew, I like that suggestion, it relates here in the sense of providing a reminder of images lost, given the implementation of (2). I like the idea of allowing the group managers to move selected

Bruce, Ah, I was wondering if you'd allow attachments, or require them to use the Photos section instead. To me, stripping all embedded images just to cope with the proliferation problem feels like

Drew -- How does this address duplication of images in the Emailed Photos folder? Your thumbnail suggestion has applicability not only to embedded images but to attached ones as well. While I agree it

Sounds good. YahooGroups automatically removed attachments from messages and put them in an “Attachments” folder in the “Files” section. This made it easy for members to find an attachment

Here's a suggestion... 1. All emailed images would be retained permanently as downsized thumbnails, viewable beneath their associated posts in the archive MESSAGES and TOPICS listings, as per

Brilliant! Many thanks, Mark. Cheers Helen

The "cid" version is the only one that I consider objectionable, inasmuch as these are the ones that proliferate. An image embedded via a hyperlink (e.g: an <img> tag) is not objectionable to me, as

Bruce, As you may know, images can be embedded in HTML formatted messages using a few different schemes, only one of which ("cid") would be subjected to the existing group Attachments control, and

Yes, but this is not the same as limiting the size of the attachment in MB. It does nothing to attachments that are not images. And an uncompressed TIFF file can be pretty big even after it's been

Mark, Maybe "Force HTML Emails" should be a subscription option rather than a group option. Or in addition to. That way members who seem incapable (for whatever reason) of "going private" by simply

Brian, That one in particular I wish was also in the formatting toolbar above the message composition box, as an ad hoc override to the default one sets in one's account preferences. It has no

Ok, it is clear now. I admit i did not thoroughly look for option description as I assumed that it limits size of incoming messages not outgoing. I am very surprised to hear that. I have posted

Right. That’s what I had in mind in thinking ‘attachments.’ You and Bruce are correct. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in

Hi All, Earlier this morning, someone sent a massive 55mb 43k x 21k image through the system (the group was not set to resize images in emails), and it caused a bit of havoc with some processes

Photo attachments can be limited by resampling. Go to Settings > Photos > Max Size In Email and set to "Automatically resize photos that are larger than a specific size in emails." There is an option

This is not a bug. You may be misunderstanding the settings available. Take this to Group Manager's Forum https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum and we can discuss it there. Dano

They can't. Bruce

Since messages can be rejected based on too large of an attachment, I think, unless I totally misunderstand, that the group setting does limit the attachment size the group will accept. But agree that