As I recall, Mark decided to remove the nirmak option.

Do. Or not do. There is no try. -- Yoda

If you don't select "Only moderators and poll creators can view results and responders, regardless of whether the poll is open or closed." or "Do not show who responded to the poll.", then everyone

I see all of those options when I create a poll. Pete

Thanks for the entertainment! I needed that. :) Seriously. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

I run very open lists, membership-wise. I madeva pill a d do nitbsee a nirmak option, ti allow members to see poll results as we go. Tied, or Seporate, must be, allowing members to See or Not See, who

Not completely. While there is rational for requiring a CC to CHANGE a group's status,all owners should be able to VIEW a group's status including the name/IDof the current "payor". In addition,

You don't have to log in when you click on that link. We know who you are from the link. Mark

Folks have recently commented on the requirement to log in after clicking the unsub link in a message footer. This is problematic for those members who never use the web interface; you have to train

Hi All, I am in need of some simple graphics work done. Yes, that includes fixing the favicon, but also includes creating a new splash screen for the app. Not a lot of work, and not very complicated,

Shal, thank you clarifying the consistency question is about "when" I get notified -- I agree. Sorry, I couldn't resist this:

Mark, You don't have to care about why. Or when. You can just handle them as needed. You will, if you've opted to. The consistency question has to do with "when". I think the proper way to look at

>>> "I believe that was implemented so that others couldn't submit subscription requests using your email address." >>> That makes sense for stand-alone groups.

This further shows the need for cleaning up the whole confirmation process, especially in regards to precautions taken due to possible spammers and bots (as I think is implied as the reason here). --

Yes, that has been known to be the case. But so what? The issue of the confusion-causing inconsistency remains. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My

After re-reading Shal's comment about no notice sent to owner/mod when subscribing via email from non-gio account, I understand why it may be set up this way. Are web subscribe requests less likely to

"I believe that was implemented so that others couldn't submit subscription requests using your email address." Of course. That makes sense for stand-alone groups. However, in the case of a

This. Why do I have to care or think about all the various reasons why I as an owner/moderator am sent/not sent apply or confirmation message? I'm not sure that is practical or consistent. My use case

I've confirmed that this sequence of actions does lead to those two log entries. Thanks Mark...appreciate the explanation! When you click the footer link, it doesn't actually unsubscribe you right

I appears that on an older iPhone when you have more than 20 RSVP responses the bottom of the page including the link to subsequent pages and the footer line - About, Features, Pricing.... is not