Agree, that's the point I was making. Best, Glenn -- PG&E Delenda Est

Glenn, This already happens for each member's mute or follow choices. So not much new about that part. It doesn't matter whether Charlie uses individual vs digest, nor email vs web. All that matters

That's correct. Based on past history, in all likelihood it would never be affected as long as you don't upgrade.

For 950 members I believe it would be $522.50 per year, not $2,000. The per-member fee is for all members above 400, so $220 base + 550 x $0.55. Per Mark: Premium Starting at $20/month or

I may be misunderstanding, but I gather that my 20-year-old group of 950 members that was migrated to groups.io in late 2019 and is now a basic rather than a premium group would not immediately be

It also blocks the next page arrow:

BTW, the idea of charging extra for "premium" features over an otherwise free use-of-product goes by the name "freemium", according to Wikipedia, been around since the 1980's. I see this as being most

But on further reflection, I think this leads to madness. Alice and Bob don't like each other and mute each other. Both are on digest, so the system has to figure out, on a member by

My biggest concern is the "low" limit on the number of members for each level of groups. I currently have 5 groups, one a test group. All except the test group were started almost 6 years ago. The

Ah... I did scan much of the messages but there were so many ;-) Well, not for me to say what would be a maintenance headache. There would have to be some programming added to the group sign-up re

That idea occurred to me early in this conversation but it frankly seems like it would be even more maintenance headache/overhead. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the

Here's another way to slightly monetize a group that would be low pain, to help cover costs of running everything: Have two basic levels, one free as defined now, and one for $25 flat fee per year

That explains everything! I knew there was a reason I liked it. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be

This is specifically in response to comments about not needing all of the features that GIO offers. I made this point during the "free to premium expanse" discussion a couple of months ago. I'm not

Obviously some very different views on this issue. Of the three groups I am owner of: A national amateur radio group (with plenty of international members) which has annual subs. 900 members of

Of course not. I would want it for my cats group but not my neighborhood block group, for example. This suggestion, at least the initial one I made, for this feature is that it would be optional, both

The problem that Mark has, and is endeavouring to solve, is one that is - essentially - common to all (or at least most) internet based operations: how do you charge for - monetise if you will - a

I co-own a group for a motorbike club. I Direct Add new members when they join and have paid their membership fee, and remove them when they leave or don't pay their membership fee. I wouldn't want

The return to top button blocks December message history links. This is on an iPhone SE 2020.

Hello, Apologies as I haven’t read through the entire thread. I manage a group that I migrated from Yahoo Groups last year. We upgraded to a Premium subscription for 12 months to ensure we were