Done. Thanks, Mark

I'm not able to reproduce this. Is your subgroup moderated? Or is the member that is attempting to post moderated in the parent group in some way (override: moderated, or NuM)? That would cause

Hello, As promised, here is the post-mortem from the recent downtime of a couple weekends ago. The site was mostly unreachable for two periods the weekend of 2/9-10/19. The periods were: 2/9/19

I think it would a nice feature in the Photos Section to be able to select more than one photo at a time, to delete. or, maybe a feature to select Edit, and choose which photos you'd like to delete,

Received from John McLachlan at 2/18/2019 05:21 PM UTC: You could place the people posting unnecessary/repetitive/whatever images on moderation and ask them to stop posting pointless images. Then for

Well, there are useful attachments and the rest. ;-) Worst is the people who have attached images of their signature or their work logo. useless attachments, and they're clogging up the attachments

Or even move the sentence so that it's above the Alias box and change it to "Note: Topics tagged with this hashtag will be transfered to the Alias hashtag." Duane

Thanks Andy! I've always been confounded by the antecedent to "this" on the existing page. Putting the names in the text resolves that nicely. Much better than the circumlocutions I've come up

Hi Mark, I think the message stating which topics with one hashtag are going to be transferred to another could be clearer: Can we substitute the hashtags in question into the message text? For

That would/could only happen if (a) the subgroup member is a moderator of the main group and (b) the subgroup member uses the Send Message feature from the member's page. Both of those comprised my

Oh, ok. I wasn't looking at the interaction of the two settings, nor at web vs email replies. I was referring only to the fact that when it IS working as intended, it STILL does not allow the

My point was that the message from a parent group member to a subgroup ends up being either rejected or moderated due to the setting of 'Allow Non Subscribers to Post'. The option 'Allow Parent

Mark, Yay, sort-of. This still leaves events as a back-door around moderation, if members are allowed to create events. That could be significant for groups that rely on NuM to weed out spammers

Nice to see all your responses. I don't want to moderate anyone. They would get upset. The ads can't be controlled because it seems to come from some using the incredimail mail program. I want the

Anita, Not really. The photos had to be stored so they would be visible when you look at the messages. The Emailed Photos album is just another way to find them, it doesn't take up any extra

I agree with this. Please do this. Anita

I agree with this. Hope it will be done soon. Anita

No notification is given to the member when ANY edits are made to a pending moderated post. So I would not call the specific behavior with respect to photos anamolous. (It's debatable whether or not

In a moderated group if an attached photo is deleted as part of the moderation process (leaving other photos present) then the originator is not specifically notified unless the moderator adds a

Yes I reported it as a bug but haven't heard anything back. I am told that I won't hear anything until either it is fixed or not going to be worked on.