Mark, Missed this one (for some it's kind-of a big one): * CHANGE: Only display photos in the Emailed Photos album that are larger than 100x100

Received from J_Catlady at 3/23/2019 10:37 PM UTC: There ya go!! That seems like it would be pretty hard to nitpick to death as being "confusing" at some future date. With apologies to Bob Dylan...

That might cause issues with the email server since it would seem an infinite number of accounts, one per message in the archive. If the Subject of SendMeMessage were the message number it eases the

sorry for hashtag typo...can't fix -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Specifying the topic title in a member's email delivery history is minimally useful if the most recent successful and most recent unsuccessful deliveries are from the same topic. The link to the

Mark, I'm confused. I thought it already was, and that was the complaint: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/30699549#20418 Shal

Thanks so much, Mark! That seems to be a solution that could please everyone. It will be helpful to my groups to see the newest photo in each album first, but we liked the albums themselves sorted by

My favorite would be SendMeMessage#xyz -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond

...or ordering it for delivery. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

I was thinking "OrderMessage." Like you're ordering it off a menu. :) -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only

Bob Bellizzi wrote: and later: Call seems a bit obscure. How about +retrieve ? Or even +GetMessage ? Either way, it sounds like the email-command equivalent of the web Send-to-me feature I proposed

Possibly, or from an individual message received via email, or, in response to a request from a member one of our "mentors" might run a search and provide the message number. Or, in a more recent

-- I'm not sure I'm understanding the idea. Is this so a member can have a message re-sent to them by the system rather than having to go to the web page to read it? Dano

Ok. Totally distinct idea from mine and I can see where it might be useful. One question: how would the member know the message number they want to receive in the first place? From the digest or

Bare bones description w/o reasons: Provide an additional email command, similar to those for changing email delivery, to give email only members the ability to have a specific, by number, message

While I don't understand the details of this request, I may have a similar request, namely: it would be very convenient to have a way to alert a certain group member to a specific a message, either by

I realized that most of our 3500 member depend on email rather that online communication so specifying a message number for answer's to questions and even public or other wiki doesn't help them.

If the last sentence is true then IMHO it reinforces the old agage of "be careful what you ask for". I have spent a lot of time with "historical" photos within albums to put photos in a sensible order

Mark, just letting you (and anyone else who may be wondering about this) know that I can no longer find the example of nor reproduce this logging issue. I think the logging is fine and will not be

Is all Yahoo? In our group Yahoo.uk has been affected but .com not - so far. Regards