I understand and support that guideline, and try to follow it. That being said, there is a fine line between "debating usefulness" and discussing just what features in a proposed feature suggestion

I generally support the proposal, but would like to share three thoughts on the matter. 1) It seems appropriate that a Moderator should be able to open his own user record and see his own Moderator

Yes! Maybe there should be a Group Guidelines page in beta, with that in it. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we

Copying a screen print could be a temporary work around. No one knows how many people need/want this function. It might be a simple addition and Mark has already said that suggestions are welcome

Well, (a) nobody is "insisting" on anything. We make our cases here and Mark is capable of making his own decisions as to priority And (b) you have no evidence for your claim that the request is just

I have to gree here. I'm an owner of several groups and I'm the only mod but if I appoint one while I'm on vacation etc just in case somethingn happens to meI want them to be able to see what hey an

If you really wish to inform your moderators of all moderator rights/privileges, you could always copy/past a set to them instead of insisting Mark make changes to the system to just to suit a couple

My only concern about that is the nightmare it makes for implementation, and given that most groups have very few moderators in sheer number, it is not at all difficult for an owner to select (or

Agreed. Barb

I think you would need to clarify exactly what you mean by a moderator to have no specific privileges. Now it would be possible (I suppose) to appoint a subscriber as a moderator but not give them any

This seems obvious to me. Without that, it's a guessing game. An oracle. They have to try it to see if they're allowed to do it, which seems ridiculous. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the

IMHO, no: the GMF discussion (on how and why) on this particular issue reached a conclusion: that a change is desirable - discussion of that change, to reach a consensus, is a matter for Beta.

Given that the above may well be true can I suggest / request that further discussion reverts to the GMF topic where it all began? The relevant thread starts here. Better that than clogging up

Enjoy, Mark you deserve a few days away. Peter

Pedja, See: https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/message/14674 Shal

Changes to the site this week: INTERNAL: Work on adding the ability to charge for subscriptions. BUGFIX: Work to fix a parsing bug in Outlook for ICS files with newlines in the description. NEW: New

Have a great vacation Mark. It is much deserved. Doug

And if you can't dispatch of "bad fits" just as you hire 'em on, you (the generic you) are not a good manager (owner, in this case). It's a part of the job. It is up to managers not to perpetuate the

Have a well-deserved good time. -- Bob Bellizzi Founder, Fuchs Friends ® Founder & Executive Director, The Corneal Dystrophy Foundation