Sorry, yes I was addressing Beth but your message about her not wanting the apply button prompted me to write what I wrote. Hopefully she will write back and let us know or understand what she means

No, e-mail programs that support threading don't use the subject line as a "threader", but rather use clues left in the e-mail's headers. If you send a new e-mail that just happens to have the same

Leeni: I had to read your message a couple of times to work out whether you were addressing me or Beth. I realised you were addressing Beth, and FWIW I was wondering exactly the same as you about her

I think that you think that Restricted means by invite only and that is why you won't want the apply button there. I think restricted just means subscriptions need approval or rejection from an

Perhaps I am having a senior moment but if the Apply button is removed how are people going to, er, apply? And do we assume that you want the "apply by email" function removed as well? Chris Chris

We should now be re-writing the From lines for post to sub messages. Thanks, Mark

Using "Reply to group" results in the message created still being correctly threaded on the web forum, which implies to me that it would also keep it threaded correctly in an e-mail reader. It is,

I have a restricted group, and I do not want people to be able to apply to join the group from the main group page (the one you see if you aren't logged in). I have tried everything I know to tell

And tell them why. What might be a good Idea is to put them on New Member Moderation with a count of 4 and inform them they are moderated because of the profuse thanking. Don't tell them it's only for

Even if such a filter were (realistically) feasible, which I don't think it is, it would be overly sensitive. Do you really want to moderate every post containing the word "thanks"? I think not. The

Mark, As I mentioned before, paradoxically, after you started the From address rewriting for gmail, the "bcc me" on member messages using "send message" started displaying the spam-warning behavior.

I'm not trying to catch out people who are trying to catch me out. I just want to catch people who are in auto-pilot mode. As soon as a member starts doing what you're talking about, he'll get one

Samuel, Probably a waste of time. When some one twigs what is going on they will use "T H A N K S" Or some HTML with &nbsp perhaps, or even simply substitutes the Spanish "Thañks" ... ... people

Hi All, I've just pushed out the following changes: - I have two internal lists of domains: a list of domains hosted by Gmail, and a list of domains hosted by Exchange. - For domains hosted by Gmail,

Hello How feasible is it to allow moderators to moderate messages based on keywords that occur in those messages? For example, I don't want people to send "thank you" messages to the group, but many

Hello everyone In my opinion, the current wording in the HTML footer encourages bad mailing list etiquette. The names of the links "Reply To Group" and "Reply To Sender" imply that clicking them

You have a Yahoo Group transfer scheduled. If you'd like all the transferred members to have the 100kb max attachment size, go into the Default Sub Settings for your group and set the Max Attachment

Hello As the moderator of a list, I decided that a certain setting should be changed on the profile pages of all members (they will be able to change it back, if they prefer). This means that I have

Mark, I believe the original impetus for #4 was from a group owner who wanted to be able to set that function for his group members because they were predominantly exchange users. I suggested making