What is almost a passing remark contains what I suspect is A Great Truth. A poll I conducted on the group I moderate revealed that the majority of (our) subscribers used Groups.io via the web UI only

J, It remembers, but then deliberately throws that memory out the window if you click to the group through the (was home, now /groups) page instead of the Your Groups drop-list. As you said later

J, ... then in a later message: Ok, right. Because the date sort refers to the date of the most recent post in the Topic, not the first. Would a reasonable implementation be to have the Date column

..should read will goad Mark. Artifact of bad edit of my original draft. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can

No, we're not reversing roles. LOL next few days vs. long-term. That's not going to happen until hell freezes over. And the rest of it probably won't happen in the next few days, either. :) I'm not

Hmm, are we reversing roles here? No reason to be negative. I'm thinking long term, not just the next few days. -- Gerald

Obviously, that's understood. The problem is that it's forced on us as the landing page. I'm not sure how many of us want a dynamic "feed" (which doesn't even refresh itself - it's really neither here

It’s a feed. By definition it’s not static. Much like whatever online newspaper one reads tomorrow will not look as it did today. Or as breaking news gets published. Or even ones email inbox. Or

That would be nice but is never going to happen. I'm only asking for realistic, easily implementable stuff. Glad you like the other suggestions. If they get done, I might even tolerate/like the feed

Well, there's a reason they do it. And there's a reason here to do it. These are tradeoffs. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in

I would hate to see Mark “neo” us when we have such a good thing going. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can

Precisely, and isthe greatest downfall of different platforms!! It's a huge PITA. And developers /site owners want (FORCE) you to use an app that has near zero the functionalityof their website

OK, now we're getting somewhere. Along with what you said for item 2 & 4, I would definitely also want to see a way of being able to set an arbitrary order. -- Gerald

And on top of that: I think it would be a good idea to provide checkboxes to accounts to let them specify which groups to include in the feed and which groups not to include. In terms of a feed page

Mark, This is more of a general comment related to maintaining backward compatibility when making changes. I didn't have any specific defaults in mind if that is what you are thinking about. --

That's precisely the VERY SERIOUS problem with it. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

I don't like it, especially that THE ORDER OF THE GROUPS BOUNCESAROUND WITH EACH VISIT!! That said, I really don't care... because I receive all messages fromthe groups I own and subscribe to as

Lots of apps look different from their desktop versions. -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human

Because: 1- Why would you make 2 versions of the same platform 2- Why would you have a different home/landing page on an app vs desktop/mobile web. Who even does that? 3- The reasons why the feed

Then why not make it specific to the app only? -- J Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones. My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. -